Gradation (mm) | Approaches used for comparison from the best fitting to the worst fitting | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 (best) | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 (worst) | |
4.75–2 | Slitcher | USBR | Terzaghi | A–S | Chapuis | Breyer | Hazen | K–C | NAVFAC |
2–1.18 | USBR | Slitcher | Chapuis | Terzaghi | A–S | Breyer | Hazen | K–C | NAVFAC |
1.18–0.6 | USBR | Slitcher | Chapuis | Terzaghi | A–S | Breyer | Hazen | K–C | NAVFAC |
0.6–0.425 | USBR | Slitcher | Chapuis | Terzaghi | A–S | Breyer | Hazen | K–C | NAVFAC |
0.425–0.3 | USBR | Slitcher | Chapuis | A–S | Terzaghi | Breyer | Hazen | K–C | NAVFAC |
4.75–0.075 | Slitcher | Terzaghi | USBR | A–S | Chapuis | Breyer | NAVFAC | Hazen | K–C |
2–0.075 | Slitcher | Terzaghi | USBR | Chapuis | A–S | Breyer | Hazen | NAVFAC | K–C |
1.18–0.075 | Terzaghi | Slitcher | Chapuis | A–S | Breyer | USBR | Hazen | NAVFAC | K–C |
0.6–0.075 | Terzaghi | Chapuis | USBR | Breyer | A–S | Slitcher | Hazen | K–C | NAVFAC |
0.425–0.075 | Breyer | Terzaghi | Chapuis | A–S | Slitcher | Hazen | USBR | K–C | NAVFAC |
0.3–0.075 | Breyer | Terzaghi | Hazen | Chapuis | A–S | Slitcher | USBR | K–C | NAVFAC |
4.75–0.6 | Slitcher | Terzaghi | A–S | USBR | Chapuis | Breyer | Hazen | K–C | NAVFAC |
2–0.6 | USBR | Slitcher | Terzaghi | Chapuis | A–S | Breyer | Hazen | K–C | NAVFAC |
4.75–0.425 | Slitcher | Terzaghi | A–S | Chapuis | Breyer | Hazen | USBR | K–C | NAVFAC |
2–0.425 | Slitcher | USBR | Terzaghi | Chapuis | A–S | Breyer | Hazen | K–C | NAVFAC |
1.18–0.425 | USBR | Slitcher | Terzaghi | Chapuis | A–S | Breyer | Hazen | K–C | NAVFAC |