Open Access

Characterization of leptospira isolates from animals and humans: phylogenetic analysis identifies the prevalence of intermediate species in India

  • Vinayagamurthy Balamurugan1Email author,
  • Nidaghatta L Gangadhar1,
  • Nagalingam Mohandoss1,
  • Sushma Rahim Assadi Thirumalesh1,
  • Moushumi Dhar1,
  • Rajeswari Shome1,
  • Paramanandham Krishnamoorthy1,
  • Krishnamsetty Prabhudas1 and
  • Habibur Rahman1
SpringerPlus20132:362

DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-362

Received: 15 May 2013

Accepted: 29 July 2013

Published: 30 July 2013

Abstract

In this study, 191 culture isolates were recovered from suspected samples of animals and humans in Ellinghausen McCullough Johnson and Harris (EMJH) medium and assessed for its morphological features by dark field microscopy. Extracted DNA from individual culture was subjected to different PCR assays for identification and characterization of leptospira. Out of 99 positive leptospira cultures, 52 pathogenic leptospira isolates were characterized at species level by using partial RNA polymerase β-subunit (rpoB) gene sequences. Phylogenetic analysis of the nucleotide sequences revealed that 30, 8, and 14 isolates belong to L. borgpetersenii / L. interrogans, L. kirschneri, and Leptospira intermediate species, respectively. Based on analysis of 99 leptospira isolates, the prevalent Leptospira species were L. borgpetersenii or L. interrogans (30.30%), L. kirschneri (8%) and Leptospira intermediate species (14.14%) in animals and humans. To the best of authors knowledge, this is the first study to use rpoB gene nucleotide sequence based phylogenetic analysis to identify/detect Leptospira intermediate species (L. wolffii) in animals and humans in India. Hence, the prevalence of this species will surely emphasize the importance of consideration of Leptospira intermediate species and formulate a way for further studies especially in understanding the newly emerging Leptospira in animals and humans and to combat the problem associated with the disease conditions.

Keywords

Leptospira Animals Human Characterization Prevalence Intermediate species

Introduction

Leptospirosis is an important re-emerging zoonotic disease in tropical and subtropical regions of the world with various animal species acting as carriers. It is considered as an emerging global public health problem (Bharti et al. 2003), caused by different pathogenic species of leptospira and is difficult to control and eradicate in tropical developing countries like India. Hence, early detection of leptospira in the host, prompt treatment as well as creating awareness in the public are the steps that could be taken to reduce the extent of problem and the economical losses associated with it.

Diagnosis of leptospirosis is usually achieved by serological investigation particularly by microscopic agglutination test (MAT), a gold standard test. The MAT is a well proven, accepted and widely used serological test for the detection of leptospiral antibodies in animals and humans. It is very useful in the demonstration of a four-fold change in antibody titers in paired acute and convalescent sera and is of significant value in diagnosing recent infection. However, in case of animals, getting paired sera is difficult, in such case while testing of single serum in MAT, it is essential to correlate the results with clinical signs of the affected animal. Generally, very high MAT titres with a consistent clinical features are conclusive of leptospirosis.

In any particular geographical region, various leptospiral serovars are prevalent and are associated with one or more maintenance host(s) that serves as reservoir of infection. Leptospira spp. are traditionally classified into 29 serogroups and over 300 serovars (Levett 2001). Further, genotypic methods like DNA-DNA hybridization have identified 20 Leptospira spp. to date (Cerqueira and Picardeau 2009). However, antigenically related serovars are classified in two or more different species and a serogroup is often found in several species of leptospira. Serovar identification of isolates are essential to understand the prevalence of leptospira in the epidemiology of this disease, but few laboratories perform Cross Agglutination Absorption Test (CAAT) (Terpstra et al. 1985) and most isolates are therefore not identified at serovar level. Serogroups identified using the MAT have no official taxonomic status, can serve as practical purpose of grouping common antigens together. With the emergence of molecular typing methods, it has become increasingly clearer that the concept of a “serovar” is no longer fully satisfactory as it may fail to define epidemiologically important strains/isolates in an adequate manner (Cerqueira and Picardeau 2009). For example, molecular typing has been shown to give better discrimination of strains of the Grippotyphosa serogroup than serological typing (Steinen et al. 1992; Hartskeerl et al. 2004).

