Table 3 Results for I20
From: Multilevel hybrid method for optimal buffer sizing and inspection stations positioning
m | MHH cost | GA cost | Running time (s) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESM | MHH/Best | MHH | RPCPU | GA | |||
1 | 8.3125 | 9.23149 | 15.3 | 34.3 | 177.6 | −91.39 | 457.0 |
2 | 6.2645 | 6.90041 | 105.7 | 77.4 | 440.5 | −76.01 | 983.0 |
3 | 5.9802 | 6.28064 | 421.7 | 422.0 | 1011.9 | −58.33 | 1524.4 |
4 | 6.0663 | 6.32419 | 1601.2 | 591.7 | 1191.7 | 25.58 | 1364.0 |
5 | 6.2772 | 6.51936 | 4743.3 | 571.2 | 879.4 | 81.46 | 1402.9 |
6 | 6.5230 | 6.76087 | 11,108.7 | 631.4 | 992.0 | 91.07 | 1649.9 |
7 | 6.7959 | 7.02709 | 20,613.0 | 635.2 | 1108.9 | 94.62 | 1710.7 |
8 | 7.0965 | 7.37334 | 29,790.2 | 960.7 | 1560.7 | 94.76 | 1255.8 |
9 | 7.4298 | 7.67294 | 35,764.9 | 476.5 | 1076.5 | 96.99 | 1176.9 |
10 | 7.7947 | 8.05445 | 35,767.6 | 109.0 | 709.0 | 98.02 | 977.7 |