Table 4 Statistical analysis of treatments with mouthwashes for DNA double strand breaks
From: The myth of oral hygiene using synthetic mouthwash products
Serial no. | Treatments | Days | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st day | 2nd day | 3rd day | ||
1 | Control | 3.0 ± 0.5b,g | 4.0 ± 0.00b,f | 4.0 ± 0.00b,c,d,f,g |
2 | Prodent | 16.0 ± 0.577a,c–f | 10.0 ± 0.577a,f | 13.0 ± 0.577a,c,d–f |
3 | Bannet | 5.3 ± 0.666b,g | 7.0 ± 0.00f | 10.0 ± 0.577a,b,e,f,g |
4 | Clinica | 7.0 ± 0.577b,g | 8.6 ± 0.577f | 10.6 ± 0.577a,b,e–g |
5 | Enziclor | 7.0 ± 0.00b,g | 6.0 ± 0.577f | 5.0 ± 0.00b–d,f,g |
6 | Niflam | 6.0 ± 0.577b,g | 20.0 ± 0.00a–e,g | 7.0 ± 0.00a–e,g |
7 | Standard mutagen | 16.0 ± 1.73a,c–f | 11.0 ± 0.00a,f | 15.0 ± 0.00a–f |