Phylogenetic analysis identifies three major groups of leptospira with few exceptions, based on the pathogenicity such as pathogenic, saprophytic and intermediate strains of unclear pathogenicity (Paster et al. 1991; (Matthias et al. 2008). Genes used to discriminate between species within the genus Leptospira include RNA polymerase β-subunit (rpoB) (La Scola et al. 2006), DNA gyrase subunit B (gyrB) (Slack et al. 2006) and leptospiral immunoglobulin-like protein (ligB) (Cerqueira et al. 2009). All the proposed taxonomic markers generate results consistent with those obtained with the 16S rRNA sequences in terms of clustering of the strains into three major groups.

The research activities in leptospirosis since inception of Project Directorate on Animal Disease Monitoring and Surveillance (PD_ADMAS) has led to isolation of Leptospira spp. from diverse animals and humans and their maintenance in the repository, development of a simple leptospira staining kit and recording of the leptospiral abortions in bovines and other animal species (Gangadhar and Rajashekar 1998; Gangadhar et al. 2006; 2008). It is imperative to know the circulating Leptospira species/serovars in animals and humans in different geographical locations in order to investigate the prevalence of Leptospira species during monitoring of the leptospirosis. This helps in appropriate use of panel of leptospira serovars in the MAT for providing proper diagnostic without false negative results. Hence, the preliminary study was undertaken to investigate the prevalence of Leptospira species in animals and humans using the archived cultural isolates recovered from suspected samples of animals and humans in different geographical locality of India collected during different periods up to the species level by using rpoB gene- based sequence and phylogenetic analysis.

Materials and methods

Culture media

A modified Ellinghausen McCullough Johnson and Harris (EMJH) liquid medium containing bovine serum albumin fraction V (Ellis 1986) was prepared as per standard bacteriological procedure with 200 μg of 5-fluorouracil per mL of medium.

Clinical samples

Clinical samples such as blood, serum, urine and other materials such as kidney, tissues and fluids from aborted fetus collected from suspected animals and humans [most of cases-pyrexia of unknown origin (PUO)] from different geographical locations of India collected either by the ADMAS team or obtained through various organizations such as state animal husbandry laboratories, research institutes and from organized farms which were submitted to the laboratory for leptospira diagnosis. The details of the species from which the samples were collected and the area of origin with brief history of samples and designation of cultural isolates are presented in Table 1. The majority of clinical materials were from the states of Karnataka, Maharashtra and Gujarat. The animals and human beings from which samples were collected and submitted for diagnosis had clinical signs consistent with leptospira infection especially in humans.
Table 1

Details of characterized leptospira isolates from animals and humans

ADMAS No.

Source of sample

Brief history of samples/specimens, place, year of collection

GenBank Acc. No.

  

Karnataka state

 

21

Kidney

Pregnant female rat trapped at military dairy farm, Bangalore, May,1994.#

JN388643

121

Kidney

Female rat trapped in dairy farm at Malleshwaram, Bangalore, August, 1994.#

JN388654

421

Blood/Serum

Repeat breeder cow from University of Agricultural Sciences dairy farm, Bangalore, July,1995.#

JN388636♣

737

Blood

Referred human case with fever from Bowring and Lady Curzon Hospital, Bangalore, February, 1997.*

HM046992

840

Urine

Rat from small animal house at Institute of Animal Health and Veterinary Biological, Bangalore, October, 1997.#

JN388655

843

Kidney

"

JN388644

930

CSF

4 ½ years old girl with pyogenic mengitis, Bangalore, March,1998.*

JN388645♠

950

Blood

Referred human case aged 21years male with fever & myalgia from Victoria Hospital, Bangalore, April,1998.*

JN388646

966

Urine

Referred human case aged 28 years male with fever, jaundice and hematuria from Bangalore Medical college, June, 1998.*

JN388627♣

1003

Blood

Buffalo calf with pyrexia, Hassan, August, 1998,*

JN388656

1063

Serum

Referred human case aged 30 years male with heptorenal syndrome and leptospira serology positive from NIMHANS, Bangalore, October,1998.*

HM046989♠

1147

Serum

Referred human case aged 14 years male with icteric discolouration of eye with heptomegally from St. Marthas Hospital, Bangalore, July,1999.

