|
TeR
|
Expert judgement (technology mix (t.mix))
|
modelled as the t.mix
|
very similar to the t.mix
|
similar to the t.mix
|
different to the t.mix
|
totally different to the t.mix or not assessed
|
|
GR
|
Expert judgement (share of referenced countries (r.c.))
|
Fulfil totally the share of r.c.
|
Fulfil very similarly the share of r.c.
|
fulfil similarly the share of r.c.
|
Fulfil differ-rently the share of r.c
|
Fulfil completely different the share r.c.
|
|
TiR
|
Expert judgement (defined time (d.t.) on data inventory)
|
All the data sources refer to d.t.
|
The majority of the data sources refer to the d.t.
|
At least half of the data sources refer to the d.t.
|
Less than half of data sources refer to the d.t.
|
None the data sources refer to the d.t.
|
|
C
|
No. of impact categories weighted on% of elementary flows
|
15-16 impact categories
|
12-14 impact categories
|
8-11 impact categories
|
5-7 impact categories
|
≤5 impact categories
|
|
P
|
Expert judgement precision/uncertainty (p/u) of data sources
|
Very low u. and/or very high p.
|
Low u. and/or high p.
|
Fair u. and/or fair p.
|
High u. and/or low p.
|
Very high u. and/or very low p.
|
|
M
|
expert judgement (system boundaries, multifunctionality and EoL) based on the situation (European Commission JRC, Institute for Environment and Sustainability 2010a), completion (C.) degree
|
all LCA stag-es, allocation procedures. C. in a very high degree
|
Most relevant LCA stages. allocation procedures. C. in a high degree
|
Sufficient LCA stages. allocation procedures. C. in a suffi-cient degree
|
Sufficient LCA stages. allocation procedures. C. in a low degree
|
Not sufficient LCA stages. No allocation procedures (multi-functionality not solved according to the situation) C. in a low degree
|
