From: Exercise-based interventions for cancer survivors in India: a systematic review
References | Exercise intervention | Results | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yoga based interventions | ||||||
Banerjee et al. (2007) | Intervention group 18–24 supervised yoga sessions for 6 weeks consisting of slow stretching, asanas and breathing exercises Control group 3–4 supportive counselling sessions in 6 weeks and light exercises | HADS—anxiety scores a Yoga group: ↓48.2 %; control group: ↑28 % HADS—depression scores a Yoga group: ↓57.5 %; control group: ↑24 % Perceived stress scale a Yoga group: ↓20.4 %; control group: no change DNA damage a Yoga group: ↑934.6 %; Control group: ↑1028.5 % Adverse events none | ||||
Raghavendra et al. (2007) | Intervention group Post-CT bedside yoga relaxation for 30 min; home based yoga module aided by audio and video cassettes; supervised sessions once in 10 days at home by a trainer Control group 30–60 min supporting counselling (information and coping preparation regarding CINV, food aversions and nutrition) during hospital visits for CT | MANE scores | Yoga group | Control group | ||
Post CT nausea frequencyb | 3.6 ± 1.6 | 4.5 ± 0.9 | ||||
Post CT nausea intensityb | 2.3 ± 1.2 | 3.4 ± 1.1 | ||||
Anticipatory nausea intensityb | 0.6 ± 1.03 | 1.7 ± 1.5 | ||||
Anticipatory vomiting intensityc | 0.3 ± 0.67 | 0.87 ± 1.3 | ||||
STAI a | 29.2 ± 3.8 | 37.5 ± 7.6 | ||||
BDI | 6.6 ± 4.6 | 14.2 ± 6.6 | ||||
FLIC a | 142.1 ± 10.2 | 111.7 ± 25.5 | ||||
Adverse events none | ||||||
Rao et al. (2008a) | Intervention group Instructor administered pranayama and yogic relaxation techniques at bed-side prior to surgery and during post-operative period Control group Four in-person supportive counselling and shoulder exercise sessions | Â | Yoga group | Control group | ||
Days drain retaineda | 4.7 ± 1.6 | 6.4 ± 2.5 | ||||
Postop duration (days) | 21.7 ± 9.4 | 24.6 ± 10.9 | ||||
Suture removal interval (days)c | 10.3 ± 3.6 | 12.7 ± 5.2 | ||||
Postop complicationc | 6.1Â % | 22.2Â % | ||||
TNF-α levels ↓27.3 %; ↑40.5 % (pg/ml)a Adverse events NR | ||||||
Rao et al. (2008b) | Intervention group Instructor administered pranayama and yogic relaxation techniques at bed-side prior to surgery and during post-operative period; followed by 4-week home based program monitored telephonically once a week and aided by audio taped instruction Control group Four in-person supportive counselling and shoulder exercise sessions and home program | STAI-anxiety state score b Yoga group: ↓23 %; Control group: ↓22.6 % STAI-anxiety state score b Yoga group: ↓22 %; Control group: ↓15 % BDI b Yoga group: ↓4 %; Control group: No change FLCI b Yoga group: ↓2 %; Control group: ↓8 % IgG c Yoga group: ↑5.3 %; Control group: ↑43.1 % IgA b Yoga group: ↑2.7 %; Control group: ↑53.3 % IgM Yoga group: ↑12.5 %; Control group: ↑25 % CD4+ c Yoga group: ↓3.6 %; Control group: ↓3.5 % CD8+ b Yoga group: ↓1.9 %; Control group: ↓3.7 % CD56+ b Yoga group: 0.7 %; Control group: ↓4.3 % Adverse events none | ||||
Vadiraja et al. (2009a) | Intervention group At least three in-person sessions/wk of a set of breathing exercises, pranayama and yogic relaxation techniques for 6Â weeks during adjuvant RT in hospital and self-practice as homework on the remaining days. Audio taped instructions provided for home practice sessions Control group 15-min counselling sessions every 10Â days for 6Â weeks | Â | Yoga group | Control group | ||