JN388634♣

1178

Serum

Referred human case aged 6 years female with pyrexia for one week from, Bowring and Lady Curzon Hospital, Bangalore, October, 1999.*

HM046997♠

1175

Blood

Bullock with fever from State Breeding and Training Centre, Hassarghatta, October, 1999.*

JN388616

107

Kidney

Adult male rat trapped from SPCA(Animal Shelter), Kennel, Bangalore, February, 1995.#

JN388629

1190

Blood

Alcoholic male aged 40 years from Gowribidanur with fever for 8 days (Temperature 104°C), August, 2000.*

JN388628

58

Blood/ Serum

Female with pyrexia of unknown origin, February, 2010.*

JN388620

G202

Foetal peritoneal fluid

Aborted foetus from cow with fever, Kengeri, March, 2007.#

JN388621

G229

Foetal heart blood

Aborted foetus from cow with fever, Devanahalli, June, 2007.#

JN388622♣

1345

Blood

HF cross breed cow with pyrexia and diahhroea, Hosodi, Shimoga, September,2001.#

HM046993

1332

Urine

Urine from the bladder of rat tapped from Veterinary Hospital, Husudi area, Shimoga, September, 2001.#

JN388633♣

1590

Serum/Blood

Repeat breeder cow with pyrexia from Veterinary Hospital, Mysore Road Bangalore, March, 2004.*

HM046994

3233

Blood

Referred human case of adult male with weakness of the left side body for15 days without pyrexia from KIMS Hospital, Bangalore, March, 2007.*

JN388652♣

3647

Heart Blood

Rat trapped at Poultry farm, Veterinary College, Bangalore May 2009.*

JN388657

  

Gujarat state

 

2421

Serum

Cow with fever from Animal Disease Investigation, Ramveri, Surat, Gujarat, September, 2006.*

JN388631

2475

Serum

Following incidence of leptospirosis samples were collected from Deputy Director of Animal Husbandry, Ambavadi, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, October, 2006.*

- Cow, Gandhinagar

JN388635

2757

Serum

- Cow, Maninagar

JN388639♣

2882

Serum

- Cow, Amaraiwadi

JN388642

2480

Serum

- Cow, Raipur

JN388647

2636

Serum

- Dog, Ghatlodiya

JN388648

2667

Serum

- Dog, Khadiya

JN388649

2713

Serum

- Buffalo, NavaVadaj

JN388650

2779

Serum

- Cow, Maninagar

JN388651♣

3334

Serum

6 ½ years old HF cross breed cow with pyrexia from Veterinary dispensary, Badekhan Chakla. Kazimaidair, Gopipur, Surat, Gujarat,August, 2007.*

JN388640♣

3360

Blood

Following incidence of leptospirosis, cow samples were collected from Paldi village, Kakanj Tal Daskroi District, Ahemadabad, Gujarat,September, 2007.*

JN388637♣

3377

Blood

"

JN388653♣

  

Maharashtra state

 

1215

Serum

Following incidence of leptospirosis, samples were collected from Disease Investigation Section (DIS),WRDDL, Aundh, Pune.* ^Thane-August, 2000;±Pune-August, 2005.

- Goat^

HM046995♠

1194

Serum

- Dog^

JN388615♠

1856

Serum

-Cow±

JN388632

1756

Serum

-Buffalo±

JN388625♣

1761

Serum

-Buffalo±

JN388630♣

1762

Serum/Blood

-Buffalo±

JN388618♠

3395

Serum

Following incidence of leptospirosis, samples were collected from DIS, WRDDL, Pune, September 2007.*

- Goat, Rajapur

JN388638

3394

Serum

- Goat, Rajapur

JN388624

3398

Serum

- Goat, Rajapur

JN388626

3397

Serum

- Goat, Pune

JN388641♣

Other states

1183

Blood

Male elephant aged 70 years having fever from Department of Medicine, Veterinary college, Mannuthy Kerala, June, 2000.*

HM046990♠

1228

Serum

4 years old cow having pyrexia from District Medical office, Leptospira cell, Thodupuzha, Idukki. Kerala, June, 2001.*

JN388619

1256

Serum

Dog with fever and Jaundice, Guwahati, Assam, July, 2001.*

HM046991

G70

Blood/Serum

3 years old repeat breeding cow, Goa, January 2006.#

JN388617

G73

Serum

6 years old pregnant cow with pyrexia, Goa, January, 2006.#

HM046996♠

G90

Serum/Blood

Repeat breeding cow, Goa, September, 2006.#

JN388623

*Suspected samples received for leptospirosis diagnosis. # Randomly collected samples for leptsospira study. Leptospira species identified L.interrogans or L.borgpetersenii species, ♠ L.krischneri species, ♣ Leptospira intermediate species group.

