Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerPlus
SpringerPlus Cover Image

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research
  • Open Access

Meiotic restitution mechanisms involved in the formation of 2n pollen in Agave tequilana Weber and Agave angustifolia Haw

  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
SpringerPlus20121:17

https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-1-17

©  Gómez-Rodríguez et al.; licensee Springer. 2012

  • Received: 23 July 2012
  • Accepted: 6 September 2012
  • Published:

Abstract

A cytological analysis of the microsporogenesis was carried out in the Agave tequilana and A. angustifolia species. Several abnormalities such as chromosomal bridges, lagging chromosomes, micronuclei, monads, dyads and triads were found. The morphological analysis of the pollen, together with the above-mentioned 2n microspores, allowed us to confirm the presence of 2n pollen as well as its frequency. In both A. tequilana and A. angustifolia two different mechanisms were observed: the first mechanism, a failure in the cytokinesis in meiosis II caused the formation of dyads with two 2n cells and triads containing two n cells and one 2n cell; the second mechanism, involves an abnormal spindle, which caused the formation of triads with two n cells and one 2n cell. Likewise, the presence of monads was detected in both species, these, might be caused by a failure of the cytokinesis in both meiotic divisions. This is the first report about the presence of a Second Division Restitution mechanism (SDR) which causes the formation of 2n pollen in the genus Agave. The genetic implications of the presence of 2n pollen in the genus Agave are discussed.

Keywords

  • Agave
  • Microsporogenesis
  • Nuclear restitution
  • Unreduced gametes

Background

In plants, polyploidy represents an important adaptation and specialization mechanism, and it is estimated that more than 70% of all the angiosperms are polyploids (Ramsey and Schemske 1998; Otto 2007); likewise, molecular analyses suggest that most of the existing angiosperms (>90%) show one or several events of duplication of their genomes, of which many species have undergone this phenomenon only recently (Leitch and Leitch 2008). There are important crops which have some degree of ploidy, such as: cotton, wheat, canola, banana, coffee, tobacco, sugar cane, potato, and many other crops (Udall and Wendel 2006; Brownfield and Köller 2010).

One of the possible origins of the polyploid species is through unreduced gametes (2n) (Harlan and De Wet 1975), which occur in most angiosperms (Ramanna and Jacobsen 2003) and have a sporophytic chromosomal number instead of the gametophytic one. These can be formed during the microsporogenesis or megasporogenesis and it has been reported that the production of this type of 2n gametes is genetically controlled (Mok and Peloquin 1975) by genes which are highly influenced by environmental conditions such as temperature, hydric and nutritional stress (Ramsey and Schemske 1998).

Meiosis is a crucial process in the sexual reproduction of the eukaryotic species, whose purpose is to generate haploid gametes, which includes two successive divisions of the nucleus, where the first division is reductional and the second is equational; the failure of either the first or the second meiotic division leads to the formation of restituted nuclei and therefore the formation of 2n gametes, however, other possible routes have been proposed, such as: premeiotic failures, abnormal cytokinesis, post-meiotic doubling, the ovule's apomeiotic cells, being the irregular orientations of spindles and abnormal cytokinesis at the second meiotic division the most accepted nowadays (Zhang and Kang 2010). Cytological and genetic studies have proved that there are several mechanisms that are responsible for the formation of this type of 2n gametes, these mechanisms are known as: First Division Restitution (FDR), Second Division Restitution (SDR) and a third mechanism identified in inter-specific hybrids of the genus Lilium known as Indeterminate Meiotic Restitution (IMR) (Lim et al. 2001; Barba-Gonzalez et al. 2005; Zhou et al. 2008; Khan et al. 2010); the effects of the genetic load of these three mechanisms are different because of the different forms of segregation of the chromosomes, since, depending on the present restitution mechanism, the gametes deriving from these will have a different degree of heterozygosity; which means that gametes originated through FDR are identical to one another, maintaining the heterozygosity and the epistasis of their parents; gametes originated through SDR are heterogeneous and have a high homozygosity (Ramanna 1983), and the highest degree of heterogeneity is found in gametes originated through IMR, but since these gametes have a mixture of FDR and SDR, depending on the number of bivalents, the genetic consequences of it are more complex (Lim et al. 2001; Barba-Gonzalez et al. 2008).

