Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk of bias of the included studies judged by the review authors

From: A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain

First author, publication year

Random sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding of participants

Blinding of outcome assessment

Duration

Aurilio 2009

Unclear

High

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Bohme 2003

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Low

Unclear

Bono 1997

Low

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Brema 1996

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Low

De Conno 1987

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Dini 1986

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Kjaer 1982

Unclear

High

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Likar 2007

Unclear

Low

High

High

Low

Noda 1989

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

High

Pace 2007

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Poulain 2008

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Sittl 2003

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

High

Sorge 2004

Low

High

High

Unclear

Unclear

Taguchi 1982

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Ventafridda 1983

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Wirz 2009

Low

Unclear

High

High

High

  1. Low: low risk of bias; high: high risk of bias; Unclear: Unclear risk of bias.