Skip to main content

Table 1 Means and coefficient of variations of soil nutrient in different land-use patterns

From: Soil nutrient assessment based on attribute recognition model in the Loess Plateau of China

Land use

SOM (%)

Ntotal(%)

Ptotal(%)

Nhydro(mg/kg)

Pavail(mg/kg)

Kavail(mg/kg)

Farmland

6.87bc(0.30)

0.44bc(0.22)

0.57a(0.05)

26.5cd(0.25)

2.06a(0.43)

60.2ab(0.37)

Artificial grassland

6.17c(0.32)

0.35c(0.22)

0.52b(0.03)

25.0d(0.12)

0.87b(0.64)

38.4b(0.15)

Natural grassland

8.11b(0.24)

0.46b(0.32)

0.52b(0.12)

34.8b(0.23)

0.88b(0.13)

70.0a (0.27)

Woodland

10.25a(0.19)

0.61a(0.15)

0.57a(0.06)

44.4a(0.19)

1.01b(0.37)

85.3a(0.47)

Shrubland

7.08bc(0.27)

0.46b(0.27)

0.53ab(0.08)

32.6bc(0.27)

0.72b(0.34)

68.0a(0.39)

Sig. of ANOVA

0.001

0.000

0.031

0.000

0.000

0.020

  1. Means with the same letter in the same row are not significantly different at the 0.05 level (LSD).
  2. Data in the parentheses are coefficient of variation.