From: Dynamic bottleneck elimination in mattress manufacturing line using theory of constraints
Scenario | Resource capacity | Type A | Type B | Type C | Type D | Type E | Average* | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average | Half-width | Average | Half-width | Average | Half-width | Average | Half-width | Average | Half-width | |||
Present | r1 = 2, r2 = 2, r3 = 1, r4 = 1, r5 = 1, r6 = 2, r7 = 2, r8 = 2 | 165.90 | 0.49 | 323.06 | 0.81 | 165.50 | 0.42 | 165.40 | 0.42 | 165.36 | 0.55 | 197.04 |
S1 | r1 = 3, r2 = 2, r3 = 1, r4 = 1, r5 = 1, r6 = 2, r7 = 2, r8 = 2 | 185.43 | 0.57 | 325.30 | 0.69 | 166.76 | 0.25 | 167.16 | 0.45 | 191.36 | 0.33 | 207.20 |
S2 | r1 = 3, r2 = 3, r3 = 1, r4 = 1, r5 = 1, r6 = 2, r7 = 2, r8 = 2 | 186.46 | 0.59 | 325.80 | 0.70 | 166.76 | 0.25 | 167.16 | 0.45 | 192.30 | 0.34 | 207.70 |
S3 | r1 = 4, r2 = 3, r3 = 1, r4 = 1, r5 = 1, r6 = 2, r7 = 2, r8 = 2 | 187.46 | 0.54 | 325.80 | 0.70 | 166.76 | 0.25 | 167.16 | 0.45 | 193.60 | 0.41 | 208.16 |
S4 | r1 = 3, r2 = 2, r3 = 1, r4 = 1, r5 = 2, r6 = 2, r7 = 2, r8 = 2 | 237.16 | 0.80 | 358.66 | 1.00 | 166.76 | 0.25 | 167.16 | 0.45 | 197.50 | 0.72 | 225.45 |
S5 | r1 = 4, r2 = 3, r3 = 1, r4 = 1, r5 = 2, r6 = 3, r7 = 2, r8 = 2 | 331.93 | 0.76 | 490.00 | 1.00 | 166.83 | 0.28 | 167.23 | 0.44 | 297.16 | 0.91 | 290.63 |
S6 | r1 = 4, r2 = 3, r3 = 1, r4 = 2, r5 = 1, r6 = 2, r7 = 2, r8 = 2 | 187.46 | 0.54 | 325.80 | 0.70 | 191.10 | 0.20 | 191.40 | 0.32 | 193.60 | 0.41 | 217.87 |
S7 | r1 = 4, r2 = 3, r3 = 1, r4 = 2, r5 = 2, r6 = 2, r7 = 2, r8 = 2 | 242.40 | 0.96 | 360.46 | 1.00 | 197.90 | 0.55 | 198.03 | 0.65 | 200.10 | 0.76 | 239.78 |
S8 | r1 = 4, r2 = 3, r3 = 1, r4 = 2, r5 = 2, r6 = 3, r7 = 2, r8 = 2 | 331.93 | 0.76 | 490.00 | 1.00 | 296.76 | 0.73 | 296.76 | 0.90 | 297.16 | 0.91 | 342.52 |