Skip to main content

TableĀ 5 Antibiotic resistance profile and MAR index of enteropathogenic bacteria isolated (NĀ =Ā 93), at La Paz River basin water, soil and vegetable sampling points

From: Impact of urban contamination of the La Paz River basin on thermotolerant coliform density and occurrence of multiple antibiotic resistant enteric pathogens in river water, irrigated soil and fresh vegetables

Enteropathogenic bacteria

Strain codea

Resistance profile

MAR indexb

ETECc

W2-1(LT/STh)

ST

0.17

Ā 

W2-2 (LT/STh)

C, TC

Ā 
Ā 

W2-3 (LT/STh)

AM, S, ST

Ā 
Ā 

W2-4 (LT/STh)

AM, NA

Ā 
Ā 

W2-6 (LT/STh)

NA

Ā 
Ā 

W2-7 (STh)

CI, NA

Ā 
Ā 

W2-14 (LT/STh)

AM, AB, S

Ā 
Ā 

W2-22 (STh)

NA

Ā 
Ā 

W2-51 (LT/STh)

AM, AB, C, TC

Ā 
Ā 

W2-61 (LT/STh)

ā€“

Ā 

EAEC

W2-72

ST

0.18

Ā 

W2-75

AM, NA, S, ST, TC

Ā 
Ā 

W2-76

ā€“

Ā 

EPEC

W2-38

AM, AB, C, S, ST, TC

0.33

Ā 

W2-60

NA, ST, TC

Ā 
Ā 

W2-74

AM, ST

Ā 

Salmonella

W2-9

NA

0.22

Ā 

W2-16

NA

Ā 
Ā 

W2-26

AM, C, CN, S, ST, TC

Ā 
Ā 

W2-35

AM, C, CN, S, ST, TC

Ā 
Ā 

W2-41

NA

Ā 
Ā 

W2-52

NA

Ā 
Ā 

W2-57

ā€“

Ā 
Ā 

W2-90

AM, C, TC

Ā 

ETEC

W3-45 (LT/STh)

AM, AB, NA, S, ST

0.17

Ā 

W3-46 (LT/STh)

NA

Ā 
Ā 

W3-48 (LT/STh)

AM, C, TC

Ā 
Ā 

W3-73 (LT)

AM

Ā 
Ā 

W3-77 (LT/STh)

ā€“

Ā 
Ā 

W3-78 (LT/STh)

NA

Ā 
Ā 

W3-79 (LT)

AM, ST

Ā 

EAEC

W3-8

AM, S, TC

0.24

Ā 

W3-20

AM, CN, S, ST, TC

Ā 
Ā 

W3-34

NA

Ā 
Ā 

W3-47

AM, ST

Ā 
Ā 

W3-80

AM, NA

Ā 

EPEC

W3-23

AM, ST

0.18

Salmonella

W3-10

NA

0.23

Ā 

W3-17

AM, C, CT, NA, S, ST, TC

Ā 
Ā 

W3-27

AM, AB, C, CN, FX, NA, S, ST, TC

Ā 
Ā 

W3-42

NA

Ā 
Ā 

W3-53

ā€“

Ā 
Ā 

MV58

ā€“

Ā 
Ā 

W3-65

TC

Ā 
Ā 

W3-91

TC

Ā 

ETEC

W4-15 (LT)

AM, C, ST, TC

0.21

Ā 

W4-33 (LT)

ā€“

Ā 
Ā 

W4-49 (LT)

ā€“

Ā 
Ā 

W4-50 (LT)

AM, CI, CN, NA, S, ST, TC

Ā 
Ā 

W4-62 (LT)

AM, C, ST

Ā 
Ā 

W4-89 (LT/STh)

NA

Ā 
Ā 

W4-88 (LT/STh)

NA

Ā 

EAEC

W4-21

ā€“

0.23

Ā 

W4-25

ā€“

Ā 
Ā 

W4-70

AM, AB, C, S, ST

Ā 
Ā 

W4-71

AM, AB, C, S, ST

Ā 

Salmonella

W4-12

ā€“

0.20

Ā 

W4-18

AM, C, S, ST, TC

Ā 
Ā 

W4-30

AM, AB, C, CN, FX, S, ST, TC

Ā 
Ā 

W4-37

AM, CI, CN, FX, S, ST, TC

Ā 
Ā 

W4-44

ā€“

Ā 
Ā 

W4-54

ā€“

Ā 
Ā 

W4-59

ā€“

Ā 
Ā 

W4-68

ā€“

Ā 
Ā 

W4-93

ā€“

Ā 

EIEC/Shigella

W4-69

AM

0.09

ETEC

S-5 (LT/STh)

AM, C, ST, TC

0.16

Ā 

S-13 (LT/STh)

NA

Ā 
Ā 

S-24 (LT)

ā€“

Ā 
Ā 

S-31 (LT/STh)

NA

Ā 
Ā 

S-84 (LT/STh)

NA

Ā 
Ā 

S-85 (LT/STh)

AM, C, TC

Ā 
Ā 

S-86 (LT)

NA

Ā 
Ā 

S-87 (LT)

AM, ST, TC

Ā 

EPEC

S-19

AM, ST

0.18

Salmonella

S-29

AM, AB, C, CI, CN, NA, S, ST, TC

0.41

Ā 

S-43

ā€“

Ā 

EIEC/Shigella

S-55

AM, FX

0.14

Ā 

S-56

AM, FX

Ā 
Ā 

S-66

ā€“

Ā 
Ā 

S-67

AM, FX

Ā 

ETEC

C-32 (LT/STh)

AM, C, TC

0.23

Ā 

L-39 (STp)

AM, AB, C, TC

Ā 
Ā 

L-40 (LT/STh)

AM, C, TC

Ā 
Ā 

L-63 (STp)

AM, NA

Ā 
Ā 

L-64 (LT/STh)

AM, NA

Ā 
Ā 

L-81 (LT/STh)

AM, AB, C, TC

Ā 
Ā 

L-82 (STh)

NA

Ā 
Ā 

L-83 (LT/STh)

NA

Ā 

Salmonella

L-11

ā€“

0.36

Ā 

L-28

AM, C, CI, CN, NA, S, ST, TC

Ā 
Ā 

C-36

AM, C, CI, CN, NA, S, ST, TC

Ā 
Ā 

L-92

ā€“

Ā 
  1. ā€“, antibiotic sensitive strain
  2. aStrain code was assigned based on the sample type and sampling site, followed by the numerical order of bacterial isolation: water (W), lettuce (L), chard (C) and soil (S) and sites (2, 3 and 4). No pathogens were detected at site 1
  3. bMAR index calculated for each enteropathogenic category
  4. cETEC strains were characterized by presence of one of the toxin genes (LT/STh/STp)