Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Association between SLCO1B1 −521T>C and −388A>G polymorphisms and risk of statin-induced adverse drug reactions: A meta-analysis

Study (first author, year)

Country

Ethnicity

Study design

Definition of adverse drug reactions

Population disease

Source of participants

Voora et al. (2009)

USA

Caucasian 86 %; African American 5 %; other 9 %

Cohort

A composite adverse event (CAE) of premature discontinuation for any side effect or myalgia/muscle cramps (irrespective of CK values) or CK > 3×ULN (irrespective of symptoms)

Hypercholesterolemia

Hospital

Danik et al. (2013)

26 countries

Caucasian 100 %

Cohort

Clinical myalgia or the broader categories of muscle weakness, stiffness, or pain and clinically severe myopathy (frank myopathy and rhabdomyolysis)

No disease

Population

Donnelly et al. (2011)

UK (Scotland)

NA

Cohort

Intolerance defined as composite of abnormal CK measure 1–3 × ULN, with no abnormal recorded before statin commencement; or an abnormal ALT measure, with no abnormal before statin commencement (≥50 % increase in ALT from baseline also considered abnormal)and a relevant change in prescribing (switching statin to equivalent or lower dose, dose reduction of same statin, or discontinuation of statin prescribing)

Type 2 diabetes

Population

Link et al. (2008)

UK

Caucasian 100 %

Case–control

“Definite” myopathy: muscle symptoms, with CK > 10 × ULN; “incipient” myopathy: CK > 3×ULN and 5 × baseline level, plus AAT > 1.7 × the baseline value without an elevated AAT level alone at any other visit irrespective of muscle symptoms

Myocardial infarction

Population

de Keyser et al. (2014)

Netherlands

Caucasian 100 %

Cohort

The occurrence of either a dose decrease or a switch to another cholesterol-lowering drug or a too strong reduction in cholesterol level

NA

Population

de Keyser et al. (2014)

Netherlands

Caucasian 100 %

Cohort

The occurrence of either a dose decrease or a switch to another cholesterol-lowering drug or a too strong reduction in cholesterol level

NA

Population

de Keyser et al. (2014)

Netherlands

Caucasian 98 %

Cohort

The occurrence of either a dose decrease or a switch to another cholesterol-lowering drug or a too strong reduction in cholesterol level

Hypercholesterolemia and/or hypertension

Population

de Keyser et al. (2014)

Netherlands

Caucasian 98 %

Cohort

The occurrence of either a dose decrease or a switch to another cholesterol-lowering drug or a too strong reduction in cholesterol level

Hypercholesterolemia and/or hypertension

Population

Carr et al. (2013)

UK

Caucasians 100 %

Case–control

Myopathy: CK > 4×ULN; severe phenotype:denoted by CPK > 10 × ULN or rhabdomyolysis

Type2 diabetes, Alcohol dependence, Asthma, hypertention et al.

Population

Santos et al. (2012)

Brazil

Caucasian 87 %; Mulatto 10 %; African 3 %

Cohort

Myalgia defined as muscle pain irrespective of CK values or CK > 3×ULN irrespective of symptoms

Familial hypercholesterolemia

Hospital

Linde et al. (2010)

USA

NA

Cohort

Myalgias defined as muscular pain or weakness as reported by the patients, who graded their symptoms as mild, moderate or severe

Endocrine disorders

Hospital

Marciante et al. (2011)

Case:US, Canada; control:US

Caucasian for case, control 1 (CHS), control 2 (HVH): 90.8, 84.5, 89.4 %

Case–control

Definite rhabdomyolysis defined as muscle pain or weakness associated with CK > 10 × ULN

Dyslipidemia

Population

Brunham et al. (2012)

Netherlands

Caucasian100 %

Case–control

Plasma CK > 10 × ULN.

