Open Access

Sociomicrobiome of wood decay in a tropical rain forest: unraveling complexity

  • Tasha M Santiago-Rodriguez1,
  • Gary A Toranzos1,
  • Paul Bayman1,
  • Steven E Massey1 and
  • Raul J Cano2, 3Email author

DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-435

Received: 26 June 2013

Accepted: 15 August 2013

Published: 4 September 2013


Given that microbial interactions in nature are very complex, we propose that quorum-sensing, as well as quorum-quenching, phenazine and secondary metabolite production, resistance and toxin-antitoxin systems within a microbial community should all comprise the battery of processes involving the study of what we would define as the “sociomicrobiome”. In the present study the genes/molecules, subsystems and taxonomic breakup of the mentioned processes were identified in decaying tropical wood from the El Yunque rainforest in Puerto Rico, and soil using a shotgun metagenomic approach. The rapid decomposition of wood and litter in tropical regions suggests that processes in these settings are governed by unexplored microbes with the potential of being further studied and exploited for various purposes. Both ecosystems were characterized by the presence of specific genes/molecules, subsystems and microbes associated with the mentioned processes, although the average abundances for specific processes differed. Of the sociomicrobiomes studied, that from El Yunque was found to be the most complex. The approach considered in the present study could also be applied to study the sociomicrobiome of other ecosystems.


Phenazines Quorum-sensing Quorum-quenching Resistance Secondary metabolites Toxin-antitoxin systems


There is an increasing interest towards microbial communication in natural settings (Furhman, 2009). Despite being a highly complex process, microbial communication has been mainly associated with quorum-sensing (QS) (Bassler, 1999). Microbial communication is mediated by acylated homoserine lactones (AHLs) and autoinducer-2 (AI-2) in bacteria, and farnesol in fungi (Decanis et al., 2011;Winker et al., 2003). Aromatic compounds and compounds that have antibiotic activity may also be involved in microbial communication in natural settings, although the latter remains a matter of further research (Romero et al., 2011). Microbial communication can be disrupted by acylases, lactonases or nucleosidases, a process known as quorum-quenching (QQ) (Sio et al., 2006). Other molecules, such as the phenazines, can act in promoting or disrupting microbial communication (Pierson and Pierson, 2010). More interesting perhaps is the effect that microbial communication may have on gene expression. This in turn may alter the abundance and diversity of microbial communities in natural settings. An example of such genes is the toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems, essential for various processes in bacteria (Engelberg-Kulka et al. 2005), (2006).

Most studies so far have focused on specific molecules involved in microbial communication and thus often ignore the overall complexity of this process. QS, QQ, secondary metabolite and antibiotic production, and TA systems are part of the complex microbial interactions in nature. We believe that a battery of the processes described in the present study can be attributed to what we would call the “sociomicrobiome”. Sociomicrobiome will be defined as the microbes (bacteria and fungi) and the genes/molecules involved in promoting or disrupting communication in environmental processes. As we define it, studies of the sociomicrobiome of an ecosystem may provide better insights into the ecology and “social behavior” of microorganisms, both within and between species. Similar terms were originally coined to define the association of QS with biofilm formation (as in the case of “sociomicrobiology”), and the abundance of microbes, their genes and interactions in an ecosystem (as in the case of “microbiome”) (Parsek and Greenberg, 2005;Gill et al., 2006). Studies regarding the microbiome consider mostly the abundance and diversity of bacteria (Gill et al., 2006). These studies often ignore the role of other microbes (e.g. fungi) and the genes/molecules involved in their interactions with the surrounding environment and as possible regulators of specific population sizes within a community.

Decaying wood and soils could be a reference for studies regarding the sociomicrobiome, but it should be noted that any ecosystem may possess its unique sociomicrobiome. Processes taking place in these settings are characterized by unique and complex microbial communities (DeAngelis et al., 2011). Tropical wood and humid tropical forest soils have fast decomposition rates, suggesting that wood decomposition, as well as processes in soils present in tropical regions are governed by microorganisms with novel and specific pathways (DeAngelis et al., 2011). However, little is known in terms of the source of these microorganisms, which in many cases degrade complex polymers in a specific order; we hypothesize that most, if not all of these microorganisms are present at all times in the ecosystem being studied. It would seem that the cell/species densities change, as conditions/substrate types change. Thus, all of these microorganisms would have to respond to a “social environment” modulated by the cells, conditions and substrates present. In the present study, we determined the abundance of genes and molecules involved in microbial communication (AHL synthases, LuxR, AI-2, TraR and phenazines), inhibition of such (AHL acylases, AHL lactonases, AI-2 nucleosidases and cdr1), antibiotic-resistance (as a possible indicator of the production of antibiotics in nature), secondary metabolite production and TA systems in decaying wood and tropical soils by using a comparative metagenomics approach as a first step in the elucidation of a sociomicrobiome present in ecosystems where complex polymers are being degraded.

