Table 7 Results of applying the evolved fuzzy rules to the 2013 ACS microfile
From: Evolutionary approach to violating group anonymity using third-party data
| State | Number of outliers in the quantity signal | Number of undisclosed outliers | Number of outliers in the auxiliary quantity signal | Number of false outliers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Alaska | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Arizona | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| California | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Colorado | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Connecticut | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Florida | 7 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
| Georgia | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 |
| Hawaii | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Illinois | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Kansas | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Kentucky | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Louisiana | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Maryland | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Mississippi | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Missouri | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Nevada | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| New Jersey | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| New Mexico | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| New York | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| North Carolina | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Ohio | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| Oklahoma | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| South Carolina | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Texas | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Virginia | 7 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
| Washington | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Total | 81 | 39 | 50 | 8 |