Table 3 Absorbance against different treatments for determination of AP sites
From: The myth of oral hygiene using synthetic mouthwash products
| Well number | OD of ARP + reduced DNA standard from Table 2 | Theoretically AP sites per 100,000 bp | Different treatments and their absorbance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.888 | 40 |
−ve control 0.800 |
Bannet 0.44 |
Niflam 0.156 |
Niflam 0.331 |
| 2 | 3.60 | 32 |
Enziclor 0.718 |
Bannet 0.293 |
Niflam 0.525 |
Clinica 0.672 |
| 3 | 3.20 | 24 |
Enziclor 0.69 |
Bannet 0.74 |
Niflam 0.34 |
Clinica 0.35 |
| 4 | 2.633 | 16 |
Enziclor 0.74 |
Prodent 0.231 |
Niflam 0.65 |
Clinica 0.591 |
| 5 | 2.633 | 8 |
Enziclor 0.66 |
Prodent 0.65 | – |
Clinica 0.291 |
| 6 | 1.83 | 4 |
Enziclor 0.73 |
Prodent 0.39 | – |
Clinica 0.314 |
| 7 | 0.912 | 2 |
Bannet 0.384 |
Prodent 0.47 | – | – |
| 8 | 0.152 | 0 |
Bannet 0.41 |
Prodent 0.56 | – | – |