Materials and methods

Sample description and preparation

The sample (EY log) was collected at the El Verde Field Station of the UPR, located in the El Yunque National Forest in northeastern Puerto Rico (18°20' N, 65°49' W). It is a mature secondary forest classified as Subtropical Wet in the Holdridge Life Zone classification, about 550 masl and with 3500 mm annual rainfall (Thompson et al. 2002), and is the only tropical rainforest in the US National Forest system. It is a highly diverse forest dominated by tabonuco (Dacryodes excelsa, Burseraceae). Tabonuco is an evergreen tree to 40 m notable for production of terpinoid-rich resin. It is likely that the log we sampled is D. excelsa, based on wood color and texture and location, but the log was too degraded to be identified.

Genomic DNA was extracted using the PowerSoil® DNA Isolation Kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Three replicate DNA samples were pooled in order to obtain a homogeneous representation of DNA. DNA concentration and quality were estimated spectrophotometrically and by agarose gel electrophoresis in a 0.8% agarose gel, respectively.

Metagenome sequencing and analysis

Purified genomic DNA from the EY log was prepared for shotgun metagenomics library construction as indicated by the DOE Joint Genome Institute standard operating procedure for shotgun sequencing using the Roche 454 GS FLX Titanium technology (Branford, CT). Raw sequence data was prepared for uploading into the MG-RAST server by removing: replicates; first four nucleotides of each sequence; sequences with average q value < 15; sequences with more than 10 Ns; sequences with a tail of ≥ 10 Ns; and sequences with % N > 4. Following this preliminary quality filtering the raw FASTA file was uploaded in the MG-RAST server for further filtering, analysis and annotation. The filtering parameters used are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Filtering parameters used for El Yunque log metagenome




Length filtering

Standard deviation multiplicator for length cutoff


Ambiguous base filtering

Maximum number of allowed ambiguous base pairs


Dynamic trimming

Lowest phred score counted as high quality base


Trim number of bases in low quality sequences



Remove artificial replicate sequences



Remove host-specific sequences

H. sapiens NCBI v36

Searches for each gene/molecule and functions were performed in the decaying log metagenome and a metagenomic dataset derived from soil obtained from Luquillo, in the foothills of the El Yunque forest (MG-RAST ID 4446153.3) using MG-RAST. Similarity searches at MG-RAST allow retrieving similarities to databases such as NCBI, PATRIC, KEGG, SEED and RefSeq. Results were acquired by the “Best Hit” and “Search Function” options. QS and QQ gene function in both ecosystems were compared using Multidimensional scaling (MDS) analyses, constructed using a resemblance matrix of Bray-Curtis similarities (Primer E software v. 6) (Clarke and Gorley, 2006). All data considered in the present study are freely available in MG-RAST (e.g. Waseca soil, Waseca County, Minnesota, United States) (Table 2).
Table 2

Comparative taxonomic and functional diversity metrics for selected metagenomes






Fisher’s α

H' (loge)3










El Yunque log











Agricultural soil










Temperate soil










Tropical soil





















Coral reef atoll










Antarctic Lake










Microbial Mats






















Cow rumen










Combined rumen










Termite gut










Canine gut










VW Pig gut










1S = total species.

2Margalef’s species richness where d = (S-1)/logeN for S = total number of species and N = total individuals.

3Shannon Diversity Index where H’ = - Σ Pi loge(Pi).

4Diversity metrics based on abundance of secondary metabolism genes in metagenome.


