Skip to main content

Table 1 A table demonstrating key characteristics of the studies selected for review

From: Does malalignment affect revision rate in total knee replacements: a systematic review of the literature

Author

Study design

Sample size

Follow up (mean range)

Number of patients lost to follow up

Final study sample size

Quality assessment score

Judgement risk on bias

Berend et al. (2004)—CORR

Case series

8598 (5535) from database

5 years

2–14.2 years

 

3152 (2125). 41 tibial failures were analysed

AHRQ—All four factors were present

Low risk

Fang et al. (2009)—J Arthro

Case series

6070 (3992) from database

6.6 years

2–22.5 years

1118 (28.0 %) patients died

6277

AHRQ—All four factors were present

Low risk

Ritter et al. (2011)—JBJS

Case series

9483

7.6 ± 3.8 years

2–22.5 years

3404

6079

AHRQ—All four factors were present

Low risk

Kim et al. (2014)—international orthopaedics

Case series

3150

15.8 years

11–18 years

102

3048

AHRQ—three out of four factors present

Low risk

Morgan et al. (2008)—international orthopaedics

Case series

197

9 years

No mention

197

AHRQ—two out of four factors present

Unclear/high risk

Parratte et al. (2010)—JBJS

Case control

417

Minimum 15 years

19

398

Ottawa—Newcastle score eight

Low risk

Bonner et al. (2011)—JBJS

Case control

501

9.8 years

?–15 years

184 (died before last review, however, survival data included in analysis)

458

Ottawa—Newcastle score seven

Low risk

Magnussen et al. (2011)—CORR

Case control

608

Median 4.7 years

2–19.8 years

55

553

Ottawa—Newcastle score seven

Low risk