PANAS scale | ||||||
Positive affectb | 27.8 ± 7.1 | 23.3 ± 8.3 | ||||
Negative affectb | 12.9 ± 10.39 | 21.8 ± 10.8 | ||||
EORTCQoL C30 | ||||||
Physical function | 73.2 ± 25.2 | 68.9 ± 30.1 | ||||
Role function | 79.8 ± 34.4 | 72.8 ± 39.9 | ||||
Emotional functionb | 75.1 ± 21.1 | 59.2 ± 23.3 | ||||
Cognitive functionc | 90.5 ± 15.8 | 80.7 ± 24.1 | ||||
Social function | 54.9 ± 23.9 | 49.9 ± 24.2 | ||||
Adverse events none | ||||||
Vadiraja et al. (2009b) | Same as in Vadiraja et al. (2009a) | Â | Yoga group | Control group | ||
RSCL | ||||||
Psychological distressb | 4.2 ± 3.3 | 7.7 ± 3.4 | ||||
Physical distressc | 10.8 ± 8.1 | 15.0 ± 8.0 | ||||
Activity level | 20.2 ± 5.6 | 17.7 ± 6.2 | ||||
EORTCQoL C30 | ||||||
Fatigueb | 33.2 ± 23.8 | 50.5 ± 22.3 | ||||
Painb | 24.4 ± 28.5 | 41.3 ± 28.9 | ||||
Dyspnea | 6.67 ± 15.2 | 9.8 ± 16.9 | ||||
Insomniac | 24.4 ± 30.4 | 37.9 ± 31.7 | ||||
Nausea and vomiting | 9.6 ± 19.6 | 9.9 ± 17.3 | ||||
Appetite lossc | 17 ± 23.1 | 31.1 ± 28.1 | ||||
Diarrhoea | 0.7 ± 4.9 | 3.8 ± 12.8 | ||||
Constipation | 8.1 ± 23.7 | 9.1 ± 21.9 | ||||
Adverse events none | ||||||
Vadiraja et al. (2009c) | Same as in Vadiraja et al. (2009a) | Â | Yoga group | Control group | ||
Diurnal salivary cortisol | ||||||
6 a.m.c | 0.22 ± 0.15 | 0.36 ± 0.24 | ||||
9 a.m. | 0.19 ± 0.14 | 0.24 ± 0.23 | ||||
9 p.m. | 0.16 ± 0.16 | 0.16 ± 0.14 | ||||
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale | ||||||
HADS anxiety scorea | 4.8 ± 3.3 | 8.1 ± 3.8 | ||||
HADS depression scoreb | 4.1 ± 3.4 | 6.5 ± 3.7 | ||||
Perceive stress scalea | 15.1 ± 4.8 | 20.1 ± 5.8 | ||||
Adverse events none | ||||||
Kumar et al. (2013) | Intervention group Participants were trained in Sudarshan Kriya and Pranayam through a 18-h contact program over a three-day period by trained yoga teachers. The program included teachings for self‑awareness Ujjayi breath, Bhastrika pranayama and rhythmic breathing. A 20-min home program was given for practice at home. In addition, they also received counselling and pain treatment as per WHO ladder of NSAID and morphine group of medicines Control group WHO ladder of NSAID and morphine group of medicines and counselling |  | Yoga group | Control group | ||
Serum cortisolb (ngm/l mean ± SE) | 341.4 ± 51.4 | 549.2 ± 69.5 | ||||
Pain perception | ↓By three points in on 0–10 verbal scale of pain in the intervention group compared to control group | |||||
Chakrabarty et al. (2013) | Intervention group 6-week hospital based program consisting of Sheethali, Brahmari and Nadisodhna Prayanama. Program duration of 18 min/session, twice a day × 5 days/week Control group: no intervention |  | Yoga group | Control group | ||
Protein thiolsa µmol/l | 271.2 ± 91.2 | 216.1 ± 62.8 | ||||
Glutathione b mg/hHb (Median, IQR) | 24.2; 18.3, 30.5 | 19.1; 18.0–24.6 | ||||
Adverse events none | ||||||
Physiotherapy based interventions | ||||||
Chopra et al. (2006) | One supervised and two unsupervised 15–20 min sessions of inspiratory and expiratory manoeuvres and forced abdominal expiration techniques for 8–10 days |  | Pre training (mean) | Post training (mean) | ||
Breath hold time (s) | 31.4 | 44.5 | ||||
