Table 6 Average percentage of each integer among the ten IEC algorithms designed by ten runs of our offline meta-level approach
Problem | 0: re-evaluation (random) (%) | 1: re-evaluation (mutation) (%) | 2: random (%) | 3: crossover (random) (%) | 4: crossover (mutation) (%) | 5: mutation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sphere | 5.0 | 94.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 |
Rosenbrock | 4.5 | 92.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 |
Griewank | 5.0 | 94.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 |
Ackley | 4.0 | 81.75 | 1.25 | 3.75 | 7.5 | 1.75 |
Levy | 13.0 | 22.75 | 8.0 | 24.5 | 28.75 | 3.0 |
Rastrigin | 17.25 | 20.75 | 5.5 | 30.25 | 24.25 | 2.0 |