Skip to main content

Table 1 Diversity statistics among reads from grouped samples

From: Microbial community profiles of the colon from steers differing in feed efficiency

Feed efficiency group

Sampling type

No. of sequences

No. of OTUsa,b

Chao1b

Shannon diversity indexb

Equitabilityb

Good’s coverage (%)

ADGhigh–ADFI chigh

Subsampled readsd

100,000

5,764 ± 878

9,638 ± 2,004

7.85 ± 0.52

0.58 ± 0.02

97.13 ± 0.59

ADGhigh–ADFI clow

Subsampled readsd

100,000

6,098 ± 1,028

9,874 ± 1,853

8.15 ± 0.39

0.60 ± 0.02

97.02 ± 0.60

ADGlow–ADFI clow

Subsampled readsd

100,000

6,714 ± 1,148

11,538 ± 2,333

8.27 ± 0.49

0.60 ± 0.03

96.53 ± 0.71

ADGlow–ADFI chigh

Subsampled readsd

100,000

6,063 ± 1,129

10,052 ± 2,003

7.92 ± 0.74

0.59 ± 0.02

96.99 ± 0.61

  1. aOTUs represents operational taxonomic units.
  2. bWithin a column, means for the individual subsamples did not differ (P < 0.05).
  3. c n = 8 among groups.
  4. dMeans among the groups were compared using ANOVA and the Tukey’s test.