Skip to main content

Table 9 Classification of selected studies, publication year and detailed quality assessment score

From: Software project management tools in global software development: a systematic mapping study

Article

Type

Approach

Quality assessment

QA1

QA2

QA3

QA4

Score

Sinha et al. (2006)

Solution proposal

Experiment

Yes

Yes

Yes

Q1

5.0

Ramasubbu and Balan (2012)

Solution proposal

Case study

Yes

Yes

Yes

CORE A*

5.0

Treude and Storey (2012)

Evaluation research

Case study

Yes

Yes

Yes

Q1

5.0

Niinimaki et al. (2010)

Evaluation research

Case study

Yes

Yes

Yes

Q2

4.5

Gorton et al. (1997b)

Solution proposal

Experiment

Yes

Yes

Yes

CORE A

4.5

Palacio et al. (2011)

Solution proposal

Experiment

Yes

Yes

Yes

Q3

4.0

Lanubile et al. (2010)

Review

Other

Yes

Yes

No

Q1

4.0

Portillo-Rodríguez et al. (2012)

Review

Other

Yes

Yes

No

Q1

4.0

Persson et al. (2009)

Solution proposal

Experiment

Yes

Yes

Yes

Q3

4.0

Bowen and Maurer (2002)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

CORE A*

4.0

Al-Ani et al. (2014)

Evaluation research

Survey

Yes

No

Yes

Q1

4.0

Samoilenko and Nahar (2012a)

Evaluation research

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

CORE A

3.5

Samoilenko and Nahar (2012b)

Evaluation research

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

CORE A

3.5

Scharff et al. (2010)

Evaluation research

Experiment

Yes

Yes

Yes

CORE C

3.5

Costa et al. (2010)

Review

Other

Yes

Yes

No

CORE A

3.5

Spanjers et al. (2006)

Evaluation research

Case study

Yes

Yes

Yes

CORE C

3.5

Goedicke et al. (2000)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

CORE A

3.5

Herring and Rees (2001)

Evaluation research

Case study

Yes

Yes

Yes

CORE C

3.5

Sakthivel (2005)

Other

Other

Yes

Yes

No

Q2

3.5

Dullemond and van Gameren (2012)

Solution proposal

Case study

Yes

Yes

Yes

CORE C

3.5

Prause et al. (2010)

Evaluation research

Survey

Yes

Yes

Yes

CORE C

3.5

Dullemond et al. (2010)

Solution proposal

Experiment

Yes

Yes

Yes

CORE C

3.5

Mullick et al. (2006)

Evaluation research

Experiment

Yes

Yes

Yes

CORE C

3.5

Niinimaki and Lassenius (2008)

Evaluation research

Case study

Yes

Yes

Yes

CORE C

3.5

Tell and Ali Babar (2011a)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

CORE A

3.5

Liukkunen et al. (2010)

Evaluation research

Case study

Yes

Yes

Yes

CORE C

3.5

Jaanu et al. (2012)

Evaluation research

Survey

Yes

Yes

Yes

CORE C

3.5

Gupta and Fernandez (2011)

Solution proposal

Survey

Yes

Yes

Yes

CORE C

3.5

Geisser et al. (2007)

Solution proposal

Experiment

Yes

Yes

Yes

CORE C

3.5

Winkler et al. (2010)

Evaluation research

Experiment

Yes

No

Yes

CORE A

3.5

Dullemond and van Gameren (2013)

Solution proposal

Survey

Yes

Yes

Yes

CORE C

3.5

Miyamoto et al. (2012)

Solution proposal

Experiment

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

3.0

Thissen et al. (2007)

Evaluation research

Case study

Yes

No

Yes

CORE B

3.0

Gorton et al. (1997a)

Solution proposal

Experiment

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

3.0

Lam and Maheshwari (2001)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

CORE B

3.0

Surjaputra and Maheshwari (1999)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

CORE B

3.0

Simmons and Ma (2006)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

CORE B

3.0

Prikladnicki et al. (2012)

Review

Other

Yes

No

No

Q1

3.0

Giuffrida and Dittrich (2011)

Evaluation research

Case study

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

3.0

Beecham et al. (2012)

Solution proposal

Experiment

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

3.0

Lanubile et al. (2013)

Evaluation research

Theory

Yes

No

No

Q1

3.0

Portillo-Rodríguez et al. (2014)

Review

Other

Partially

Yes

No

Q1

3.0

Eskeli et al. (2011)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

CORE C

2.5

Wesslin et al. (2011)

Other

Other

Partially

Yes

No

CORE A

2.5

Portillo-Rodríguez et al. (2010)

Review

Other

Yes

Yes

No

CORE C

2.5

Monasor et al. (2010b)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

CORE C

2.5

Lamersdorf and Munch (2009)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

CORE C

2.5

Martignoni (2009)

Review

Other

Yes

Yes

No

CORE C

2.5

Sinha et al. (2007)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

CORE C

2.5

Cook et al. (2005)

Solution proposal

Experiment

Yes

No

Yes

CORE C

2.5

Giuffrida and Dittrich (2013)

Review

Other

Yes

No

No

Q2

2.5

Cataldo et al. (2009)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

CORE C

2.5

Mak and Kruchten (2006)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

CORE C

2.5

Simmons (2003)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

CORE C

2.5

Clear (2009)

Solution proposal

Experiment

Yes

No

Yes

CORE C

2.5

Vathsavayi et al. (2014)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

CORE C

2.5

Costa and Murta (2013)

Review

Other

Yes

Yes

No

CORE C

2.5

Chubov and Droujkov (2007)

Other

Other

Partially

No

Yes

CORE B

2.0

Monasor et al. (2010a)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

No

2.0

de Souza and Fonseca (2007)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

No

2.0

Garrido et al. (2012)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

No

2.0

Pesola et al. (2011)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

No

2.0

Aranda et al. (2011)

Solution proposal

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

No

2.0

Wu (2012)

Evaluation research

Theory

Yes

Yes

No

No

2.0

Jiménez et al. (2009)

Review

Other

Partially

No

No

Q2

1.5

Dullemond et al. (2009)

Other

Other

Yes

No

No

CORE C

1.5

Aranda et al. (2008)

Other

Other

Yes

No

No

CORE C

1.5

da Silva et al. (2010)

Review

Other

Yes

No

No

CORE C

1.5

Aranda et al. (2006)

Other

Other

Yes

No

No

CORE C

1.5

Murdoch and Astley (2004)

Evaluation research

Theory

Partially

No

No

CORE B

1.0

Salger et al. (2010)

Other

Other

Partially

No

No

CORE C

0.5

Paulish (2006)

Other

Other

Partially

No

No

CORE C

0.5

Ali et al. (2010)

Other

Other

Partially

No

No

CORE C

0.5

van Hillegersberg and Herrera (2007)

Other

Other

Partially

No

No

No

0.0

Wang et al. (2012)

Review

Other

Partially

No

No

No

0.0

Tell and Ali Babar (2011b)

Solution proposal

Theory

Partially

No

No

No

0.0