Fig. 4From: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of left ventricular peak filling rate using steady-state free precession and phase contrast sequencesBland–Altman plots for PFRs estimated by various methods. The temporal PC method (a) and spatial PC method (b) were compared with the SSFP method. The difference between two methods was plotted against their average. The solid line represents the mean of the differences, and the broken lines represent the mean ± 1.96 SD (95 % CI)Back to article page