Recently, it has been mentioned that in the genus Agave some of the species form 2n pollen (López-Díaz S, personal communication), however, the originating mechanisms have not been elucidated so far, but it is believed that through these gametes the different degrees of ploidy existing in the genus have been generated (Brandham 1969a; Castorena-Sanchez et al. 1991; Ruvalcaba-Ruiz and Rodríguez-Garay 2002; Robert et al. 2008). The genus Agave has a basic chromosome number x = 30 and has different degrees of ploidy. Through chromosome counting and flow cytometry, it has been determined that there are chromosomal numbers from 2n = 2x = 60 to 2n = 6x = 180 (Robert et al. 2008); chromosomal studies on the genus have reported it as a bimodal chromosomal model with a constant karyotype, and it has been observed that in the meiosis of A. tequilana Weber var. “azul” chromosomes form 30 bivalents (Ruvalcaba-Ruiz and Rodriguez-Garay 2002). Stebbins (1971) observed in this genus the highest degree of chromosomal asymmetry existing in spermatophytes.

The aim of this work was to elucidate the meiotic restitution mechanisms that are involved in the formation of 2n pollen in Agave tequilana and Agave angustifolia Haw (2n = 2x = 60).

In this study, we describe different abnormalities found in the microsporogenesis of Agave species, including dyads and triads; further, the morphological analysis of pollen allowed us to confirm the presence of 2n pollen. Finally, two different restitution mechanisms were identified which are involved in the formation of 2n gametes.

Results

Microsporogenesis analysis and restitution mechanisms

In the studied species of the genus Agave, a successive microsporogenesis, characteristic of this genus, was observed, where immediately after telophase I and telophase II a cytokinesis appears, which causes the formation of a dyad, and finally, a tetrad. During the cytological analysis of the pollen mother cells of A. tequilana as well as A. angustifolia, several abnormalities were found in both species, such as cells with one or several chromosomal bridges and one or more acentric fragments (Figure 1a), lagging chromosomes (Figure 1b) in both anaphase I and anaphase II as well as micronuclei in telophase I only in A. angustifolia var. “Lineño” (Figure 1c), which derived from the lagging chromosomes and/or from the acentric fragments which could not reach the poles and had a different chromosomal content.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Meiotic abnormalities found in A. tequilana and A. angustifolia. a Formation of a chromosomal bridge and a fragment in the same cell (arrowhead). b Lagging chromosomes at the center of the cell (arrowheads). c Three micronuclei with different chromosomal content (arrowheads). Scale bars: 20 μm.

In addition to these abnormalities, the presence of monads, dyads and triads could be observed as well as other products of meiosis. Monads and triads were found in both species while no dyads were observed in A. angustifolia var. “Cimarron”. The frequencies of monads and dyads were higher in A. angustifolia var. “Lineño”, while the frequency of triads was higher in A. angustifolia var. “Cimarron” (Table 1). Later on, during the analysis of the meiosis, the origin of the monads, dyads and triads was analyzed. In the cytological analysis of A. tequilana and A. angustifolia var. “Lineño”, some cells showed a normal first meiotic division, however, a failure in cytokinesis occurred in the second division which generated binucleated dyads (Figure 2a), which would later restitute and give rise to the formation of dyads and triads (Figure 2b-c); dyads were generated because of the absence of cytokinesis in both cells of the dyads, while triads were generated because of the absence of cytokinesis in one of the dyads cells.
Table 1

Observed frequencies of tetrads, triads, dyads and 2n pollen in two Agave species

Species

Total

Tetrads (%)

Triads (%)

Dyads (%)

Monads (%)

2n Pollen (%)

A. tequilana

1758

1688 (96)

18 (1)

34 (2)

18 (1)

3.2

A. angustifolia var. “Lineño”

3430

3274 (95.5)

8 (0.2)

104 (3)

44 (1.3)

2.0

A. angustifolia var. “Cimarrón”

736

725 (98.5)

8 (1.1)

-

3 (0.4)

