Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance comparison on four individual distortion types

From: Blind image quality assessment via probabilistic latent semantic analysis

SROCC

NIQE

ILNIQE

LQF

PROPOSED

LCC

NIQE

ILNIQE

LQF

PROPOSED

LIVE2 database

 JPEG2000

0.8851

0.8801

0.8265

0.8634

JPEG2000

0.9081

0.9025

0.8529

0.8848

 JPEG

0.8626

0.8627

0.7986

0.8758

JPEG

0.9086

0.9119

0.8583

0.9134

 WN

0.9673

0.9724

0.8421

0.9264

WN

0.9755

0.9788

0.8756

0.8807

 GBLUR

0.9531

0.8907

0.8699

0.8908

GBLUR

0.9646

0.9043

0.8379

0.9086

CSIQ database

 JPEG2000

0.8930

0.8140

0.8549

0.7958

JPEG2000

0.9121

0.8127

0.7686

0.7418

 JPEG

0.8990

0.9187

0.8432

0.8211

JPEG

0.9431

0.9396

0.8527

0.8545

 WN

0.8004

0.8567

0.8634

0.9030

WN

0.8031

0.8751

0.7903

0.8329

 GBLUR

0.8968

0.8202

0.7482

0.8369

GBLUR

0.9254

0.8514

0.7519

0.7687

TID2008 database

 JPEG2000

0.8970

0.8429

0.5854

0.8526

JPEG2000

0.9200

0.8711

0.6963

0.8736

 JPEG

0.8774

0.8812

0.7812

0.8112

JPEG

0.9381

0.9459

0.8708

0.8620

 WN

0.7186

0.9163

0.6510

0.4624

WN

0.7871

0.9183

0.7123

0.6122

 GBLUR

0.8737

0.8338

0.6602

0.8144

GBLUR

0.8996

0.8639

0.6847

0.8219