Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of NGT, IFG, and T2D subjects in Nantong, Wuxi, Yixing and Gulou populations

From: Evaluation of common variants in MG53 and the risk of type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance in Han Chinese

Characteristics

Nantong population

Wuxi population

Yixing population

Gulou

NGT (n = 957)

IFG (n = 522)

T2D (n = 776)

NGT (n = 1200)

T2D (n = 1200)

NGT (n = 2850)

IFG (n = 875)

T2D (n = 497)

Prediabetes (n = 1932)

Female (n %)

626 (65.41 %)

342 (65.52 %)

527 (67.91 %)

722 (60.17)

722 (60.17 %)

1685 (59.12 %)

535 (61.14 %)

287 (57.74 %)

1244 (64.39 %)

Age (years)

58.54 ± 9.47

58.05 ± 9.95

58.17 ± 8.56

56.43 ± 8.02

57.43 ± 9.77

60.33 ± 10.71

60.86 ± 10.88

61.75 ± 10.30*

58.64 ± 9.26

BMI (kg/m2)

21.31 ± 1.50

25.75 ± 3.85

25.54 ± 3.55**

22.64 ± 2.86

24.92 ± 3.41**

23.83 ± 3.31

24.82 ± 3.44

25.08 ± 3.47**

25.07 ± 3.32

Waist circumference (cm)

75.49 ± 6.33

88.22 ± 10.43

88.96 ± 10.35**

81.42 ± 9.48

85.41 ± 9.23

83.51 ± 9.09

86.37 ± 9.34

86.83 ± 9.36**

 

Systolic BP (mmHg)

113.79 ± 11.45

130.43 ± 19.14

132.72 ± 19.52**

118.17 ± 14.88

137.47 ± 21.20

132.02 ± 15.65

135.43 ± 15.60

135.39 ± 16.90**

132.61 ± 16.77

Diastolic BP (mmHg)

68.28 ± 7.90

77.46 ± 11.10

78.11 ± 10.86**

75.83 ± 8.64

80.12 ± 10.25

82.70 ± 8060

84.13 ± 8.53

83.64 ± 8.97**

78.94 ± 10.47

PAI

63.46 ± 19.99

60.43 ± 20.68

53.81 ± 20.91**

FPG (mmol/L)

4.18 ± 0.4618

6.08 ± 0.37

8.44 ± 3.31**

4.51 ± 0.46

8.97 ± 3.52

4.89 ± 0.59

6.04 ± 0.36

9.52 ± 3.24**

5.80 ± 0.51

FINS (mU/L)

5.74 ± 4.39

7.36 ± 6.08

9.65 ± 5.74**

12.51 ± 7.76

HOMA-β

81.70 ± 260.99

58.47 ± 46.90

41.91 ± 54.71**

113.36 ± 75.85

HOMA-IR

1.26 ± 0.99

1.98 ± 1.68

4.16 ± 4.49**

3.24 ± 2.07

HOMA-IS

0.07 ± 0.10

0.04 ± 0.04

0.02 ± 0.03**

0.02 ± 0.016

  1. n number of subjects, BMI body mass index, PAI physical activity index, FPG fasting plasma glucose, FINS fasting insulin, HOMA homeostasis model assessment, IR Insulin resistance, NGT normal glucose tolerance, IFG impaired fasting glucose, P probability, T2D type 2 diabetes
  2. * Significant differences in characteristics between NGT, IGT and T2D group (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.0001) were determined by two-tailed Student’s t test for quantitative data (mean ± standard deviation) and two-sided Chi squared test for categorical data (%). HOMA-β and HOMA-IR are log-transformed to follow normal distribution for comparison