Tidal volume (ml) | 560 | 1160 | ||||
Adverse events not reported | ||||||
Gautam et al. (2011) | Warm up with active ROM exercise for shoulder, PRE for upper limb muscle groups, exercise program hand-out with logbook, and telephonic monitoring once a week PRE program Intensity: start with 50–60 % of 10 RM and progress as tolerated Repetitions: 1 set of 8–10 repetitions, increase to 12–15 repetitions Sets: start with 1 set, progress to 2 sets of 12–15 repetitions before increasing weight by 5–10 % Frequency: 5 days/week |  | Pre-exercise | Post-exercise | ||
SF 36—PCSc | 41.2 | 46.3 | ||||
SF 36—MCSc | 38.5 | 48.3 | ||||
Limb volume (ml)a | 2306.3 ± 627.8 | 2183.4 ± 597.4 | ||||
Limb circumference (cm) | ||||||
MCP jointsc | 19.1 ± 1.4 | 19.0 ± 1.3 | ||||
Wrist jointa | 16.4 ± 2.9 | 16.2 ± 1.9 | ||||
15 cm DLEa | 22.1 ± 3.1 | 21.4 ± 2.8 | ||||
10 cm PLEa | 31.0 ± 4.3 | 30.0 ± 4.4 | ||||
Adverse events not reported | ||||||
Kumar et al. (2013) | Mechanism based physical therapy consisting of educational, cognitive-behavioural therapy and physical therapy approaches | Â | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | ||
BPI—Cancer paina | 75.25 ± 3.77 | 40.12 ± 4.08 | ||||
EORTCQoL C30 global health status/QoLa | 42.5 ± 9.1 | 68 ± 6.59 | ||||
Adverse events not reported | ||||||
Samuel et al. (2013) | Intervention group 6-week brisk walking programme and active exercise programme for muscle groups of upper limb and lower limb. Intensity: RPE of 3–5/10; duration: 15–20 min Frequency: 5 days/week Progression as tolerated Control group Advised to remain as physically active as possible Home exercise program after study completion |  | Intervention group | Control group | ||
6MWDa Median change; (IQR) | 20; (0, 46.) | −100.8; (−189, 53) | ||||
SF 36—PCS | No change | ↓18 % | ||||
SF 36—MCS | ↑11.7 %c | ↓75.2 %b | ||||
Adverse events none | ||||||
Speech therapy based interventions | ||||||
Subbarao et al. (1991) | Group I: commenced planned ST 2–3 weeks post operatively Group II: received ST 1 yr after surgery Speech therapy which consisted of individual and group therapy sessions | ↑improved proficiency in esophageal speech at various levels (Belch, Monosyllable, Bisyllable and simple sentences) in group I compared to group II Adverse events none | ||||
Premalatha et al. (1997) | 20–25 ST sessions of 30–40 min* 1–2 sessions/day ST included Inhalation technique, Inhalation combined with changing neck position and digital pressure. | ↑Quality of voice and Speech intelligibility; better in patients using digital pressure. (No statistical analysis available) Adverse events None | ||||
Bachher et al. (2002) | Supervised and home based ST to correct dyslalia and deglutition. 4 week supervised program: first 2 weeks @ 25–30 min/day; 3rd week @ 3 sessions/week; 4th week @ 2 sessions/week 3 months of home program: 15-min therapy sessions after every 1 h | Improvement in speech and deglutition (No statistical analysis available) Adverse events not reported | ||||
John et al. (2011) | 15 sessions of 30Â min duration Program details: range of motion exercises, compensatory swallowing techniques and counselling on the altered swallowing manoeuvre | Improvement in swallowing, speech intelligibility, speech rate and articulation Adverse events not reported |