Skip to main content

Table 4 Main characteristics and results from different centers using mechanical extraction devices and our center’s results

From: Transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads using Evolution® mechanical dilator sheath: a single center confirmatory experience

Trial

Patient number

Age of patients (years)

Mean implantation duration (months)

Clinical success rate (%)

Procedural success rate (%)

Major complication rate (%)

Minor Complication rate (%)

Husseina et al. (2010)

29

65 ± 19

65 (12–409)

100

86

0

0

Otoa et al. (2011)

23

58 ± 14

74 (25–180)

100

82

0

4.3

Otoa et al. (2012)

66

55 ± 11

85 (22–240)

98.5

87.9

1.5

3

Mazzonea et al. (2013)

48

65 ± 14

101 ± 66.4

97.9

91.7

4.2

2.7

Starcka et al. (2013)

122

60.4

69.6 (1–384)

97

88.9

2

3

Kocabasa et al. (2015)

20

61 ± 19

97 (8–204)

95

95

5

25

Aytemirb et al. (2015)

23

59 ± 13

72 (8–216)

100

95.7

0

0

This studya

41

61 ± 18

88 (6–240)

97.5

95.1

4.8

12.2

  1. aEvolution mechanical lead extraction system
  2. bTightRail mechanical lead extraction system