1.2

Figure 2
Figure 2

Meiotic restitution mechanisms in A. tequilana and A. angustifolia. a Dyad with two binucleated microspores in A. angustifolia var. “Lineño”. b Dyad with two 2n cells in A. angustifolia var. “Lineño”. c Triad in A. angustifolia var. “Lineño”, with two n cells (arrowheads) and one 2n cell. d Formation of one 2n restituted nucleus (arrowhead) and two n nuclei (arrows) due to a perpendicular division plane in one of the chromosomal complements in A. angustifolia var. “Lineño”. e Start of cytokinesis in telophase I (arrowhead), the following stage of the one showed in d. f Triad in A. angustifolia var. “Lineño”, with two n cells (arrowheads) and one 2n cell in the following stage of e. g-h Dyad and triad found in A. tequilana. i 2n pollen (arrow), n pollen (arrowheads) and sterile pollen (asterisk) in A. tequilana. Scale bars: a-h 20 μm; i 100 μm.

Another mechanism of formation of triads in A. angustifolia var. “Lineño”, is through the cells which had an abnormal anaphase I, where, once the chromosomes had been reduced, a perpendicular division plane could be observed in one of the chromosomal complements which would be divided equationally (Figure 2d); this caused the formation of two n nuclei and one 2n nucleus in telophase I (Figure 2e); afterwards, the cell would undergo a cytokinesis is, which would cause the formation of a triad (Figure 2f, h). In general, in these species, the frequencies of dyads and triads were 0-3% and 0.2-1% respectively; while the frequency of monads was 0.4-1.3%. The presence of this type of cells indicates the existence of a restitution mechanism in the studied species.

2n pollen occurrence and frequency

Because of the presence of 2n cells in the cytological analysis, a morphological analysis of the pollen was carried out, which showed the presence of pollen grains of heterogeneous sizes in almost all of the analyzed plants in A. tequilana, A. angustifolia var. “Lineño” and A. angustifolia var. “Cimarron” (Figure 2i). The size of pollen grains varied in both species, in A. tequilana a range of 65-139 μm was observed with an average of 93.2 ± 11 μm; for A. angustifolia var. “Lineño”, a range of 65-135 μm with an average of 90.9 ± 6 μm; and for A. angustifolia var. “Cimarron”, a range of 70-155 μm and an average of 89 ± 7 μm respectively. The frequency of 2n pollen produced by individual plants ranged from 0-5.8%; in A. tequilana there were plants with a percentage of 0-5.8%, and an average of 3.2%; for A. angustifolia var. “Lineño”, there were plants with a percentage of 1.1-3.1%, and an average of 2.0%, and for A. angustifolia var. “Cimarron” plants with a percentage of 0-2.2% and an average of 1.2% (Table 1).

Discussion

The analysis of the meiosis in the genus Agave began with the studies carried by McKelvey and Sax (1933) and since then, several abnormalities found in the genus have been described (Vignoli 1936; Doughty 1936; Cave 1964; Brandham 1969a). The presence of chromosomal bridges in A. tequilana and A. angustifolia, have also been reported in other species of the genus Agave (Doughty 1936; Cave 1964; Brandham 1969a; Ruvalcaba-Ruiz and Rodriguez-Garay 2002). These bridges are caused mainly by heterozygous paracentric inversions (Brandham 1969b), or they are also caused by the breaking and fusion of chromatids (Newman 1966). Wang et al. (2010) mentioned that irregularities in chromosome pairing contribute to the production of lagging chromosomes and micronuclei; however, the absence of lagging chromosomes in A. tequilana and A. angustifolia var. “Cimarron” can be interpreted as that the lagging chromosomes joined the other chromosomes at the poles by the end of the anaphase, unlike A. angustifolia var. “Lineño”, where micronuclei with different chromosomal content were observed, which were derived from lagging chromosomes or from the breaking of the bridges at different points (Imery-Buiza 2007).

