Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the 12 selected articles regarding CIMT of KD patients and controls

From: Reassessment of carotid intima-media thickness by standard deviation score in children and adolescents after Kawasaki disease

First author year (ref.)

KD patients

Age (years)

Male (%)

Follow-up (years)

Controls (n)

Age (years)

Measurements; site

Tracing

CIMT(KD) (mm)

CIMT(Cont) (mm)

p value

Remarks

Int (n)

Ect (n)

Reg (n)

An (n)

Giat (n)

Noto et al. (2001)

0

0

0

20

0

16.6 ± 4.1

66

9.8

20

16.3 ± 4.7

Mean; far wall CCA

Manual

0.53 ± 0.07

0.46 ± 0.05

<0.050

An vs. Cont

Kadono et al. (2005)

0

0

9

15

0

8.3 ± 4.1

54

5.8

41

10.7 ± 4.4

Mean; far wall CCA

Manual

0.45 ± 0.07

0.46 ± 0.06

0.544

Reg + An vs. Cont

Ikemoto et al. (2005)

31

16

0

8

10

12.7 ± 3.5

58

12

20

16.2 ± 4.0

Mean; far wall CCA

Manual

0.52 ± 0.05

0.50 ± 0.04

0.220

Giat vs. Cont

Cheung et al. (2007)

24

0

0

26

0

8.6 ± 2.8

66

7.4

22

9.5 ± 2.2

Mean; far wall CCA

Manual

0.41 ± 0.04

0.36 ± 0.04

<0.001

An vs. Cont

Della Pozza et al. (2007)

5

0

0

15

0

12.1 ± 4.7

60

4.1

28

12.0 ± 3.1

Mean; far wall CCA

Automated

0.44 ± 0.02

0.42 ± 0.01

<0.001

Int + An vs. Cont

Cheung et al. (2008)

19

0

6

26

0

13.4 ± 0.6

78

10.5

32

14.6 ± 0.6

Mean; far wall CCA

Automated

0.44 ± 0.02

0.42 ± 0.02

0.006

An vs. Cont

Noto et al. (2009)

0

0

0

35

0

20.5 ± 9.3

80

18.6

35

19.6 ± 7.2

Mean; far wall CCA

Manual

0.57 ± 0.15

0.47 ± 0.01

<0.001

An vs. Cont

Gupta-Malhotra et al. (2009)

19

0

9

0

0

20.9 ± 6.0

67

16.6

27

21.3 ± 7.5

Mean; far wall CCA

Manual

0.49 ± 0.07

0.48 ± 0.06

0.905

Int + Reg vs. Cont

Lee et al. (2009)

0

0

25

0

0

12.6 ± 2.0

ND

8

55

14.5 ± 0.7

Mean; far wall CCA

Manual

0.41 ± 0.19

0.50 ± 0.01

0.026

Reg vs. Cont

Meena et al. (2013)

17

0

9

1

0

8.2 ± 2.6

74

2.6

23

8.4 ± 2.9

Mean; far wall CCA

Manual

0.49 ± 0.07

0.41 ± 0.06

<0.001

Int + Reg + An vs. Cont

Selamet Tierney et al. (2013)

136

20

0

40

7

16.7 ± 4.2

60

11.6

50

17.5 ± 4.3

Mean; far wall CCA

Automated

0.44 ± 0.03

0.43 ± 0.03

0.420

Int + Ect + An + Giat vs. Cont

Ishikawa and Iwasahima (2013)

15

0

0

9

0

7.2 ± 2.3

58

3.3

22

7.9 ± 2.8

Mean; far wall CCA

Automated

0.45 ± 0.03

0.43 ± 0.04

0.906

Int vs. An vs. Cont

  1. An coronary aneurysm, Cont controls, CIMT carotid intima-media thickness, Ect ectasia, Giat giant aneurysm, Int intact, ND not described, Reg regression