Skip to main content

Table 4 Accuracy (%) for different feature sets and different classification techniques

From: Comparing writing style feature-based classification methods for estimating user reputations in social media

Feature set

Base learners

Ensemble learning methods

C4.5

NN

SVM

NB

RS-C4.5

RS-NN

RS-SVM

RS-NB

(a) Segmenting type s = like

 F1

60.00

57.50

60.50

60.50

64.00

64.50

65.50

64.50

 F1 + F2

57.00

54.50

58.50

53.00

68.00

68.50

68.50

59.50

 F1 + F2 + F3

57.00

54.50

58.50

52.50

68.00

69.50

69.50

58.50

 F1 + F2 + F3 + F4

62.00

66.00

69.00

65.50

77.00

79.00

93.00

84.50

(b) Segmenting type s = dislike

 F1

55.00

57.00

49.50

47.00

56.00

53.50

54.00

28.50

 F1 + F2

58.50

59.00

57.50

24.00

64.00

67.00

65.50

44.50

 F1 + F2 + F3

58.50

59.00

57.50

24.00

63.50

68.50

65.00

44.50

 F1 + F2 + F3 + F4

68.00

71.50

74.00

65.50

86.00

93.50

94.00

85.50

(c) Segmenting type s = sum

 F1

67.50

66.00

60.50

64.50

72.50

68.00

63.00

63.50

 F1 + F2

71.00

65.00

66.00

62.00

74.50

59.50

72.00

71.50

 F1 + F2 + F3

71.00

66.50

66.00

62.00

72.00

59.00

70.50

71.50

 F1 + F2 + F3 + F4

62.00

62.00

67.00

58.50

76.50

50.00

82.50

79.50

(d) Segmenting type s = portfolio

 F1

59.50

60.00

60.00

57.00

59.00

57.00

61.50

66.00

 F1 + F2

65.50

62.50

63.50

60.00

71.50

65.00

77.50

74.00

 F1 + F2 + F3

65.50

57.00

63.50

60.00

73.50

69.50

70.50

75.00

 F1 + F2 + F3 + F4

64.50

70.50

72.50

76.50

80.00

87.00

94.50

88.50

  1. The best result for each segmenting type is highlighted as italics, and the best result over all the segmenting types is additionally highlighted as bold italics