Skip to main content

Table 2 Overview of defining parameters of compared methods and their recommended usage

From: Limb volume measurements: comparison of accuracy and decisive parameters of the most used present methods

 

Water Displ.

Frustum Sign

Disc Model

Partial Frustum

MRI

CT

Accuracya

0.3 %

2–8 %b

1–8 %b

1–8 %b,c

Finger 8 %

Hand 2 %

Finger 2 %

Hand 0.5 %

Repeatabilityd

Finger 2 %

Forearm 0.9 %

2–6 %b

Finger 3–4 %

Forearm 1–2 %b

Finger 3–4 %

Forearm 1–2 %b

5 %

2 %

Measure time

Finger 3 min

Other 15 min

1 min.

Finger 8 min

Forearm 14 min

Finger 8 min

Forearm 14 min

Hand 19 min

Hand 7 min

Processing time

Less than 1 min

Less than 1 mine

1 mine

1 mine

12 min

7 min

Measurement costf

Less than 1 EUR

Less than 1 EUR

Less than 1 EUR

Less than 1 EUR

250–300 EUR

100 EUR

Operator dependencyg

None

High

High

High

Low

Low

Special region measurementsh

No

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Limitations

Shivering body, flexibility of limb, infection

Almost none

Claustrophobia, no metal (piercing, pacemaker,…)

High radiation dose, artefacts on metal parts

Recommended use

Best for accurate measurements of flexible and non-infected limbs. Good for standard use

When very fast, but not accurate (only estimation) of volume is required. Use the same staff to avoid operator dependency

No reason to use this method, same usage as Partial Frustumc

Use this, when better accuracy is required, but patient does not meet the limitations of Water Disp. Use the same staff

Use this in case of specific measurement region, where high accuracy is not necessary or in case of repeated measurements

Use this, when accurate measurement of specific region is required and the measurement is single shot only

  1. aAccuracy is defined as relative deviation of mean value from reference value (see Accuracy and repeatability experimentssection)
  2. bStrongly dependant on person performing measurements
  3. cApproximation of volume is more authentic than Disc Model, so accuracy should be theoretically higher. However, no significant difference was experimentally detected
  4. dRepeatability is SD of measurements performed by same staff (see “Accuracy and repeatability experiments ” section)
  5. eIn case of writing the values into the auto-computing computer worksheet
  6. fRefers to all the expenses on the measurement, including acquisition cost proportion relevant to one measurement
  7. gIf resulting measured value depends on particular abilities of person performing measurement
  8. hAllowing any irregular nonstandard region of interest