Table 21 Global performance of alternative locations and ranking
From: Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TODIM methods for landfill location selection
| Â | Global performance | Rank |
|---|---|---|
A1 | 0.3004 | 1 |
A2 | 0.2655 | 2 |
A3 | 0.2205 | 3 |
A4 | 0.2224 | 4 |
From: Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TODIM methods for landfill location selection
| Â | Global performance | Rank |
|---|---|---|
A1 | 0.3004 | 1 |
A2 | 0.2655 | 2 |
A3 | 0.2205 | 3 |
A4 | 0.2224 | 4 |