Quality indicator | Sub-quality parameters | Rating | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 (Very Good) | 2 (Good) | 3 (Fair) | 4 (Poor) | 5 (Very Poor) | ||
TeR | Expert judgement based on the consideration of a technology mix | Technology aspects have been modelled as the technology mix | Technology aspects are very similar to the technology mix | Technology aspects are similar to the technology mix | Technology aspects are different to the technology mix | Technology aspects are completely different to the technology mix, or tech not deployed |
GR | Expert judgement based on geographical coverage of data | The list of countries is the same as the referenced countries | The list of countries is very similar to the referenced countries | The list of countries is slightly different from the referenced countries | The list of countries is significantly different from the referenced countries | The list of countries is totally different from the referenced countries |
TiR | Expert judgement based on defined time on data inventory (±5 years) | All the data sources refer to the defined time | The majority of the data sources refer to the defined time | At least half of the data sources refer to the defined time | Less than half of the data sources refer to the defined time | None of the data sources refer to the defined time |
C | Consideration of impact categories and share of elementary flows (to adjust the final rating) | 15-16 considered impact categories | 12-14 considered impact categories | 8-11 considered impact categories | 5-7 considered impact categories | <5 considered impact categories |
P | Expert judgement based on the precision/uncertainty of data sources | Very low uncertainty and/or very high precision | Low uncertainty and/or high precision | Fair uncertainty and/or fair precision | High uncertainty and/or low precision | Very high uncertainty and/or very low precision |
M | Definition of situation context and subsequent expert judgement of system boundaries, multi-functionality and EoL | Inclusion of all LCA stages (with the EoL stage). Consideration of allocation procedures. Completion in a very high degree | Inclusion of most relevant LCA stages. Consideration of allocation procedures. Completion in a high degree | Inclusion of a still sufficient LCA stages. Consideration of allocation procedures. Completion in a sufficient degree | Inclusion of a sufficient LCA stages. Consideration of allocation procedures. Completion in a low degree | No inclusion of sufficient LCA stages. No consideration of allocation procedures (multi-functionality has not been solved according to the situation context). Completion in a low degree |