Skip to main content

Table 14 The means and coefficients of the variations of the proportions of honest informed agents uninformed trusted with different honest to dishonest ratio

From: Cheap talk communication with dynamic information searching

  \(Neighbors=2\) (%) \(Neighbors=4\) (%) \(Neighbors=6\) (%) \(Neighbors=8\) (%) \(Neighbors=10\) (%)
\(Rh{:}Rd=3{:}7\)
 Mean 35.81 40.87 42.85 46.43 49.91
 C.V. 11.20 15.61 18.83 15.60 22.26
\(Rh{:}Rd=5{:}5\)
 Mean 70.75 84.06 92.81 94.64 96.97
 C.V. 4.38 3.63 2.58 2.38 1.71
\(Rh{:}Rd=7{:}3\)
 Mean 77.52 81.89 84.56 84.40 85.98
 C.V. 3.90 5.65 6.41 8.14 9.26
  \(\gamma =0.1\) (%) \(\gamma =0.3\) (%) \(\gamma =0.5\) (%) \(\gamma =0.7\) (%) \(\gamma =0.9\) (%)
\(Rh{:}Rd=3{:}7\)
 Mean 97.52 54.42 40.87 34.40 32.76
 C.V. 5.71 10.77 15.61 16.05 18.10
\(Rh{:}Rd=5{:}5\)
 Mean 100.00 99.91 84.06 66.79 57.81
 C.V. 0.00 0.10 3.63 6.44 8.30
\(Rh{:}Rd=7{:}3\)
 Mean 99.50 91.64 81.89 73.03 75.34
 C.V. 1.54 5.00 5.65 7.49 6.92
  \(relink=0\) (%) \(relink=10\) (%) \(relink=20\) (%) \(relink=30\) (%) \(relink=100\) (%)
\(Rh{:}Rd=3{:}7\)
Mean 35.15 50.41 42.78 41.74 39.62
C.V. 6.46 11.53 11.08 12.63 10.65
\(Rh{:}Rd=5{:}5\)
Mean 70.58 99.14 96.09 93.91 83.11
C.V. 2.68 0.39 0.96 1.45 2.79
\(Rh{:}Rd=7{:}3\)
Mean 76.75 88.76 83.03 84.52 80.30
C.V. 3.18 4.19 4.58 3.74 4.41
  1. 1. Investigating the effect of the number of neighbors on information identification under different honest to dishonest ratios, other parameters are set as base case, uninformed to informed ratio is 9:1, the parameter measuring their information accuracy is 0.5, and percentage of relink is 10
  2. 2. Investigating the effect of information accuracy on information identification under different honest to dishonest ratios, other parameters are set as base case, uninformed to informed ratio is 9:1, the number of neighbors is 4, and percentage of relink is 10
  3. 3. Investigating the effect of percentage of relink on information identification under different honest to dishonest ratios, other parameters are set as base case, uninformed to informed ratio is 9:1, the number of neighbors is 4 and the parameter measuring their information accuracy is 0.5