Uniqueness of decaying wood

To put the diversity of the EY metagenome in perspective, it was compared to shotgun metagenomes from soil, aquatic systems, mats, and gut microbiota (Table 2). Although these metagenomes differ in substrate, sampling depth, study design and methodology, some trends are apparent. The EY metagenome was highest in number of species predicted, Margalef’s species richness index, and Fisher’s ɑ and Shannon’s diversity indices. Both Fisher's ɑ and Shannon’s diversity indices take account of richness and evenness, but Shannon’s is more sensitive to richness. This is especially relevant for metagenomes, whose richness is generally higher than traditional biodiversity studies because of sampling depth. As Table 2 shows, both predicted richness and evenness in a rotting log are comparable to or higher than better-known, complex microbial systems. A point to note is that taxonomic diversity may be influenced by bias in the microbial genomes present in the database, given that for shotgun metagenomes taxonomic affiliation is determined by similarity to sequences present in the non-redundant database, given differences in the representation of different microbial groups in the different samples. This concern will be reduced as a more even sequencing coverage of microbial taxa is accomplished. An additional strategy to characterize complexity is to assess the diversity of the enzymes involved in secondary metabolism. Here, homologs present in each sample can be determined with a degree of certainty and their function inferred from sequence similarity. Biases in terms of genes present in the database are likely to affect all taxa in the samples equally. Given the taxonomic richness and evenness, microbial crosstalk is not surprising. When just the environmental metagenomes were considered, there was a significant, negative correlation between Shannon’s index and latitude (R2= 0.54, F=8.30, P=0.02). Intriguingly, this mirrors the negative correlation observed between plant and animal diversity and latitude. However, further work will be necessary to verify this observation, as it appears to contradict previous results on microbial diversity (Fierer and Jackson 2005).

Quorum-sensing and quorum-quenching taxonomic breakup

QS and QQ genes function subsystems were compared to those of the Luquillo and Waseca soils and composites (Figure 1). The subsystems from the Luquillo and Waseca soils showed a similarity of 85% and the composite and EY log grouped separately. Taxonomic breakup (by class and species) of the QS and QQ genes in the EY log and Luquillo soil are presented in Table 3. The Alphaproteobacteria, in both the decaying log and tropical soil, accounted for sequences encoding for AHL synthases and LuxR. Sequences in the decaying log were similar to that present in Phenylobacterium zucineum, while luxR was similar to that present in Sinorhizobium fredii (61). In the tropical soil, species related to Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Sulfitobacter spp. accounted for the AHL synthase- and LuxR-encoding genes. The Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Cytophagia accounted for the AHL acylases and lactonases and AI-2 nucleosidases sequences in the decaying log. The Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria and Actinobacteria harbored genes encoding for QQ molecules in the tropical soil. In terms of cdr1, detection was restricted to the decaying log.
Figure 1

Principal component analysis of quorum-sensing and quorum-quenching subsystems in decaying log, soils and compost.

Table 3

Taxonomic breakdown of quorum-sensing and quorum-quenching genes in decaying log and tropical soil metagenomes






Average identity (%)

Quorum-sensing and quorum-quenching decaying wood

AHL synthase


Phenylobacterium zucineum






Sinorhizobium fredii




AHL acylase


Citromicrobium bathyomarinum






Pseudomonas aeruginosa




AHL lactonase


Rhodococcus erythropolis




AI-2 nucleosidase


Asticcacaulis excentricus






Dyadobacter fermentans






Arthroderma gypseum




Quorum-sensing and quorum-quenching tropical soil

AHL synthase


Rhodobacter sphaeroides






Sulfitobacter sp. NAS-14.1






Rhodobacter sphaeroides






Sulfitobacter sp. NAS-14.1




AHL acylase


Pseudomonas fluorescens






Pseudomonas putida




AHL lactonase


Rhodococcus erythropolis





Rhodococcus opacus




AI-2 nucleosidase


Burkholderia graminis






Burkholderia sp. CCGE1001






Variovorax paradoxus










ND=not detected.

In contrast to the mentioned QS and QQ molecules, traR (Figure 2) and AI-2 synthases (Figure 3) were detected in more bacterial groups. In the decaying log and soil, the Alphaproteobacteria accounted for the highest abundance of traR (70 and 35%, respectively). In soil, particularly, unclassified bacteria (derived from the Acidobacteria), the Deltaproteobacteria and Chloroflexi accounted for the highest abundances of traR. The Alphaproteobacteria were the most abundant group harboring genes responsible for the synthesis of AI-2 in the decaying log (70%) and soil (35%), followed by the Solibacteres. The decaying log was characterized by the Opitutae and unclassified bacteria (derived from the Verrucomicrobia) and both groups did not show to harbor AI-2 genes in soil. The Actinobacteria and Planctomyceta accounted for AI-2 synthase genes in soil, particularly.
Figure 2

Average abundances (%) of traR in decaying log and tropical soils. Taxonomic breakup was performed by class.

Figure 3

Average abundances (%) of AI-2 synthases in decaying log and tropical soils. Taxonomic breakup was performed by class.