Dyslipidemia

Hospital

Study (first author, year)

Statin type

Dose/regimen [mean (SD)] (mg/d)

SNP

Case/(control or cohort size)

Case

Control

TT

TC

CC

TT

TC

CC

Voora et al. (2009)

Mixed

Multiple doses

rs4149056

97/351

62

31

4

263

84

4

 

Simvastatin

20.0 for 8 weeks + 80.0 for 8 weeks

 

34/124

17

17b

 

91

33b

 
 

Atorvastatin

10.0 for 8 weeks + 80.0 for 8 weeks

 

31/115

21

10b

 

88

27b

 
 

Pravastatin

10.0 for 8 weeks + 40.0 for 8 weeks

 

31/111

23

8b

 

83

28b

 

Danik et al. (2013)

Rosuvastatin

20.0

rs4149056

471/4404a

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Donnelly et al. (2011)

Mixed (simvastatin major)

Multiple doses

rs4149056

816/1275

565

227

24

905

348

22

   

rs2306283

816/1275

316

399

101

471

606

198

Link et al. (2008)

Simvastatin

80.0

rs4149056

85/90

29

35

21

70

17

3

de Keyser et al. (2014)

Simvastatin

Starting dose:20.0(11.4)

rs4149056

319/1462a

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

de Keyser et al. (2014)

Atorvastatin

Starting dose:17.8(13.2)

rs4149056

110/367a

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

de Keyser et al. (2014)

Simvastatin

Starting dose:41.7(18.9)

rs4149056

88/393a

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

de Keyser et al. (2014)

Atorvastatin

Starting dose:45.0(34.8)

rs4149056

42/244a

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Carr et al. (2013)

Mixed

Case:33.2 (15.7), contro:30.6(15.7)

rs4149056

76/372

40

30

6

260

101

11

 

Simvastatin

NA

 

59/222

29

25

5

147

71

4

 

Atorvastatin

NA

 

11/110

7

4

0

86

22

2

Santos et al. (2012)

Atorvastatin

Case:62.9(20.5) control:61.0(22.7)

rs4149056

14/129

12

2b

 

94

35b

 
   

rs2306283

14/129

10

4b

 

70

59b

 

Linde et al. (2010)

Mixed

Multiple doses

rs4149056

27/19

14

12

1

15

4

0

Marciante et al. (2011)

Cerivastatin

Case:0.6(0.2)

rs4149056

65/716

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

   

rs2306283

185/732

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Brunham et al. (2012)

Mixed

Case:31.0 (23.0) control:36.0 (25.0)

rs4149056

25/83

15

8

2

57

20

6

 

Simvastatin

NA

 

12/39

5

6

1

27

10

2

 

Atorvastatin

NA

 

10/34

7

2

1

24

7

3

Study (first author, year)

Effect estimate (95 % CI)

CC vs. TT

TC vs. TT

TC/CC vs. TT

CC vs. TT/TC

Additive

C vs. T

Adjusting factors

Voora et al. (2009)

4.24 (1.03–17.43)c

1.57 (0.95–2.57)c

1.70 (1.04–2.80)e

3.73 (0.92–15.20)c

1.70 (1.11–2.61)c

1.67 (1.10–2.52)c

Race, gender

 

NA

NA

2.76 (1.26–6.02)c

NA

NA

NA

 

NA

NA

1.55 (0.65–3.70)c

NA

NA

NA

 

NA

NA

1.03 (0.41–2.57)c

NA

NA

NA

Danik et al. (2013)

1.13 (0.65–1.97)d

0.90 (0.72–1.12)d

NA

NA

0.95 (0.79–1.15)d

NA

Donnelly et al. (2011)

1.75 (0.97–3.15)c

1.04 (0.86–1.27)c

1.09 (0.90–1.32)c

2.05 (1.02,4.09)e

1.12 (0.94–1.33)c

1.12 (0.94–1.32)c

Statin adherence, study duration, maximum dose, prescription for other lipid–regulating drugs, cyp3a4 inhibiting drugs, age, and rs2306283

 

0.76 (0.58–1.01)c

0.98 (0.81–1.19)c

0.93 (0.77–1.11)c

0.71 (0.52,0.96)e

0.90 (0.79–1.02)c

0.90 (0.79–1.02)c

Statin adherence, study duration, maximum dose, prescription for other lipid–regulating drugs, cyp3a4 inhibiting drugs, age, and rs4149056

Link et al. (2008)

16.90 (4.70–61.10)

4.97 (2.41–10.24)c

6.76 (3.46–13.20)c

9.52 (2.72–33.28)c

4.50 (2.60–7.70)

5.65 (3.32–9.62)c

de Keyser et al. (2014)

1.74 (1.05–2.88)d,e

0.77 (0.58–1.02)d,e

NA

NA

NA

NA

Age, sex, and starting dose

de Keyser et al. (2014)

