Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison of the results (CF, PRD)

From: Comparison study of EMG signals compression by methods transform using vector quantization, SPIHT and arithmetic coding

Compression factor (%)

70

75

80

85

Norris et al. (2001) for Kheir1

3.90

4.12

5.20

8.02

Berger et al. (2006) for Kheir1

2.57

2.63

3.85

7.01

Berger et al. (2007) for Kheir1

1.79

1.80

2.24

3.13

Filho et al. (2008) for Kheir1

1.21

1.75

2.64

4.18

Trabuco et al. (2014) for Kheir1

 DEA

–

–

3.83

4.82

 DLA

2.00

2.29

2.91

4.40

 DSR

1.90

2.05

2.39

3.58

 RHT

1.85

2.10

2.22

3.31

Proposed method

 Kheir1

    

  DCT

0.30

0.59

1.30

3.22

  DWT

0.20

0.38

0.71

1.45

 Kheir2

  DCT

0.30

0.59

1.28

3.01

  DWT

0.21

0.41

0.77

1.58

 Jouve3

  DCT

0.10

0.2

0.42

1.30

  DWT

0.05

0.10

0.18

0.4