Isolation

For isolation of leptospira, the serum/blood/urine samples that were collected from the suspected animal were inoculated (1–2 drops) directly to the transport EMJH medium containing 500 μg of 5-fluorouracil per mL in the field level laboratory or veterinary dispensary or on the site of collection and transported to the laboratory at room temperature. Samples received from the messenger or by post either in the transport medium for isolation or submission of serum/blood samples on ice pack for diagnosis of leptospirosis, upon receipt all the samples were stored at 4°C and were further used when required. It was directly inoculated into EMJH medium for isolation. The collected urine, tissue/kidney and fetal fluid/tissues were transported to laboratory either on ice pack or on transport medium, upon receipt the particular pieces of tissues especially kidney were rinsed thoroughly in media and teased the cortex and medulla region with sterile needle using media and suspension was prepared by mincing the specimen in pestle and mortar in biosafety cabinet and inoculated into culture medium containing 5-fluorouracil for isolation of leptospira organism and to prevent contamination of other bacteria. After incubation at 30°C in the laboratory for 4–5 days, the culture were filtered through 0.2 μm membrane filter and subcultured periodically from 8 to 10 weeks. On successful isolation the cultures were stored in the semisolid EMJH medium for long-term storage as archived culture with periodical subculturing every 2 to 3 months for the viability of the organism.

In this study, 191 archived culture isolates from the samples that were collected from various hosts (Human-31; Cattle-82; Buffalo-11; Goat-11; Horse-8; Rat-25; Elephant-1; Dog-16 and water bodies-6), from different geographical locations of the country were taken for analysis to identify the isolated organisms initially as leptospira and further to characterize the pathogenic culture up to species level. These stored archived individual culture were revived again in liquid medium, for isolation of DNA for its molecular characterization along with the leptospira reference culture in liquid medium as the agarose present in the semi solid media will interfere in the pelleting of the leptospira organisms.

Identification of the causative agent by PCR

Genomic DNA was extracted from these cultures along with reference culture serovars using QIamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Germany) as per manufacturer’s procedure. Initially, Leptospira genus-specific PCR was carried out using reported Lept 1 and Lept 2 primers as per method described by Merien et al. (1992) to differentiate the leptospira from other spirochetes. Then, 16S rRNA gene-based PCR using E1 and E2 primers was performed which would amplify the 571 bp amplicon from pathogenic leptospira (Faber et al. 2000). Then, secY gene (translocase)-based PCR was also employed using the G1 and G2 primer set, which would amplify the 285 bp product from pathogenic Leptospira spp. (Gravekamp et al. 1993). Further, pathogenic isolates were characterized by rpoB gene-specific PCR, which was carried out using reported rpoB Lept 1,900f and 2,500r primers to amplify the partial gene sequences (≈600 bp product) for species identification (La Scola et al. 2006).

Cloning, sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

The rpoB PCR amplicons were purified using QIA quick gel extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germany) as per manufacturer’s protocol and cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, USA) following standard molecular procedures using Top10F’ E. coli host. The recombinant plasmid DNA was isolated and confirmed by PCR and restriction endonuclease analysis. The sequencing of plasmid was carried out commercially in an automated DNA sequencer. Nucleotide (nt) sequence analysis was performed with published rpoB gene sequences of other Leptospira spp. by using NCBI BLAST (Altschul et al. 1997). Further, comparative analysis of nt sequences were carried out by using the clustal W program alignment in MEGALIGN of Lasergene 6.0 (DNASTAR Inc., USA) package and sequence identity among all intermediate species was determined.

Phylogenetic tree was constructed based on partial nucleotide sequences of rpoB gene by using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) version 4 (Tamura et al. 2007). The alignment gaps were excluded from pair wise distance estimations. The tree topologies were evaluated by using bootstrap test of phylogeny in the neighbor-joining method and the bootstrap P-values were obtained after 1000 replicates of the dataset. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 1000 replicates was taken to represent the evolutionary history of the isolates analyzed. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% bootstrap replicates were collapsed. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated isolates clustered together in the bootstrap test were shown next to the branches. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) method and were in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. For comparison, available rpoB gene sequences of Leptospira spp. were retrieved from GenBank, NCBI database for identifying the species of isolates, which clustered in to respective genenomospecies of the Leptospira genus.