In A. angustifolia var. “Lineño”, cells showing an abnormal anaphase I were observed, and after the reductional division of the bivalents, and the separation of the homologous chromosomes, an abnormal spindle in one of the chromosomal complements appeared, which gave rise to a three nucleated cells in telophase I; after that, a cytokinesis is would take place, causing the formation of a triad. The presence of an abnormal and consecutive spindle is a very particular fact, since the formation of 2n microspores through an abnormal spindle is a mechanism that is completely different to the ones reported in many other species and where the abnormal spindles appear at the same time such as Zea mays (Clark 1940), Agropyrum cristatum (Tai 1970), Carthamus tinctorius (Carapetian and Rupert 1977), Fuchsia (Tilquin et al. 1984), Brassica napus, Brassica campestris (de Souza et al. 1999), Pfaffia glomerata, Pfaffia tuberosa, (Taschetto and Pagliarini 2003; Jiang et al. 2009). The presence of these abnormalities implies the formation of 2n gametes and/or polyads; although this type of spindles has also been found in both meiosis I and meiosis II (Risso-Pascotto et al. 2005).

Failure in cytokinesis is may give rise to nuclear restitution and therefore, the formation of 2n gametes. The absence of cytokinesis in A. tequilana and A. angustifolia var. “Lineño” in the second meiotic division caused the formation of dyads and triads, if the absence of cytokinesis was present in both cells of the dyad, then two restituted nuclei were generated and therefore, two 2n gametes; however, if the failure was present in only one of the cells of the dyad then a triad with two n gametes and one 2n gamete was produced. 2n microspores resulting from the absence of cytokinesis have been reported in several genera, such as Paspalum and Brachiaria (Pagliarini et al. 1999; Boldrini et al. 2006), Solanum spp. (Werner and Peloquin 1987), Lolium (Wagenvoort and Den Nijs 1992) and Medicago (Pfeiffer and Bingham 1983), where the failure in cytokinesis was present in both the first and second meiotic divisions, thus generating dyads and triads.

The occurrence of 2n pollen in a population can be identified by the presence of pollen 1.2-1.3 times larger than normal size, the presence of dyads and triads in the tetrad stage and the unexpected ploidy levels in the progeny from tetraploid-diploid crosses (Veilleux 1985). The occurrence of giant pollen found in this work, as well as the presence of dyads and triads, gave us an indication that the giant observed pollen, is 2n pollen, which is in accordance with López-Díaz S (personal communication). The morphological analysis of the pollen is the most direct method to determine the presence of 2n pollen, since by increasing the DNA content of a cell, then its size is larger (Bretagnolle and Thompson 1995); this method has been used as an indicator of the presence of 2n pollen in several species (Quinn et al. 1974; Ramanna 1983; Sala et al. 1989; Orjeda et al. 1990; Crespel et al. 2006).

Frequencies of 2n pollen of 1.2-3.2% are reported in this work, however, it was also observed that the frequency in the production of 2n pollen in individual plants varied, and even in some plants no 2n pollen was found; this fact has been reported in a large amount of works on diverse genera and species (Lolium perenne, Sala et al. 1989; Ipomoea trifida, Orjeda et al. 1990; Ipomoea batatas, Becerra Lopez-Lavalle and Orjeda 2002; Pfaffia glomerata, P. tuberosa, Taschetto and Pagliarini 2003; Populus tomentosa Carr, Zhang and Kang 2010), and it has also been reported that variation among individuals can be found within a single taxonomic group (Veilleux 1985) or even from one flower to another in an individual plant, or from one anther to another in the same flower bud (Bretagnolle and Thompson 1995). The identification of the mechanisms that generate 2n gametes is a complex subject, since different organisms of the same species can produce this kind of gametes through different mechanisms, and more than one mechanism can be present in the same individual plant (Parrot and Smith 1984; Werner and Peloquin 1991; Becerra Lopez-Lavalle and Orjeda 2002; Xu et al. 2008; Zhang and Kang 2010; Wang et al. 2010). A great variety of cytological mechanisms which are involved in the production of 2n gametes have been found. Bretagnolle and Thompson (1995) reported that the most frequent mechanisms are: failure of spindle in metaphase I or II, an abnormal geometry of the spindle in the second division, and an abnormal cytokinesis. The presence of an abnormal spindle after the chromosomal reduction in A. angustifolia var. “Lineño” and the failure in the cytokinesis in A. tequilana and A. angustifolia var. “Lineño” suggests the presence of a restitution mechanism of the second meiotic division (SDR), since the first meiotic division occurs in a normal way, and it is in the second division where such abnormalities are found. According to Mendiburu and Peloquin (1977) 2n gametes that are formed by FDR would theoretically transmit 80% of the heterozygosity from the parents to the progeny, and those formed by SDR would only transmit 40%; the reason for this is that in a SDR mechanism the gamete has the two sister chromatids, then, the progeny will have a lesser degree of heterozygosity and epistasis than the parents (Bretagnolle and Thompson 1995). Harlan and De Wet (1975) suggested that sexual polyploidization is the main mechanism in the origin and evolution of polyploids, so these facts corroborate that the evolution of the genus Agave may have occurred through 2n gametes, just as the existence of several degrees of ploidy. Although there are many known polyploid species so far, the reports about the presence of 2n pollen are much less; in the order Asparagales there are very few reports about the presence of 2n pollen, some examples are Asparagus and Narcissus (Camadro 1994; Wu et al. 2011); this is the first report of its kind in the Agavaceae family in which the presence of 2n pollen, its frequencies, as well as the mechanism through which this type of gametes are formed in A. tequilana and A. angustifolia are reported.

