Skip to main content

Table 5 Results of BLR inpatient analysis (sick group, age 18+) (n = 2135)

From: Thailand’s universal coverage scheme and its impact on health-seeking behavior

Variables Non-designated facility care
OR 95% CI
Income (log transformed) 1.980 (1.587, 2.472)*
Age 1.017 (1.003, 1.032)*
Gender female (vs. male) 1.576 (1.072, 2.316)*
Education
 College or above 1.000  
 Primary school or below 0.240 (0.128, 0.450)*
 Middle or high school 0.382 (0.208, 0.700)*
Marital status
 Married 1.000  
 Single 2.125 (1.247, 3.623)*
 Divorced/widowed/separated 0.756 (0.439, 1.302)
Employment status yes (vs. no) 1.076 (0.737, 1.572)
Dual coverage yes (vs. no) 10.981 (7.199, 16.749)*
Chronic status yes (vs. no) 0.667 (0.443, 1.006)
Region rural (vs. urban) 0.853 (0.600, 1.211)
HosmerLemeshow goodness-of-fit test
Chi square (df) = 8.948 (8)
p value = 0.347
  1. Reference = designated facility care
  2. OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval
  3. * p value < 0.05