Results and discussion

Several molecular techniques have been evaluated for the identification and characterization of Leptospira spp. and DNA–DNA hybridization identified 20 Leptospira species to date with nine pathogenic Leptospira species (Cerqueira and Picardeau 2009). This species assignment is consistent with the results of the phylogenetic analysis based on the rrs (16S) gene, which codes for the 16S rRNA (Postic et al. 2000). La Scola et al. (2003) reported that analysis of a segment of rpoB may be useful as an initial screening test for the identification of a new isolate of leptospira using a system of similarity cut-off to define species. This technique may be useful for the detection as well as identification of leptospira in clinical or environmental samples but not for serovar determination in L. interrogans species (La Scola et al. 2006).

In this study, out of 191 revived cultures, 99 were found positive in leptospira genus-specific PCR. The remaining 92 cultures may be other spirochete organisms namely Borrelia, Treponema, Leptonema, etc., as these organism looks like a spiral under dark field microscopy examination and staining (Gangadhar and Rajashekar 1998; Gangadhar et al., 2005). Of these 99 positive leptospira cultures, 52 isolates were identified as pathogenic, when tested by different type of PCR assays as described in materials and methods. These 52 isolates were further characterized by rpoB gene-based nucleotide sequences and phylogenetic analyses, which revealed the prevalence of four Leptospira spp. {L. borgpetersenii or L. interrogans (n = 30), L. kirschneri (n = 8) and Leptospira intermediate species group (n = 14)} from animals and humans in India. Leptospira genus-specific PCR amplified 331bp products from the leptospira organism and different PCR assays detected 52 pathogenic organism, which also gave expected size of the PCR products from pathogenic isolates as described earlier. The remaining 47 culture isolates might be non pathogenic leptospira, which may require further study to classify these isolates using complete 16S rRNA sequencing. Further, rpoB gene-specific amplicons were cloned into plasmid vector, characterized and sequenced. The characterized leptospira isolates were from different species (Human-10; Cattle-21; Buffalo-4; Goat-5; Rat-7; Elephant-1; Dog-4). The partial rpoB gene sequences of the leptospira isolates were obtained (Table 1) after editing the primer sequences and submitted to the GenBank database (HM046989 to HM046997; JN388615 to JN388667).

By sequence analysis, the isolates showed identity with published sequences of various leptospires. L. interrogans was the most prevalent species among the examined samples of human and animals. In general, isolates belonging to either L. interrogans/L. borgpetersenii species showed 99 to 100% identity with reported sequences. Similarly, isolates belonging to L. kirschneri species had 98–99% identity. However, isolates belonging to intermediate species showed only 77.9% to 78.3% and 78.1 to 78.5% identity with reported sequences of L. inadai and L. fainei species, respectively. La Scola et al. (2006) described the convention of identification in practice ie., if the partial rpoB similarity of a test isolate or strain is lower than 92%, it should be regarded as a new species. If such a value goes above 97%, then the isolate under scrutiny should be regarded as being representative of a known species. Surprisingly, 14 isolates belonging to intermediate species group showed identities from 99.1 to 99.6% with only one leptospira strain so far reported from Thailand {L. wolffii serovar Khorat strain Khorat-H2 sequence-NZ_AKWX02000023} (Slack et al., 2008). This molecular characterization indicates prevalence of the L. wolffii intermediate species in India. In India, earlier sporadic human case reports with L. inadai infection and circulation of L. inadai in reservoir hosts have been reported (Gangadhar et al., 2000; 2008).

Further, phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1) of 52 isolates based on rpoB gene nucleotide sequences revealed that 30 isolates belong to either L. interrogans or L. borgpetersenii species and eight belongs to L. kirschneri species. However, clustering of 14 leptospira isolates branched into a separate group under intermediate species (namely L. wolffii species). Surprisingly, when analyzing in MEGALIGN, these isolates branch into a separate group under L. wolffii species and showed two to three different branching pattern within this group namely 8 isolates in one branch, 4 isolates in another and 2 isolates (ADMAS No. 2779 and 3334) in other separate branches. This may clearly indicate some of the isolates, which belong to particular serovars among this species. This is to be confirmed by further analysis using the referral panel of antigen and antibodies procuring from world reference laboratory.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree showing clustering of Leptospira constructed based on the nucleotide sequence of partial rpoB gene by bootstrap test of phylogeny using neighbor-joining method in MEGA-4 program. The values of major clusters are indicated in the node or branch in tree, which represent the bootstrap confidence tested on using 1000 replicates of the data set. Bar represents the genetic distance i.e., number of substitutions per site.