Conclusions

Nowadays, commercially important species of Agave propagate through suckers and clones obtained through tissue culture, resulting in lower variability compared with the propagation by seeds; the researchers have focused on identifying such variability according to the propagation mechanism involved in the cultivation, in order to develop programs of rehabilitation and conservation of genetic resources in the genus. However, an important alternative to these programs is the use of 2n pollen, whose presence has been reported in here and in many other genera, and its usefulness in breeding programs has been proven in several crops such potato (Mok and Peloquin 1975), rose (Crespel et al. 2006), lily (Barba-Gonzalez et al. 2004; Lim et al. 2004) and alfalfa (Tavoletti et al. 1991) among others. The importance of this report showing the presence of 2n pollen and the identification of the restitution mechanisms involved in 2n gamete formation in Agave species, provide basic knowledge for the development of crop improvement programs in the genus, as well as the theoretical effects of the mechanisms involved in the formation of these for Agave tequilana var. “azul” and gametes.

Methods

Plant material

Flower buds were collected in the Tequila Denomination of Origin Zone for Agave tequilana var. “azul” and in Toliman, Jalisco for Agave angustifolia var. “Lineño” and Agave angustifolia var. “Cimarron”. Voucher specimens for all collections were kept in Unidad de Biotecnología Vegetal at the Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A.C. (CIATEJ) Guadalajara, Mexico.

Microsporogenesis analyses

Flower buds were collected at various developmental stages and kept in ethanol: acetic acid (3:1) for at least 12 hours and stored at -20°C before the microscopic analysis. Flower buds were classified by size to determine the meiotic stage in the formation of the pollen. Afterwards, the anthers were extracted from the flower buds kept on the above mentioned fixative and rinsed with bidistilled water for 15 minutes, then they were put on a slide and macerated in one drop of aceto-orcein (1%) and finally covered with a cover slip for its observation under a microscope Leica model DMRA2. In mature buds the number of dyads, triads, tetrads and polyads were counted, and in immature buds, the meiosis process was studied, including abnormalities.

2n pollen occurrence and frequency

The mature pollen was dyed with aceto-orcein (1%) to calculate its average diameter and starting from this, the frequency of 2n pollen; when the diameter of the pollen grains was 1.2-1.4 times the average size of the n pollen, it was considered as 2n pollen (Quinn et al. 1974). Pollen grains were photographed using an Evolution QEi Camera (Media-Cybernetics) attached to the microscope and the measures of their diameter were taken with an Image-Pro® (Media-Cybernetics) software.

