Skip to main content

Table 2 Interpretation and considered values of the parameters

From: Mathematical modelling of bacterial resistance to multiple antibiotics and immune system response

Parameter

Description

Value

References

\(\beta_{S}\)

Growth rate of sensitive bacteria

0.8 day−1

Mondragón et al. (2014)

\(( {1 - c} )\beta_{S}, \,0 < c < 1\)

Growth rate of resistant bacteria

0.4–0.1 day−1

Mondragón et al. (2014)-hypothesis

\(k\)

Growth rate of immune cells

0.6 day−1

Pugliese and Gandolfi (2008)

\(\eta\)

Rate of bacteria destroyed by immune cells

0.3 day−1

Pugliese and Gandolfi (2008)

\(\omega\)

Rate to the amount of present bacteria of carrying capacity of immune cells

1

Hypothesis

\(T\)

Carrying capacity of bacteria

109 bacteria

Alavez et al. (2006)

\(\overline{{\alpha_{1} }}\)

Mutation rate of INH

10−6 mut×gen

Coll (2009)

\(\overline{{\alpha_{2} }}\)

Mutation rate of PZA

0

Mondragón et al. (2014)

\(\overline{{d_{1} }}\)

Elimination rate of sensitive bacteria due INH

0.0039 day−1

Zhang (2009)

\(\overline{{d_{2} }}\)

Elimination rate of sensitive bacteria due PZA

0.0001625 day−1

Alavez et al. (2006)

\(\delta_{1}\)

Daily dose of INH

5 mg/kg/day

Coll (2009)

\(\delta_{2}\)

Daily dose of ZPA

35–20 mg/kg/day

Coll (2009)

\(\mu_{1}\)

Uptake rate of INH

0.06 day−1

Esteva et al. (2011)

\(\mu_{2}\)

Uptake rate of PZA

0.03 day−1

Esteva et al. (2011)

  1. Datas are deduced from the literature
  2. The values obtained from this table are that (i) in the first case, \(A = 0.260674\), \(B = 0.571428\) \(\left( {A < B} \right)\) and so, \(E_{2} = \left( {0,0.5714,0.5714,1, \ldots ,1} \right)\) is LAS. (ii) in the second case, \(A = 0.334538\), \(B = 0.25\) \(\left( {A > B} \right)\) and so, \(E_{3} = \left( {0.3337,0.0008,0.3345,1,1, \ldots ,1} \right)\) is LAS
  3. Among the treatment regimen recommended by WHO includes isoniazid (INH) and pyrazinamide (PZA) for some bacterial infectious (such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis) (Coll 2009)