Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of tiger captures rate and density derived from camera traps in Pakke Tiger Reserve, India and other tropical rain forest in Southeast Asia

From: Tiger density in a tropical lowland forest in the Eastern Himalayan Mountains

Location

Code

Country

Total camera days

Total no. photos

Total no. tigers

Effective sampled area (km2)

Tiger density (no./100 km2)

Capture/100 trap days

Pakke Tiger Reserve (Present study)

PTR

India

748

10

4

347

1.15

1.3

Namdapha Tiger Reserve (Datta et al.2008)

NTR

India

1537

0

0

1200

0

0

Gunung Leusera

GL

Indonesia

2686

45

10

550

1.82

1.7

Bukit Barisan Selatana

BBS

Indonesia

4064

19

9

836

1.08

0.5

Kerinchi Seblata

KS

Indonesia

5316

62

16

800

2.00

1.2

Halabala WS, Narathiwa Provincea

HWS

Thailand

999

9

2

166.7

1.20

0.9

Queen Sirikit Reserve Forest, Yala Provincea

QSR

Thailand

683

17

3

166.7

1.80

2.5

Phu Khieo WS, Chaiyaphum Provincea

PKWS

Thailand

989

3

1

86.2

1.16

0.3

Khao Yai NP, Nakhon Ratchasima Provincea

KYNP

Thailand

647

2

1

83.3

1.20

0.3

Temenggor Forest Reserve, Peraka

TFR

Malaysia

812

8

2

86.2

0.32

1.0

Bintang Hijau Forest, Peraka

BHF

Malaysia

776

7

2

202

0.99

1.0

Gunung Tebu Forest Reserve, Terngganua

GTF

Malaysia

807

12

1

188.7

0.53

1.5

Ulu Temaing Forest Reserve, Kelantana

UTF

Malaysia

563

15

2

210.5

0.95

2.7

Taman Negaraa

TN

Malaysia

1829

6

4

338.2

1.18

0.3

Bungo primary selectively logged forestb

BP

Sumatra

2750

63

10

441

2.95

2.3

Ipuh primary selectively logged forestb

IP

Sumatra

3255

64

15

1227

1.55

2.0

Gunung Basor Forest Reservea

GBFR

Malaysia

2496

18

6

308

2.59

0.7

  1. aCarbone et al.2001.
  2. bLinkie et al.2008.