Table 3 Absorbance against different treatments for determination of AP sites
From: The myth of oral hygiene using synthetic mouthwash products
Well number | OD of ARP + reduced DNA standard from Table 2 | Theoretically AP sites per 100,000 bp | Different treatments and their absorbance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 3.888 | 40 | −ve control 0.800 | Bannet 0.44 | Niflam 0.156 | Niflam 0.331 |
2 | 3.60 | 32 | Enziclor 0.718 | Bannet 0.293 | Niflam 0.525 | Clinica 0.672 |
3 | 3.20 | 24 | Enziclor 0.69 | Bannet 0.74 | Niflam 0.34 | Clinica 0.35 |
4 | 2.633 | 16 | Enziclor 0.74 | Prodent 0.231 | Niflam 0.65 | Clinica 0.591 |
5 | 2.633 | 8 | Enziclor 0.66 | Prodent 0.65 | – | Clinica 0.291 |
6 | 1.83 | 4 | Enziclor 0.73 | Prodent 0.39 | – | Clinica 0.314 |
7 | 0.912 | 2 | Bannet 0.384 | Prodent 0.47 | – | – |
8 | 0.152 | 0 | Bannet 0.41 | Prodent 0.56 | – | – |