Abbreviations

FDR: 

First Division Restitution

IMR: 

Indeterminate Meiotic Restitution

SDR: 

Second Division Restitution

CIATEJ: 

Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A.C

Var: 

Variety.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank CONACYT-Mexico Grant 24554, who supported this research, and to Jose Manuel Rodriguez Dominguez for his technical assistance in the field. VMGR is a graduate student and financially supported by CONACYT-Mexico (Reg: 45382).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco, Unidad de Biotecnología Vegetal, Av. Normalistas No. 800, C.P. 44270, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

References

  1. Barba-Gonzalez R, Lokker AC, Lim KB, Ramanna MS, Van Tuyl JM: Use of 2n gametes for the production of sexual polyploids from sterile Oriental x Asiatic hybrids of lilies (Lilium). Theor Appl Genet 2004, 109: 1125-1132. 10.1007/s00122-004-1739-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Barba-Gonzalez R, Lim KB, Ramanna MS, Visser RGF, Van Tuyl JM: Intergenomic recombination in the F1 hybrids of Oriental x Asiatic lily hybrids (Lilium) and its significance for genetic variation in the BC1 progenies as revealed by GISH and FISH analyses. Genome 2005, 48: 884-894. 10.1139/g05-057View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Barba-Gonzalez R, Lim KB, Zhou S, Ramanna MS, Van Tuyl JM: Interspecfic hybridization in Lily: the use of 2n gametes in interspecific lily hybrids. In Floriculture, Ornamental and Plant Biotechnology: Advances and Topical Issues. 1st edition. Edited by: Silva JA T. Global Science Books, UK; 2008.Google Scholar
  4. Becerra Lopez-Lavalle LA, Orjeda G: Occurrence and cytological mechanism of 2n pollen formation in a tetraploid accession of Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato). J Hered 2002, 93: 185-192. 10.1093/jhered/93.3.185View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Boldrini KR, Pagliarini MS, Do Valle CB: Abnormal timing of cytokinesis in microsporogenesis in Brachiaria humidicola (Poaceae: Paniceae). J Genet 2006, 85: 225-228. 10.1007/BF02935337View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandham PE: Inversion heterozygosity and sub-chromatid exchanges in Agave stricta. Chromosoma 1969, 26: 270-286. 10.1007/BF00326522View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandham PE: Chromosome behaviour in the Aloineae. I. The nature and significance of E-type bridges. Chromosoma 1969, 27: 201-215. 10.1007/BF00326145View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Bretagnolle F, Thompson JD: Gametes with the somatic chromosome number: mechanisms of their formation and role in the evolution of autopolyploid plants. New Phytol 1995, 129: 1-22. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb03005.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Brownfield L, Köhler C: Unreduced gamete formation in plants: mechanisms and prospects. J Exp Bot 2010, 62: 1659-1668.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Camadro EL: Second meiotic division restitution (SDR) 2n pollen formation in diploid and hexaploid species of Asparagus. Genet Resour Crop Ev 1994, 41: 1-7. 10.1007/BF00051417View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Carapetian J, Rupert EA: Meiotic irregularities caused by interacting sterility genes in cultivated safflower (Carthamus tinctorius). Can J Genet Cytol 1977, 19: 103-109.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Castorena-Sánchez I, Escobedo RM, Quiroz A: New cytotaxonomical determinants recognized in six taxa of Agave in the sections Rigidae and Sisalanae. Can J Bot 1991, 69: 1257-1264. 10.1139/b91-163View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Cave MS: Cytological observations on some genera of the Agavaceae. Madroño 1964, 17: 163-169.Google Scholar
  14. Clark FJ: Cytogenetic studies of divergent meiotic spindle formation in Zea mays. Am J Bot 1940, 27: 547-559. 10.2307/2437090View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Crespel L, Ricci SC, Gudin S: The production of 2n pollen in rose. Euphytica 2006, 151: 155-164. 10.1007/s10681-006-9136-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. de Souza AM, Pagliarini MS, Carraro IM: Abnormal spindles in second meiosis in Canola (Brassica napus and Brassica campestris). Braz Arch Biol Technol 1999, 42: 47-52.Google Scholar
