Table 7 Aggregated fuzzy weights of the criteria and alternatives
From: Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TODIM methods for landfill location selection
| Â | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | Fuzzy weight criteria wj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | (0.66;0.92;1) | (0.25;0.5;0.75) | (0.5;0.75;0.92) | (0.08;0.25;0.5) | (0.5;0.75;0.91) |
C2 | (0.33;0.5;0.66) | (0.41;0.66;0.92) | (0.33;0.58;0.83) | (0.33;0.5;0.66) | (0.33;0.58;0.75) |
C3 | (0.66;0.92;1) | (0.25;0.5;0.75) | (0.5;0.75;0.92) | (0.08;0.25;0.5) | (0.16;0.75;0.66) |
C4 | (0.08;0.25;0.5) | (0.58;0.83;1) | (0.08;0.33;0.58) | (0.08;0.16;0.41) | (0.25;0.5;0.75) |
C5 | (0.66;0.92;1) | (0.41;0.66;0.83) | (0.33;0.58;0.83) | (0.16;0.33;0.58) | (0.58;0.83;1) |
C6 | (0.66;0.92;1) | (0.25;0.5;0.75) | (0.5;0.75;0.92) | (0.08;0.25;0.5) | (0;0.16;0.14) |
C7 | (0.41;0.58;0.75) | (0.41;0.66;0.92) | (0;0.083;0.33) | (0.66;0.92;1) | (0.58;1.16;1) |
C8 | (0.5;0.75;0.92) | (0.08;0.25;0.5) | (0.25;0.5;0.75) | (0.58;0.83;0.91) | (0.33;0.58;0.83) |