Taxonomic breakup of phenazines

The taxonomic breakup (by class) of phenazines in the decaying log and soil are presented in Figure 4. The Alphaproteobacteria accounted for the highest abundance of phenazines in the decaying log and soil (48 to 50%). In both ecosystems, unclassified bacteria (derived from the Acidobacteria), Actinobacteria and Deltaproteobacteria were responsible for the presence of genes encoding for phenazines as well. In the decaying log, these bacterial groups accounted for lower abundances of phenazine genes when compared to soil. The Betaproteobacteria and Thermomicrobia (< 5%) accounted for the presence of phenazine genes in soil. Interestingly, fungi from the Sordariomycetes, a group involved in wood decomposition, harbored phenazine genes in the decaying log and this was not noted for the soil sample.
Figure 4

Phenazines average abundances (%) in decaying log and tropical soils. Taxonomic breakup was performed by class.

Metabolism of aromatic compounds subsystems and taxonomic breakup

Metabolism of aromatic compounds subsystems are shown in Figure 5. Genes responsible for peripheral pathways for catabolism of aromatic compounds in the decaying log and soil were present in an average abundance of 40%. The average abundance of sequences accounting for the anaerobic degradation of aromatic compounds in the decaying log and soil were 35 and 10%, respectively. Benzoate transport and degradation genes were detected in average abundances of 15 and 7% in the decaying log and soil, respectively. Interestingly, genes accounting for the metabolism of central aromatic intermediates were present in higher abundances in soil (35%), compared to the decaying log (5%).
Figure 5

Metabolism of aromatic compounds in decaying log and tropical soils. Average abundances (%) of the subsystems are shown.

The taxonomic breakup (by class) of genes involved in the metabolism of aromatic compounds is shown in Figure 6. In these subsystems, the Alphaproteobacteria accounted for the highest abundances in the decaying log (45%) and soil (32%), followed by the Betaproteobacteria (approximately 10%) and unassigned bacteria (10 to 15%). Similarly to phenazines in the decaying log, the Sordariomycetes harboring genes involved in the metabolisms of aromatic compounds were only present in the decaying log.
Figure 6

Average abundances (%) of microorganisms involved in the metabolism of aromatic compounds. Taxonomic breakup was performed by class.

Resistance subsystems and taxonomic breakup

Various resistance subsystems were present in both the decaying log and soil (Figure 7). Subsystems of cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance accounted for the highest abundances in both the decaying log (approximately 20%) and soil (40%). Sequences accounting for the cation efflux system protein CusA were present in the decaying log and soil (approximately 20 and 17%). Polymyxin resistance protein ArnT was present in both ecosystems as well (<1%). Interestingly, acriflavin resistance was only present in the decaying log (approximately 10%). Other resistance subsystems were present in both ecosystems in abundances of <1%, but overall, these accounted for approximately 35 and 10% of the resistance gene sequences in the decaying log and soil, respectively.
Figure 7

Resistance subsystems in decaying log and tropical soils. Average abundances (%) of the subsystems are shown.

The taxonomic breakup (by class) of microbes responsible for the resistance subsystems are shown in Figure 8. The Alphaproteobacteria (41 and 32%), Betaproteobacteria (10%), Gammaproteobacteria (10 and 6%) and unassigned (10 and 16%) bacteria accounted for the highest abundances of resistance subsystems in the decaying log and the tropical soil. Interestingly, the Sordariomycetes (4%) were restricted to the decaying log, while the Planctomycetia and unclassified bacteria derived from the Cyanobacteria were restricted to soil (2%).
Figure 8

Average abundances (%) of microorganisms exhibiting resistance mechanisms. Taxonomic breakup was performed by class.

TA subsystems

The decaying log exhibited the presence of more TA system subsystems compared to the tropical soil (Figure 9). The toxin part of the PhD/Doc and VapC/VapB systems represented the highest abundances of TA toxins in the decaying log and soil (20 and 15%, respectively). Although the Doc and VapC toxins were not detected in the tropical soil, the antitoxin part, PhD and VapB, were present in this ecosystem (approximately 18%), as well as in the decomposing log (approximately 8 to 10%, respectively). Interestingly, the HigA antitoxin accounted for the highest abundance of a TA system subsystem in soil (50%) (10% in the decaying log), while the toxin part, HigB, was not detected in soil. A similar outcome was noted with the MazEF and MazEF-like TA systems, characteristic of Escherichia coli, in which the antitoxin part was detected in soil, while the toxin element was absent.
Figure 9

Toxin-antitoxin (TA) gene subsystems in decaying log and tropical soils. Average abundances (%) of the subsystems are shown.

