Skip to main content

Table 3 Successive binary logistic regression analyses (the whole sample, n = 2076)

From: Differences in technology innovation R&D performance creation behavior between for-profit institutions and not-for-profit institutions

   Model (1) Model (2) Model (3)
Response variable (Level) B1 (0, 1a) B2 (0, 1a) B3 (0, 1a)
Level (Count) 0 (1171) 0 (1258) 0 (1516)
   1 (905) 1 (818) 1 (560)
   Total (2076) Total (2076) Total (2076)
Predictor variable (Level) X1   X1   X1  
   T1 (Lb, U, R, S) T1 (Lb, U, R, S) T1 (Lb, U, R, S)
   T2 (Sgb, Cs, Cd) T2 (Sgb, Cs, Cd) T2 (Sgb, Cs, Cd)
     B1 (0b, 1) B1 (0b, 1)
       B2 (0b, 1)
Variable Level Coefficient (Z value) Odds ratio Coefficient (Z value) Odds ratio Coefficient (Z value) Odds ratio
Intercept   −1.256 (−6.28)   −0.910 (−4.55)   −3.940 (−12.24)  
X1   0.283 (10.04***) 1.33 0.028 (1.15) 1.03 0.021 (0.57) 1.02
T1 U 0.343 (1.65*) 1.41 −1.770 (−5.48***) 0.17 −0.942 (−1.88*) 0.39
  R 0.225 (1.30) 1.25 −0.927 (−4.77***) 0.40 −0.307 (−1.06) 0.74
  S 0.187 (1.43) 1.21 0.702 (5.39***) 2.02 0.433 (2.29**) 1.54
T2 Cs 0.060 (0.33) 1.06 0.021 (0.12) 1.02 0.038 (0.15) 1.04
  Cd 0.419 (2.53**) 1.52 −0.014 (−0.08) 0.99 0.516 (2.19**) 1.68
B1 1    0.376 (3.79***) 1.46 0.420 (3.06***) 1.52
B2 1      3.603 (21.65***) 36.72
Model significance test
 Log Likelihood   −1322.902   −1286.288   −727.612  
 Chi-Sq   197.967   211.403   965.432  
 DF   6   7   8  
 P value   0.000***   0.000***   0.000***  
Measures of association
 Somers’ D   0.37   0.34   0.76  
 Goodman–Kruskal γ   0.37   0.34   0.77  
 Kendall’s τ A   0.18   0.16   0.30  
Prediction pair type   Count Proportion Count Proportion Count Proportion
Concordant pairs   720,302 0.680 674,699 0.656 743,362 0.876
Discordant pairs   332,881 0.314 329,685 0.320 96,802 0.114
Tied pairs   6572 0.006 24,660 0.024 8796 0.010
Total   1,059,755 1.000 1,029,044 1.000 848,960 1.000
  1. aReference case (i.e., Success)
  2. bReference level