  17. Doughty LR: Chromosome behaviour in relation to genetics of Agave. I. Seven species of fibre Agave. J Genet 1936, 33: 198-205. 10.1007/BF02982532View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Harlan JR, deWet JMJ: On Ö. Winge and a prayer: the origins of polyploidy. Bot Rev 1975, 41: 361-690. 10.1007/BF02860830View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Imery-Buiza J: Inestabilidad cariológica durante la formación de células madres del polen en Aloe vera (Aloaceae). Rev Biol Trop (Int J Trop Biol) 2007, 55: 805-813.Google Scholar
  20. Jiang H, Wang FF, Wu YT, Zhou X, Huang XY, Zhu J, Gao JF, Dong RB, Cao KM, Yang ZN: Multipolar spindle1 (MPS1), a novel coiled-coil protein of Arabidopsis thaliana, is required for meiotic spindle organization. Plant J 2009, 59: 1001-1010. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03929.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Khan N, Barba-Gonzalez R, Ramanna MS, Arens P, Visser RGF, Van Tuyl JM: Relevance of unilateral and bilateral sexual polyploidization in relation to intergenomic recombination and introgression in Lilium species hybrids. Euphytica 2010, 171: 157-173. 10.1007/s10681-009-9998-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Leitch AR, Leitch IJ: Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants. Science 2008, 320: 481-483. 10.1126/science.1153585View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lim KB, Ramanna MS, de Jong JH, Jacobsen E, Van Tuyl JM: Indeterminate meiotic restitution (IMR): a novel type of meiotic nuclear restitution mechanism detected in interspecific lily hybrids by GISH. Theor Appl Genet 2001, 103: 219-230. 10.1007/s001220100638View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lim KB, Shen TM, Barba-Gonzalez R, Ramanna MS, Van Tuyl JM: Occurrence of SDR 2n gametes in Lilium hybrids. Breeding Sci 2004, 54: 13-18. 10.1270/jsbbs.54.13View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. McKelvey DS, Sax K: Taxonomic and cytological relationship of Yucca and Agave. J Arnold Arbor 1933, 14: 76-81.Google Scholar
  26. Mendiburu AO, Peloquin SJ: The significance of 2n gametes in potato breeding. Theor Appl Genet 1977, 49: 53-61. 10.1007/BF00275164View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Mok DWS, Peloquin SJ: The inheritance of three mechanisms of diplandroid (2n pollen) formation in diploid potatoes. Heredity 1975, 35: 295-302. 10.1038/hdy.1975.100View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Newman LJ: Bridge and fragment aberrations in Podophyllum peltatum. Genetics 1966, 53: 55-63.Google Scholar
  29. Orjeda G, Freyre R, Iwanaga M: Production of 2n pollen in diploid Ipomoea trifida, a putative wild ancestor of sweet potato. J Hered 1990, 81: 462-467.Google Scholar
  30. Otto SP: The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell 2007, 131: 452-462. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Pagliarini MS, Takayama SY, de Freitas PM, Carraro LR, Adamowski EV, Silva N, Batista LAR: Failure of cytokinesis and 2n gamete formation in Brazilian accessions of Paspalum. Euphytica 1999, 108: 129-135. 10.1023/A:1003660327223View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Parrot WA, Smith RR: Production of 2n pollen in red clover. Crop Sci 1984, 24: 469-472. 10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400030009xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Pfeiffer TW, Bingham ET: Abnormal meiosis in alfalfa, Medicago sativa: cytology of 2n egg and 4n pollen formation. Can J Genet Cytol 1983, 25: 107-112.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Quinn AA, Mok DWS, Peloquin SJ: Distribution and significance of diplandroids among the diploid Solanums. Am Potato J 1974, 51: 16-21. 10.1007/BF02852024View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramanna MS: First division restitution gametes through fertile desynaptic mutants of potato. Euphytica 1983, 32: 337-350. 10.1007/BF00021442View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Ramanna MS, Jacobsen E: Relevance of sexual polyploidization for crop improvement – A review. Euphytica 2003, 133: 3-18. 10.1023/A:1025600824483View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramsey J, Schemske DW: Pathways, mechanisms and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1998, 29: 467-501. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.467View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Risso-Pascotto C, Pagliarini MS, Borges Do Valle C: Multiple spindles and cellularization during microsporogenesis in an artificially induced tetraploid accession of Brachiaria ruziziensis (Gramineae). Plant Cell Rep 2005, 23: 522-527. 