As with other genes/molecules in the present study, the Alphaproteobacteria accounted for the highest abundances of TA systems in the decaying log and soil (Figure 10). Unassigned, Betaproteobacteria and the Gammaproteobacteria are among the groups harboring TA systems in both ecosystems. Unclassified bacteria (Acidobacteria) and Chloroflexi accounted for TA systems specifically in the decaying log and soil, respectively.
Figure 10

Average abundances (%) of microorganisms harboring TA systems. Taxonomic breakup was performed by class.


The present study determined the abundance of genes/molecules, subsystems and taxa of microbes involved in wood decomposition and soil in an attempt to provide a wider view of the possible interactions. The distinctiveness of the subsystems in the decaying log (when compared to soil), clearly supports the uniqueness of the microbial communities in this setting. Moreover, the separate clustering of the EY log and composite sample supports the uniqueness of the decaying wood as well. Composite was chosen as a reference sample microbial processes in this type of sample could be very similar to those taking place in decaying wood (Miyatake and Iwabuchi, 2006). Although this was not the case, it is possible that the microbial communities at another step of composite decomposition may be similar to the microbial processes in decaying wood. Notably, calculated diversity indexes suggest that microbial diversity is generally higher in the tropics. However, this point is still unresolved; latitude may place an upper limit on microbial diversity but is not believed to be the primary determinant. QS subsystems of tropical soils exhibited a similarity of 80% with the Waseca soil. This suggests that certain QS subsystems may be conserved while individual species may differ, and is analogous to the conservation of homologous protein structures, while the respective amino acid sequences may vary considerably.

Wood is structurally complex, and its decomposition involves a succession of different groups of organisms. Degradation of components of wood by one organism provides substrates for other organisms (for example, cleavage of lignocellulose by white rot fungi liberates sugars and makes other components accessible), so it can be viewed as a collaborative process. Furthermore, there is spatial delimitation of territory by competing organisms, often intraspecific, and is easily observed as melanized lines of interaction in decaying wood. Parasitism of one guild of wood-decay organisms by others is also common. Given this combination of succession, collaboration, competition and parasitism, it is not surprising that we found evidence of extensive microbial crosstalk in decaying wood.

These types of ecological interaction will depend on the net costs and benefits from the association and will change continuously. For instance, certain intestinal microbes produce metabolites for the benefit of other microbes in mutualistic interaction. It has been suggested that microbes can be “forced” into such interactions by specific mechanisms of QS. This scenario can certainly be applied to decaying wood and soils. Secondary metabolites (as those involved in QS) promote the expression of specific genes involved in processes that occur in wood decomposition and in soil. This genetic expression, which results in specific types of coordinated behaviors, may promote higher abundances of certain microbes. The reason is that the synthesis of molecules that could be beneficial for the proliferation and persistence of specific microbial populations may also be harmful for others (Zhu et al. 1998). Similar outcomes have been reported for activated sludge, in which AHLs mediate the composition and function of the microbial communities. Moreover, microorganisms may also exhibit signal-quenching mechanisms, resistance to antibiotics, toxins and other secondary metabolites, resulting in even more complex interactions. All these processes may have developed in particular microbes that act in specific pathways of wood decomposition and in complex processes in soils.

Mechanisms of microbial communication

The present study is comparable with previous reports of the presence of AHL synthases and LuxR in the Alphaproteobacteria (Koch et al., 2005;Lindum et al., 1998). Even though the bacterial classes were identical in the decaying log and soil, the bacterial species were different. Species related to Phenylobacterium zucineum and Sinorhizobium fredii accounted for AHL synthase genes and luxR in the decaying log, respectively. P. zucineum is an intracellular facultative bacterium recently isolated from the human leukemia cell line K562 (Luo et al., 2008). A similar outcome was noted with S. fredii, which has been characterized as a symbiont of legumes (Krishnan et al., 2003). The presence of these microbes in the log is surprising, but could suggest a possible new role for these bacteria in wood decomposition. The roles of species related to R. sphaeroides or Sulfitobacter spp. in the tropical soil remain to be addressed as well, but these bacteria possess diverse metabolic capabilities and include photosynthesis and nitrogen fixation (as in the case of R. sphaeroides) and chemoorganotrophy (as with Sulfitobacter spp.) (Long et al., 2011;Poole et al., 1989). The particular role of species related to S. fredii in soil represents a matter of further research since these bacteria have been particularly characterized in marine environments. Notably, bacteria harboring AHL synthase genes did not harbor LuxR in the decaying log, and this was not the case for bacteria in the tropical soil. In soil, the same bacterial species accounted for the presence of both AHL synthase genes and luxR. These results suggest that the AHL synthase genes in the decaying log may be luxI homologues. In terms of traR (a homologue of luxR), this gene has been mainly identified in Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which belong to the Alphaproteobacteria. Consistent with previous studies, the highest traR-encoding bacterial abundances in both ecosystems corresponded to the Alphaproteobacteria. Yet, its presence in several bacterial groups was unexpected, suggesting that these sequences may be homologues of traR (Zhu et al., 2011;Swiderska et al., 2001). Bacterial groups harboring genes responsible for the synthesis of AI-2 were more diverse, supporting the universality of this molecule.