Based on the present study, the major prevalent pathogenic species of Leptospira in animals and human were L. borgpetersenii / L. interrogans (30.3%), intermediate species (14.14%) and L. krischneri (8%) in India. Similarly, in the bovine population, the percentage prevalence of aforementioned species among pathogenic isolates was 56% (14/25), 36% (9/25) and 8% (2/25), respectively. In Karnataka, the prevalence rate of these species among pathogenic isolates was found to be 62.25% (15/24), 25% (6/24) and 12.5% (3/24), respectively (Table 2). The intermediate species requires further study to determine the exact serovars or new species, as recently more classification of new isolates was made for this intermediate species (Levett et al. 2006; Matthias et al. 2008). Similarly, L. wolffii, a potential pathogenic leptospira species detected in human, sheep and dog as intermediate species (Slack et al., 2008; Zakeri et. al., 2010a b). The presence of L. wolffii with 100% identity in clinical human samples and animals suspected with leptospira may provide evidence for circulation of L. wolffii and its role in transmission cycle within human and animal hosts in Iran (Zakeri et. al., 2010a). To establish the possible seroprevalence of this species in the population, the inclusion of intermediate species serovars representative of all the serogroups in the panel of leptospira cultural serovars besides regular serovars used in MAT for seroepidemiological studies in animals and humans as recommended earlier (Gangadhar et al. 2000).
Table 2

Characterized Leptospira species from animals and humans in different states of India

State

Species

L. borgpetersenii or L. interrogans species

Leptospira intermediate species

L. krischneri species

Total

Karnataka

Cattle

4

2

-

6

Buffalo

1

-

-

1

Human

4

3

3

10

Rodents

6

1

-

7

Gujarat

Cattle

4

5

-

9

Buffalo

1

-

-

1

Dog

2

-

-

2

Maharashtra

Cattle

1

-

-

1

Buffalo

-

2

1

3

Dog

-

-

1

1

Goat

3

1

1

5

Goa

Cattle

2

-

1

3

Kerala

Elephant

-

-

1

1

 

Cattle

1

-

-

1

Assam

Dog

1

-

-

1

 

Total

30

14

8

52

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use rpoB gene-based phylogenetic analysis to identify or detect Leptospira intermediate species in animals and humans in India. Isolation and characterization of leptospires from the samples collected from different hosts, clearly suggested a possible leptospiral infection / or carrier status. Isolation of leptospires from blood samples of cows with either history of abortions or reproductive disorders does not necessarily incriminate leptospira as the etiology of the disorder but only serve as a possible indicator to the existence of the infection. Role of leptospira infection in abortions and reproductive disorders is well established by earlier workers including our earlier studies (Ellis et al. 1976; Poonacha et al. 1993; Gangadhar et al. 2008). Infected cattle are known to be maintenance host resulting in illness leading to abortion, stillbirth, infertility and mastitis or clinically normal but harbour infection and act as a potential source of infection (Higgins et al. 1980).

Leptospira and its maintenance hosts appear to undergo adaptation to their environment, and the preference and pathogenicity of these hosts can change with time and geographic region. Transmission of the infection among maintenance hosts (which remains largely asymptomatic) is efficient and the incidence of infection in humans are relatively high as they are incidental hosts or accidental hosts (which develop clinical disease). Because of the wide spectrum of animal species that serve as reservoirs/maintenance hosts, leptospirosis is considered as the most widely spread zoonotic disease.

The significance of intermediate species in public health and animal reproduction is neither clearly understood nor documented much in literature. It is imperative to identify the species prevalence as well as to know the pathogenic nature and its virulence factors, drug resistance etc. In order to understand the newly emerging leptospira in animals and humans by employing various techniques and to combat the problem associated with the disease conditions. Further studies should be carried out on characterization, identification by pulse field gel electrophoresis and hybridization techniques and pathological studies using hamster model in order to identify the exact Leptospira species.