1.49 (0.54–4.10)d,e

1.17 (0.77–1.79)d,e

NA

NA

NA

NA

Age, sex, and starting dose

de Keyser et al. (2014)

1.38 (0.34–5.71)d,e

0.74 (0.45–1.24)d,e

NA

NA

NA

NA

Age, sex, and starting dose

de Keyser et al. (2014)

NA

NA

0.97 (0.68–1.40)d,e

NA

NA

NA

Age, sex, and starting dose

Carr et al. (2013)

4.32 (1.82–10.43)e

1.93 (1.14–3.27)c

2.09 (1.27–3.45)c

2.81 (1.01–7.86)c

2.08 (1.35–3.23)e

1.93 (1.29–2.89)c

Statin type,previous history of type 2 diabetes, asthma,hypertension

 

6.33 (1.60–25.02)c

1.78 (0.97–3.27)c

2.03 (1.13–3.63)c

5.05 (1.31–19.43)c

2.13 (1.29–3.54)e

1.95 (1.23–3.10)c

 
 

2.31 (0.10–52.59)c

2.23 (0.60–8.32)c

2.05 (0.55–7.58)c

1.89 (0.09–41.74)c

1.91 (0.56–6.54)e

1.66 (0.52–5.28)c

 

Santos et al. (2012)

NA

NA

2.24 (0.47–10.72)e

NA

NA

NA

NA

 

NA

NA

2.08 (0.62–7.00)e

NA

NA

NA

NA

Linde et al. (2010)

3.21 (0.12–85.20)c

3.21 (0.84–12.35)c

3.48 (0.92–13.25)c

2.21 (0.09–57.14)c

3.44 (0.95–12.53)c

2.98 (0.90–9.89)c

Marciante et al. (2011)

NA

NA

NA

NA

2.45 (1.61–3.75)e

NA

Age at statin use, sex, and race

 

NA

NA

NA

NA

0.96 (0.75,1.24)e

NA

 

Brunham et al. (2012)

1.27 (0.23–6.92)c

1.52 (0.56–4.12)c

1.50 (0.58–3.69)

1.12 (0.21–5.91)c

1.26 (0.63–2.51)c

1.32 (0.62–2.81)c

 

2.70 (0.20–35.75)c

3.24 (0.81–13.02)c

4.50 (0.73–27.59)

1.68 (0.14–20.35)c

2.19 (0.79–6.12)c

2.29 (0.82–6.38)c

 

1.14 (0.10–12.79)c

0.98 (0.17–5.83)c

1.06 (0.22–4.80)

1.15 (0.11,12.43)c

1.04 (0.36–3.07)c

1.06 (0.30–3.70)c

Study (first author, year)

Statin type

Genotyping methods

Deviation from HWE

Voora et al. (2009)

Mixed

NA

No

Simvastatin

NA

Atorvastatin

NA

Pravastatin

NA

Danik et al. (2013)

Rosuvastatin

NA

NA

Donnelly et al. (2011)

Mixed (simvastatin major)

TAQMAN assays

No

No

Link et al. (2008)

Simvastatin

PCR-fluorescence

No

de Keyser et al. (2014)

Simvastatin

Microarray genotyping procedures

NA

de Keyser et al. (2014)

Atorvastatin

Microarray genotyping procedures

NA

de Keyser et al. (2014)

Simvastatin

TaqMan allelic discrimination

NA

de Keyser et al. (2014)

Atorvastatin

TaqMan allelic discrimination

NA

Carr et al. (2013)

Mixed

TaqMan real-time PCR SNP genotyping assays

No

Simvastatin

No

Atorvastatin

No

Santos et al. (2012)

Atorvastatin

PCR-HRM

No

No

Linde et al. (2010)

Mixed

PCR and DNA sequencing

No

Marciante et al. (2011)

Cerivastatin

Illumina Goldengate custom panel; Taqman 5′ nuclease discrimination assay; pyrosequencing on the PyroMark Q96MD platform.

NA

NA

Brunham et al. (2012)

Mixed

Illumina Goldengate genotyping assay

Yes

Simvastatin

No

Atorvastatin

No

  1. CI confidence interval, NA not available, HWE Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, PCR polymerase chain reaction
  2. aCase/size of cohort; b The frequencey of TC/CC; c The estimates were calculated using the original data; d Hazard ratio (HR); e The adjusted effect estimates