Table 2 Studies radiological methods quality assessment
Modality of imaging | Timing of imaging | Weight bearing | Protocol/standardisation | Rater reliability assessment | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Berend et al. (2004) | SLR | At follow up | Y | U | N | High risk |
Bonner et al. (2011) | LLR | 6 months | Y | Standardised | N | Low risk |
Fang et al. (2009) | SLR | Varied | Y | Y | N | High risk |
Kim et al. (2014) | CT, LLR | 1 week | Y | Y | Y | Low risk |
Magnussen et al. (2011) | LLR | Follow up | Y | YRoutine for Database | Y | Low risk |
Morgan et al. (2008) | LLR | Immediate post op | Y | Y | N | low risk |
Parratte et al. (2010) | LLR | 2–3 month post op | Y | YStandardised protocol | Y | Low risk |
Ritter et al. (2011) | SLR | Latest follow up | Y | U | N | High Risk |