The disease is of public health importance and warrants bio-safety measures in handling the organism and/or disease. Prevalence of intermediate species identified, will surely emphasize the importance of consideration of this species in India for further studies especially to understand the newly emerging leptospira in animals and humans and to combat the problem associated with the disease conditions if any. Therefore, it is important to increase attention about this disease among physicians and to strengthen laboratory capacity for its diagnosis. However, systematic random screening of the samples from different animals and at-risk personnel is required to know the exact prevalence rate in particular geographical locality, which again depends on the various epidemiological factors influencing leptospirosis occurrence and its spread. This could be useful in the selection of panel of serovars to be used in the MAT at different geographical location to provide proper diagnosis in animals and humans, which in turn will lead to development of specific diagnostics and also to determine the exact prevalence of leptospirosis in different species. Further, a large systematic epidemiology survey would be needed to define the presence and the prevalence of this pathogenic intermediate species in endemic regions of India.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Authors wish to thank Deputy Director General (Animal Sciences) and Assistant Director General (Animal Health), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, India, for financial support and encouragement. The authors also thank the Directors of the state Animal Husbandry Departments and human hospitals for sending the samples to the PD_ADMAS for providing diagnosis of leptopsirosis. The authors also thank Dr. P.Vijayachari, Director, Regional Medical Research Centre (ICMR), Port Blair, for providing the leptospira reference cultures and also for his constant support and encouragement.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Project Directorate on Animal Disease Monitoring and Surveillance (PD_ADMAS)