Inhibition of microbial communication

More interesting is the greater diversity of bacteria harboring QQ genes. The Alphaproteobacteria (closest match to Citromicrobium bathyomarinum), as reservoirs of AHL acylase genes, were restricted to the decaying log, suggesting a specific role for these microbes in wood decomposition. Similarly, the Gammaproteobacteria accounted for the presence of AHL acylase genes in the decaying log (closest match to Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and soil (species related to Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas putida), and similar outcomes were noted with the AHL lactonase genes, which were restricted to the Actinobacteria (species related to Rhodococcus spp.) in both ecosystems. In terms of the AI-2 nucleosidases, the decaying log and soil were characterized by the Alphaproteobacteria and Cytophagia, and the Betaproteobacteria, respectively. This indicates that a greater diversity of bacteria (although different groups) may be involved in quenching the signal produced by bacteria harboring genes responsible for the synthesis of AI-2.

Inhibition of AHL and AI-2 molecules may not represent the only QQ pathways in the ecosystems tested. Results showed that the metabolism of aromatic compounds is well represented in the decaying log and soil. Some aromatic compounds may serve as signaling molecules in microbial communication, as in the case of autoinducer-3, involved in interkingdom signaling; hence, degradation of such signals is feasible (Zhu et al., 1998). Notably, genes involved in the anaerobic degradation of aromatic compounds were more abundant in the decaying log compared to soil, and this is supported by the water-logged nature of the sample.

Little is known about QS in fungi, and certainly less is known about possible QQ signaling pathways. Farnesol has been associated with the overexpression of specific genes, such as cdr1, in fungi of clinical importance (e.g. C. albicans) (Westwater et al., 2005). cdr1 encodes for efflux pumps and its over-expression is considered to be a drug resistance mechanism in C. albicans (Decanis et al. 2011). The presence of cdr1 in species related to Arthroderma gypseum in the decaying log was surprising since this gene has been mainly associated with C. albicans. Cdr1 is a homologue of Mrp1, specific for mammalian cells; therefore, it remains feasible that cdr1 related to A. gypseum represents a homologue of cdr1 present in C. albicans.

Phenazines as mediators of microbial communication

Phenazines are produced by many bacteria that are associated with a host, but less is known about fungi as phenazine-producers (Pierson and Pierson, 2010). In the present study, fungi from the Sordariomycetes accounted for the presence of phenazines in the decaying log and not in the soil. This suggests that the production of phenazines by fungi may be important for wood decomposition and opens the opportunity to characterize their role as phenazine-producers in natural settings. Phenazines were also present in the tropical soil tested and this is consistency with previous reports (Pierson and Pierson, 2010). In humid forests, respiration by microbes and plant roots may limit the availability of oxygen as an electron acceptor. This, in turn, is consistent with the water logged nature of the log from which the dataset was generated.

Resistance mechanisms

Resistance could be the result of the complex microbial interactions in nature. For instance, cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance was noted in both the decaying log and soil, with greater representation in the soil. This may reflect the higher concentrations of these divalent cations in soil. Results show that ion-resistance in the decaying log and soil is present in various microbial communities, which are not limited to bacteria as fungi have also exhibited resistance to ions (Nies, 1992). Similarly, the presence of genes encoding for multidrug-resistance in pristine environments (as those considered in the present study), supports that antibiotic production is not restricted to clinical settings.

