Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients who underwent carotid artery stenting with different filter-based embolic protection devices

From: Treatment outcomes of carotid artery stenting with two types of distal protection filter device

 

FilterWire1(n = 121)

Spider2(n = 37)

p-value

Age, sex

Mean age (years)

72.6 ± 9.0

71.1 ± 8.6

0.39*

Male

104 (84%)

29 (78%)

0.26**

Cardiovascular risk factor

Diabetes mellitus

38 (31%)

13 (37%)

0.67**

Hypertension

96 (79%)

29 (78%)

0.89**

Dyslipidemia

58 (48%)

20 (54%)

0.51**

Atrial fibrillation

15 (11%)

4 (11%)

0.79**

History of cardiovascular disease

22 (18%)

6 (16%)

0.78**

Presenting symptom

Cerebral infarction

53 (43%)

18 (48%)

0.60**

TIA3 or amaurosis fugax

11 (9.1%)

4 (11%)

0.75**

Asymptomatic

57 (47%)

15 (41%)

0.48**

Degree of carotid artery stenosis

77.5 ± 13.1

75.2 ± 14.6

0.39*

  1. 1FilterWire EZ™.
  2. 2Spider FX™.
  3. 3TIA, transient ischemic attacks.
  4. *Independent t-test; **Pearson’s Chi-squared test.