References

  1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, AA S a, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25: 3389-3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bharti AR, Nally JE, Ricaldi JN, Matthias MA, Diaz MM, Lovett MA, Levett PN, Gilman RH, Willig MR, Gotuzzo E, Vinetz JM: Leptospirosis: a zoonotic disease of global importance. Lancet Infect Dis 2003, 3(12):757-771. 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00830-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cerqueira GM, Picardeau M: A century of Leptospira strain typing. Infect Genet Evol 2009, 9: 760-768. 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.06.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cerqueira GM, McBride AJA, Picardeau M, Ribeiro SG, Morel V, Reis MG, Ko AI, Dellagostin OA: Distribution of the Leptospiral immunoglobulinlike (Lig) genes in pathogenic Leptospira spp. and application of ligB to typing leptospiral isolates. J Med Microbiol 2009, 58: 1173-1181. 10.1099/jmm.0.009175-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellis WA: The present status of leptospirosis diagnosis and control. In The diagnosis of Leptospirosis in farm animals. Edited by: Ellis WA, Little WA. The Netherlands: Martinous Nijhoff publishers; 1986:13-31.Google Scholar
  6. Ellis WA, Obrien JJ, Neill S, Henna J, Bryson DG: The isolation of a Leptospira from an aborted fetus. Vet Rec 1976, 99: 458-459.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Faber NA, Crawford M, LeFebvre RB, Buyukmihci NC, Madigan JE, Willits NH: Detection of Leptospira spp. in the aqueous humor of horses with naturally acquired recurrent uveitis. J Clinic Microbiol 2000, 38(7):2731-2733.Google Scholar
  8. Gangadhar NL, Rajasekhar M, Smythe LD, Norris MA, Symonds ML, Dohnt MF: Reservoir hosts of Leptospira inadai in India. Rev Sci Tech OIE 2000, 19(3):793-799.Google Scholar
  9. Gangadhar NL, Rajashekar M: A modified silver impregnation staining for Leptospira . Indian Vet J 1998, 75: 349-351.Google Scholar
  10. Gangadhar NL, Prabhudas K, Bhushan S, Sulthana M, Barbuddhe SB, Rhaman H: Leptospira infection in animals and humans: a potential public health risk in India. Rev Sci Tech OIE 2008, 27(3):885-892.Google Scholar
  11. Gangadhar NL, Prabhudas K, Gajendragad MR, Shashibhushan J, Kakoli A: Leptospirosis: an enigma of Zoonosis for the developing world. Infect Dis J Pakistan 2006, 15(10):20-24.Google Scholar
  12. Gangadhar NL, Rajasekhar M, Prabhudas K: Isolation of Leptonema from rodents and cattle in India. Indian J Anim Science 2005, 75(5):508-510.Google Scholar
  13. Gravekamp C, Van de Kemp H, Franzen M, Carrington D, Schoone GJ, Van Eys GJ, Everard CO, Hartskeerl RA, Terpstra WJ: Detection of seven species of pathogenic leptospires by PCR using two sets of primers. J Gen Microbiol 1993, 139: 1691-1700. 10.1099/00221287-139-8-1691View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Hartskeerl RA, Goris MG, Brem S, Meyer P, Kopp H, Gerhards H, Wollanke B: Classification of leptospira from the eyes of horses suffering from recurrent uveitis. J Vet Med B 2004, 51: 110-115. 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2004.00740.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Higgins RJ, Harbourne JF, Little TWA, Stevens AE: Mastitis and abortion in dairy cattle associated with Leptospira of the serotype hardjo. Vet Rec 1980, 27: 307-310.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. La Scola B, Bui LT, Baranton G, Khamis A, Raoult D: Partial rpoB gene sequencing for identification of Leptospira species. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2006, 263(2):142-147. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00377.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. La Scola B, Zeaiter Z, Khamis A, Raoult D: Gene-sequence-based criteria for species definition in bacteriology: the Bartonella paradigm. Trends Microbiol 2003, 11(7):318-321. 10.1016/S0966-842X(03)00143-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Levett PN: Leptospirosis. Clinic Microbiol Rev 2001, 14: 296-326. 10.1128/CMR.14.2.296-326.2001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Levett PN, Morey RE, Galloway RL, Steigerwalt AG: Leptospira broomii sp. nov., isolated from humans with leptospirosis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006, 56(3):671-673. 10.1099/ijs.0.63783-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Matthias MA, Ricaldi JN, Cespedes M, Diaz MM, Galloway RL, Saito M, Steigerwalt AG, Patra KP, Ore CV, Gotuzzo E, Gilman RH, Levett PN, Vinetz JM: Human leptospirosis caused by a new, antigenically unique Leptospira associated with a Rattus species reservoir in the Peruvian Amazon. PLoS Negligible Tropical Dis 2008, 2(4):1-12.Google Scholar
  21. Merien F, Amouriauz P, Perolat P, Baranton G, Saint Girons I: Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Leptospira spp. in clinical samples. J Clinic Microbiol 1992, 30: 2219-2224.Google Scholar
  22. Paster BJ, Dewhirst FE, Weisburg WG, Tordoff LA, Fraser GJ, Hespell RB, Stanton TB, Zablen L, Mandelco L, Woese CR: Phylogenetic analysis of the spirochetes. J Bacteriol 1991, 173: 6101-6109.Google Scholar
  23. Poonacha KB, Donahue JM, Giles RC, Hong CB, Petrites-murphy MB, Smith BJ, Swerczek TW, Tramont RR, Tuttle PA: Leptospires in equine fetuses, stillborn foals and placentas. Vet Pathol 1993, 30(4):362-369. 10.1177/030098589303000405View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Postic D, Riquelme-Sertour N, Merien F, Perolat P, Baranton G: Interest of partial 16S rDNA gene sequences to resolve heterogeneities between Leptospira collections: application to L. meyeri . Res Microbiol 2000, 151(5):333-341. 10.1016/S0923-2508(00)00156-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Slack AT, Kalambaheti T, Symonds ML, Dohnt MF, Galloway RL, Steigerwalt AG, Chaicumpa W, Bunyaraksyotin G, Craig S, Harrower BJ, Smythe LD: Leptospira wolffii sp. nov., isolated from a human with suspected leptospirosis in Thailand. Int J System Evol Microbiol 2008, 58: 2305-2308. 10.1099/ijs.0.64947-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Slack AT, Symonds ML, Dohnt MF, Smythe LD: Identification of pathogenic Leptospira species by conventional or real-time PCR and sequencing of the DNA gyrase subunit B encoding gene. BMC Microbiol 2006, 6: 95. 10.1186/1471-2180-6-95View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Steinen ACM, Schuurman JL, Gravekamp C, Korver H, Terpstra WJ: Muskrats as carriers of pathogenic leptospires in The Netherlands. Anton Van Leeuwonhook 1992, 61: 43-50. 10.1007/BF00572121View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 2007, 24: 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Terpstra WJ, Korver H, Van Leeuwen J, Klatser PR, Kolk AHJ: The classification of Sejroe group serovars of Leptospira interrogans with monoclonal antibodies. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hygiene 1985, 259: 498-506.Google Scholar
  30. Zakeri S, Khorami N, Ganji ZF, Sepahian N, Malmasi AA, Gouya MM, Djadid ND: Leptospira wolffii, a potential new pathogenic Leptospira species detected in human, sheep and dog. Infect Genet Evol 2010, 10(2):273-277. 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.01.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Zakeri S, Sepahian N, Afsharpad M, Esfandiari B, Ziapour P, Djadid ND: Molecular epidemiology of leptospirosis in northern Iran by nested polymerase chain reaction/restriction fragment length polymorphism and sequencing methods. American J Trop Med Hyg 2010, 82(5):899-903. 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0721View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Balamurugan et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.