TA systems

TA systems in the decaying wood were more represented than in soil, suggesting that wood decomposition may require the action of a higher diversity of microbes. Several functions have been attributed to the TA systems identified in the decaying log and soil and include: PCD (as in the case of mazEF) (Hazan et al., 2001), persistency and growth control (as with phd/doc) (Magnuson, 2007). PCD in the late stages of wood decomposition and in soil can be the result of the competition for specific nutrients and space and implies a threshold density of related microbes present in the microhabitat. PCD may be induced by antagonistic interactions with competitors.


To our knowledge, this is the first study that has identified genes/molecules, subsystems and microbial taxa which could be considered part of the sociomicrobiome of decaying wood and soils using a metagenomics approach. Other genes, subsystems and microbes can certainly be included in the complex battery of studies regarding the sociomicrobiome. The comparative metagenomic approach in the present study provides ample information on the complex network and interactions of microbes in the considered settings. We present valuable information regarding the microbial ecology of both wood decomposition at its late stages, and that of soil. Results open the opportunity to focus on the expression of specific genes at late stages of wood decomposition, and characterize the molecules associated with the sociomicrobiome of decaying wood and soil. The approach considered here could be applied to study the sociomicrobiome of wood decomposition at earlier stages as well, providing a wider view of the succession of microbes involved in the process.

Given the complexity of the microbial interactions in the ecosystems described here, and the diversity of microbes present, a pertinent question then arises of how microbes detect self (genetically related individuals) from non-self, and how potential mutualistic partners are distinguished from potential competitors. How microbes determine genetically unrelated friend from foe by using non-universal signaling molecules is not clear. Although the presented results are part of the multi microbial interactions that may be involved in wood decay and soil, the battery of genes/molecules identified can be applied to study the sociomicrobiome in other ecosystems.



Sequencing was conducted using materials and equipment supplied from NSF equipment grant 0959864 and the UPR CREST CATEC program (NSF HRD 0734826). Our thanks to Sylvia Planas and Dania Rodriguez (Sequencing and Genotyping Facility, UPR - Rio Piedras) for conducting the 454 sequencing.

Authors’ Affiliations

Biology Department, University of Puerto Rico
California Polytechnic State University
Center for Applications in Biotechnology