10.1007/s00299-004-0867-yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Robert ML, Lim KY, Hanson L, Sánchez-Teyer F, Bennett MD, Leitch AR, Leitch IJ: Wild and agronomically important Agave species (Asparagaceae) show proportional increases in chromosome number, genome size, and genetic markers with increasing ploidy. Bot J Linn Soc 2008, 158: 215-222. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2008.00831.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruvalcaba-Ruiz D, Rodríguez-Garay B: Aberrant meiotic behavior in Agave tequilana Weber var. azul. BMC Plant Biol 2002, 2: 10-14. 10.1186/1471-2229-2-10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Sala CA, Camadro EL, Salaberry MT, Mendiburu AO: Cytological mecanism of 2n pollen formation and unilateral sexual polyploidization in Lolium. Euphytica 1989, 43: 1-6. 10.1007/BF00037889View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Stebbins GL: Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd, London; 1971.Google Scholar
  43. Tai W: Multipolar meiosis in diploid crested wheatgrass, Agropyron cristatum. Am J Bot 1970, 57: 1160-1169. 10.2307/2441354View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Taschetto OM, Pagliarini MS: Occurrence of 2n and jumbo pollen in the Brazilian ginseng (Pfaffia glomerata and P. tuberosa). Euphytica 2003, 133: 139-145. 10.1023/A:1025683511162View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Tavoletti S, Mariani A, Veronesi F: Cytological analysis of macro- and microsporogenesis of a diploid alfalfa clone producing male and female 2n gametes. Crop Sci 1991, 31: 1258-1263. 10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100050035xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Tilquin JP, de Brouwer K, Horvat F: Unusual cytological patterns in microsporogenesis in a cultivar of Fuchsia. 1. Multiple spindle. Theor Appl Genet 1984, 67: 413-417.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Udall JA, Wendel JF: Polyploidy and crop improvement. Crop Sci 2006, 46: S3-S14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Veilleux R: Diploid and polyploid gametes in crop plants: mechanisms of formation and utilization in plant breeding. In Plant Breeding Reviews. Edited by: Janick J. Wiley, Hoboken; 1985:253-288.Google Scholar
  49. Vignoli L: Cariologia del genere Agave. Lay R Ist Bot Palermo 1936, 7: 176-217.Google Scholar
  50. Wagenvoort M, Den Nijs APM: Implications of 2n pollen for breeding tetraploid perennial ryegrass. In Gametes with somatic chromosome number in the evolution and breeding of polyploid polysomic species: achievements and perspectives. Edited by: Mariani A, Tavoletti S. Tipolitografia Porziuncola, Perugia; 1992.Google Scholar
  51. Wang J, Kang X, Zhu Q: Variation in pollen formation and its cytological mechanism in an allotriploid white poplar. Tree Genet Genomes 2010, 6: 281-290. 10.1007/s11295-009-0248-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Werner JE, Peloquin SJ: Frequency and mechanisms of 2n egg formation in haploid tuberosum-wild species Fl hybrids. Am J Potato Res 1987, 64: 641-654. 10.1007/BF02853909View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Werner JE, Peloquin SJ: Occurrence and mechanisms of 2n egg formation in 2x potato. Genome 1991, 34: 975-982. 10.1139/g91-150View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Wu H, Ramanna MS, Arens P, Van Tuyl JM: Genome constitution of Narcissus variety, ‘Tête-à-Tête’, analysed through GISH and NBS profiling. Euphytica 2011, 181: 285-292. 10.1007/s10681-011-0438-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Xu LQ, Zhang QL, Luo ZR: Occurrence and cytological mechanism of 2n pollen formation in Chinese Diospyros spp. (Ebenaceae) staminate germplasm. J Hortic Sci Biotech 2008, 83: 668-672.Google Scholar
  56. Zhang Z, Kang X: Cytological characteristics of numerically unreduced pollen production in Populus tomentosa Carr. Euphytica 2010, 173: 151-159. 10.1007/s10681-009-0051-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhou S, Ramanna MS, Visser RGF, Van Tuyl JM: Genome composition of triploid lily cultivars derived from sexual polyploidization of Longiflorum x Asiatic hybrids (Lilium). Euphytica 2008, 160: 207-215. 10.1007/s10681-007-9538-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Gómez-Rodríguez et al.; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement