Authors | Study design | JADAD score | Participants | Intervention | Outcomes measured | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schröder and Pässler (1994) | RCT | 1 | 44 Patients (all underwent ACL reconstruction surgery under arthroscopy) G1 (n = 21) 15 M/6 W Mean age 24.2 y G2 (n = 23) 18 M/5 W Mean age 24.8 y | G1: CCD (continuously up to hospital discharge) G2: Ice bags (three times/day) | 1. Pan intensity (VAS) 2. Edema (knee circumference measured using tape) 3. Range of motion-ROM (in degrees) 4. Knee function (knee score of Noyes and McGinniss) 5. Use of analgesic medication (total doses, mg/kg) of oral tilidine, IM pethidine and piritramide 6. Blood loss (in ml) 7. Adverse events Outcomes were measured on POD 1, 2, 3, 6, 14, 28 | G1 had significant differences in: ROM on all days (P < 0.01); VAS pain scale on the 6th day (P < 0.01); knee edema on the 3rd and 6th days (P < 0.035), knee function (P < 0.025) and used less oral tilidine and IM piritramide (P < 0.04) There were no adverse events |
Li et al. (2010a) | RCT | 3 | 140 Patients (all underwent arthroscopic surgery) G1 (n = 70) G2 (n = 70) Total mean age 36.6 y | G1: CCD (continuously up to POD2) G2: Conventional ice pack therapy (cycles (1 h treatment and 1 h pause) for 1 day) | 1. Pain intensity (VAS) 2. Use of analgesic medication (celecoxib) | G1 had significantly lower VAS pain scores and less use of pain medications on 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 h after operation (P < 0.05) There were no adverse events |
Li et al. (2010b) | RCT | 3 | 140 Patients (all underwent arthroscopic surgery) G1 (n = 70) G2 (n = 70) Total mean age 36.6 y | G1: CCD (continuously up to POD2) G2: Conventional ice pack therapy (cycles (1 h treatment and 1 h pause) for 1 day) | Edema (knee circumference measured using tape) | G1 had significantly lower VAS pain scores and less use of pain medications on 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h after operation (P < 0.05) There were no adverse events |
Demoulin et al. (2012) | RCT | 3 | 66 Patients (all underwent primary unilateral TKA surgery) G1 (n = 22) 8 M/14 W Mean age 72.0 y G2 (n = 22) 9 M/13 W Mean age 68.1 y G3 (n = 22) 9 M/13 W Mean age 71.2 y | G1: GCD (3 sessions (90 s)/day from POD2 to hospital discharge) G2: Traditional ‘‘gel pack’’ therapy (5 sessions (20 min)/day from POD2 to hospital discharge) G3: CCD (5 sessions (20 min)/day from POD2 to hospital discharge) | 1. Pain intensity (VAS) 2. Edema (knee circumference measured using tape) 3. Range of motion-ROM (in degrees) 4. Cutaneous temperature | Comparison including VAS, edema, cutaneous temperature and ROM between G2 and G3 on POD7 remained non-significant (P > 0.05). There were no adverse events |
Waterman et al. (2012) | RCT | 3 | 36 Patients (all underwent ACL reconstruction surgery) G1 (n = 18) 15 M/3 W Mean age 28.7 y G2 (n = 18) 15 M/3 W Mean age 30.9 y | G1: CCD (3 sessions (30 min)/day for 6 weeks) G2: Conventional ice pack therapy (3 sessions (30 min)/day for 6 weeks) | 1. Pain intensity (VAS) 2. Edema (knee circumference measured using tape) 3. Use of analgesic medication (not reported) 4. Knee function (Lysholm score) 5. Quality of life (SF-36) Outcomes were measured on POW 1, 2, and 6 | G1 had significantly lower VAS pain scores (P < 0.0001) and discontinued use of pain medications, by 6 weeks (P = 0.0008) There were no adverse events |
Tian et al. (2013) | RCT | 3 | 64 Patients (all underwent arthroscopy surgery) G1 (n = 32) 7 M/25 W Mean age 54.21 y G2 (n = 32) 12 M/20 W Mean age 56.44 y | G1: CCD (continuous treatment for 2 days after operation) G2: Conventional ice pack therapy (cycles (30 min treatment and 8 h pause) for 2 days after operation) | 1. Pain intensity (VAS) 2. Edema (knee circumference measured using tape) 3. Knee function (HSS score) 4. Comfort degree | G1 had significantly lower VAS pain scores and lighter edema on POD1 and 2 (P < 0.05) G1 had higher comfort degree than G2 (P < 0.05). There were no adverse events |
Xie et al. (2013) | RCT | 1 | 40 Patients (all underwent ACL reconstruction surgery under arthroscopy) G1 (n = 20) 16 M/4 W Mean age 29.1 y G2 (n = 20) 15 M/5 W Mean age 28.2 y | G1: CCD (continuous treatment for 3 days after operation) G2: Physiological saline ice pack therapy (4 sessions (45 min)/day for 3 days after operation) | 1. Pain intensity (VAS) 2. Edema (knee circumference measured using tape) | G1 had significantly lower VAS pain scores and lighter edema on POD1, 2 and 3 (P < 0.05) There were no adverse events |
Xu et al. (2013) | RCT | 3 | 60 Patients (all underwent TKA surgery) G1 (n = 30) 11 M/19 W Mean age 65.8 y G2 (n = 30) 10 M/20 W Mean age 67.1 y | G1: CCD (continuous treatment for 2 days after operation) G2: Hypertonic saline crushed ice bag (cycles (20 min treatment and 2 h pause) for 3 days after operation) | 1. Pain intensity (VAS) 2. Edema (knee circumference measured using tape) 3. Range of motion-ROM (in degrees) 4. Postoperative drainage 5. Cutaneous temperature | G1 had significantly lower VAS pain scores and lighter edema on POD1 and 2 (P < 0.05) G1 had better ROM on POD1, 2 and 3 (P < 0.05) Cutaneous temperature in G1 was higher than G2 (P < 0.05) There were no adverse events |
Xie et al. (2014) | RCT | 1 | 40 Patients (all underwent non-ACL reconstruction surgery under arthroscopy) G1 (n = 20) 16 M/4 W Mean age 36.8 y G2 (n = 20) 17 M/3 W Mean age 35.5 y | G1: CCD (continuous treatment for 2 days after operation) G2: Physiological saline ice pack therapy (4 sessions (45 min)/day for 2 days after operation) | 1. Pain intensity (VAS) 2. Edema (knee circumference measured using tape) 3. Range of motion-ROM (in degrees) | G1 had significantly lower VAS pain scores and lighter edema on POD1 and 2 (P < 0.05) G1 had higher ROM than G2 (P < 0.05). There were no adverse events |
Wang et al. (2014) | RCT | 3 | 32 Patients (20 patients underwent ACL reconstruction surgery and 12 patients underwent PCL reconstruction surgery under arthroscopy) G1 (n = 16) 4 M/12 W Mean age 50.72 y G2 (n = 16) 7 M/9 W Mean age 57.13 y | G1: CCD (continuous treatment for 2 days after operation) G2: Conventional ice pack therapy for 2 days after operation) | 1. Pain intensity (VAS) 2. Edema (knee circumference measured using tape) 3. Knee function (Lysholm score) 4. Comfort degree | G1 had significantly lower VAS pain scores and slighter edema on POD1 and 2 (P < 0.05) G1 had higher comfort degree than G2 (P < 0.05). There were no adverse events |