  1. Bassler BL: How bacteria talk to each other: regulation of gene expression by quorum sensing. Curr Opin Microbiol 1999, 2(6):582-587. 10.1016/S1369-5274(99)00025-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Clarke KR, Gorley RN: PRIMER v6: User Manual/Tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E; 2006.Google Scholar
  3. DeAngelis KM, Allgaier M, Chavarria Y, Fortney JL, Hugenholtz P, Simmons B, Sublette K, Silver WL, Hazen TC: Characterization of trapped lignin-degrading microbes in tropical forest soil. PLoS One 2011, 6(4):e19306. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019306View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Decanis N, Tazi N, Correia A, Vilanova M, Rouabhia M: Farnesol, a fungal quorum-sensing molecule triggers Candida albicans morphological changes by downregulating the expression of different secreted aspartyl proteinase genes. Open Microbiol J 2011, 5: 119-126. 10.2174/1874285801105010119View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Engelberg-Kulka H, Hazan R, Amitai S: mazEF : a chromosomal toxin-antitoxin module that triggers programmed cell death in bacteria. J Cell Sci 2005, 118(Pt 19):4327-4332.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Engelberg-Kulka H, Amitai S, Kolodkin-Gal I, Hazan R: Bacterial programmed cell death and multicellular behavior in bacteria. PLoS Genet 2006, 2(10):e135. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020135View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fierer N, Jackson RB: The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 103: 626-631.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Fuhrman JA: Microbial community structure and its functional implications. Nature 2009, 459(7244):193-199. 10.1038/nature08058View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Gill SR, Pop M, Deboy RT, Eckburg PB, Turnbaugh PJ, Samuel BS, Gordon JI, Relman DA, Fraser-Liggett CM, Nelson KE: Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science 2006, 312(5778):1355-1359. 10.1126/science.1124234View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hazan R, Sat B, Reches M, Engelberg-Kulka H: Postsegregational killing mediated by the P1 phage “addiction module” phd-doc requires the Escherichia coli programmed cell death system mazEF . J Bacteriol 2001, 183(6):2046-2050. 10.1128/JB.183.6.2046-2050.2001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Koch B, Liljefors T, Persson T, Nielsen J, Kjelleberg S, Givskov M: The LuxR receptor: the sites of interaction with quorum-sensing signals and inhibitors. Microbiology 2005, 151(Pt 11):3589-3602.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Krishnan HB, Lorio J, Kim WS, Jiang G, Kim KY, DeBoer M, Pueppke SG: Extracellular proteins involved in soybean cultivar-specific nodulation are associated with pilus-like surface appendages and exported by a type III protein secretion system in Sinorhizobium fredii USDA257. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2003, 16(7):617-625. 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.7.617View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lindum PW, Anthoni U, Christophersen C, Eberl L, Molin S, Givskov M: N-Acyl-L-homoserine lactone autoinducers control production of an extracellular lipopeptide biosurfactant required for swarming motility of Serratia liquefaciens MG1. J Bacteriol 1998, 180(23):6384-6388.Google Scholar
  14. Long C, Lu XL, Gao Y, Jiao BH, Liu XY: Description of a Sulfitobacter strain and its extracellular cyclodipeptides. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011, 2011: 393752.Google Scholar
  15. Luo Y, Xu X, Ding Z, Liu Z, Zhang B, Yan Z, Sun J, Hu S, Hu X: Complete genome of Phenylobacterium zucineum : a novel facultative intracellular bacterium isolated from human erythroleukemia cell line K562. BMC Genomics 2008, 9: 386. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-386View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Magnuson RD: Hypothetical functions of toxin-antitoxin systems. J Bacteriol 2007, 189(17):6089-6092. 10.1128/JB.00958-07View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Miyatake F, Iwabuchi K: Effect of compost temperature on oxygen uptake rate, specific growth rate and enzymatic activity of microorganisms in dairy cattle manure. Bioresour Technol 2006, 97(7):961-965. 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.04.035View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Nies DH: Resistance to cadmium, cobalt, zinc, and nickel in microbes. Plasmid 1992, 27(1):17-28. 10.1016/0147-619X(92)90003-SView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Parsek MR, Greenberg EP: Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms. Trends Microbiol 2005, 13(1):27-33. 10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Pierson LS 3rd, Pierson EA: Metabolism and function of phenazines in bacteria: impacts on the behavior of bacteria in the environment and biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 86(6):1659-1670. 10.1007/s00253-010-2509-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Poole PS, Armitage JP: Role of metabolism in the chemotactic response of Rhodobacter sphaeroides to ammonia. J Bacteriol 1989, 171(5):2900-2902.Google Scholar
  22. Romero D, Traxler MF, Lopez D, Kolter R: Antibiotics as signal molecules. Chem Rev 2011, 111(9):5492-5505. 10.1021/cr2000509View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Sio CF, Otten LG, Cool RH, Diggle SP, Braun PG, Bos R, Daykin M, Camara M, Williams P, Quax WJ: Quorum quenching by an N-acyl-homoserine lactone acylase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Infect Immun 2006, 74(3):1673-1682. 10.1128/IAI.74.3.1673-1682.2006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Swiderska A, Berndtson AK, Cha MR, Li L, Beaudoin GM 3rd, Zhu J, Fuqua C: Inhibition of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens TraR quorum-sensing regulator. Interactions with the TraM anti-activator. J Biol Chem 2001, 276(52):49449-49458. 10.1074/jbc.M107881200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Thompson J, Brokaw N, Zimmerman JK, Waide RB, Everham EM, Lodge DJ, Taylor CM, García-Montiel D, Fluet M: Land use history, environment, and tree composition in a tropical forest. Ecological applications 2002, 12: 1344-1363. 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1344:LUHEAT]2.0.CO;2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Westwater C, Balish E, Schofield DA: Candida albicans -conditioned medium protects yeast cells from oxidative stress: a possible link between quorum sensing and oxidative stress resistance. Eukaryot Cell 2005, 4(10):1654-1661. 10.1128/EC.4.10.1654-1661.2005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Winzer K, Hardie KR, Williams P: LuxS and autoinducer-2: their contribution to quorum sensing and metabolism in bacteria. Adv Appl Microbiol 2003, 53: 291-396.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhu J, Beaber JW, More MI, Fuqua C, Eberhard A, Winans SC: Analogs of the autoinducer 3-oxooctanoyl-homoserine lactone strongly inhibit activity of the TraR protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens . J Bacteriol 1998, 180(20):5398-5405.Google Scholar
  29. Zhu J, Krom BP, Sanglard D, Intapa C, Dawson CC, Peters BM, Shirtliff ME, Jabra-Rizk MA: Farnesol-induced apoptosis in Candida albicans is mediated by Cdr1-p extrusion and depletion of intracellular glutathione. PLoS One 2011, 6(12):e28830. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028830View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Santiago-Rodriguez et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.