Table 7 Comparison of different optimisation methods
Method | Cutting speed (m/min) | Feed rate (mm/rev) | Depth of cut (mm) | C U ($/piece) | Constraint violation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V r | V s | f r | f s | d r | d s | |||
COA (Mellal and Williams 2015) | 123.1462 | 169.9876 | 0.5655 | 0.2262 | 3 | 3 | 1.959 | – |
GA (Onwubolu and Kumalo 2001) | 114.22 | 164.369 | 0.7 | 0.2978 | 2.9745 | 2.9863 | 1.8450 | (38), (39), (40), (46), (47), (48) |
PSO (Srinivas et al. 2009) | 106.69 | 155.89 | 0.897 | 0.28 | 2 | 2 | 2.272 | 0 |
ACO (Vijayakumar et al. 2003) | 103.05 | 162.02 | 0.9 | 0.24 | – | – | 1.626 | (55): not considered |
HPSO (Costa et al. 2011) | 123.3424 | 169.9783 | 0.5655 | 0.2262 | 3 | 3 | 1.959 | – |
SA–PS (Chen and Tsai 1996) | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2.313 | – |
TLBO (Rao and Kalyankar 2013) | 110 | 170 | 0.565 | 0.225 | 3 | 3 | 1.973 | – |
HRDE (Yildiz 2013a) | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2.046 | – |
AIA (Yildiz 2013a) | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2.12 | – |
DERE (Yildiz 2012) | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2.046 | – |
ABC (Yildiz 2012) | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2.118 | – |
DE (Yildiz 2012) | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2.136 | – |
HABC (Yildiz 2013b) | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2.046 | – |
HRTLBO (Yildiz 2013c) | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2.046 | – |
GA–SQP (Belloufi et al. 2012) | 94.464 | 162.289 | 0.866 | 0.258 | 3 | 3 | 1.814 | (38), (39) |
FA (Belloufi et al. 2014) | 98.4102 | 162.2882 | 0.820 | 0.2582 | 3 | 3 | 1.824 | (39) |
TDPSO (Samuel and Rajan 2015) | 123.34317 | 123.34317 | 0.565528 | 0.565528 | 3 | 3 | 1.7361 | – |
HSFLA3 | 131.7577 | 138.4592 | 0.55407 | 0.5056 | 3 | 3 | 1.7157 | – |