Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression coefficients and relative importance of environmental variables predicting responses of forest herb species

From: Hybrid poplar plantations are suitable habitat for reintroduced forest herbs with conservation status

 

Environmental variable

Response variable

Statistic

Elevation

June soil moisture

Soil C:N ratio

Soil Ca

Soil Mg

Soil P

Leaf litter biomass

Diffuse light

Marginal R2of best model*

Asarum: Number of leaves and flowers per plot

Best model coefficients

 

−0.43

 

0.20

    

0.31

Multi-model average coefficients

−0.22

−0.41

−0.08

0.20

−0.01

0.08

0.01

−0.10

 

Importance

0.14

1.00

0.17

0.66

0.11

0.13

0.10

0.31

 

Sanguinaria: Number of leaves and flowers per plot

Best model coefficients

−0.61

 

−0.56

     

0.60

Multi-model average coefficients

−0.61

−0.09

−0.55

−0.07

−0.06

0.11

−0.03

−0.01

 

Importance

0.74

0.11

1.00

0.07

0.06

0.15

0.06

0.05

 

Maianthemum: Sum of leaf lengths per plot

Best model coefficients

 

−0.33

 

0.33

−0.37

  

−0.49

0.36

Multi-model average coefficients

−0.18

−0.35

0.20

0.36

−0.40

0.03

−0.15

−0.49

 

Importance

0.19

0.94

0.31

0.88

0.90

0.10

0.15

1.00

 

Maianthemum: Number of plants flowering

Best model coefficients

−0.56

      

−0.26

0.41

Multi-model average coefficients

−0.55

−0.13

−0.10

−0.07

−0.09

0.01

−0.10

−0.29

 

Importance

1.00

0.17

0.22

0.06

0.15

0.07

0.18

1.00

 

Trillium: Sum of leaf lengths per plot

Best model coefficients

  

0.30

−0.66

    

0.19

Multi-model average coefficients

−0.43

0.13

0.30

−0.61

−0.41

−0.02

−0.15

−0.03

 

Importance

0.03

0.09

0.53

0.78

0.22

0.07

0.12

0.08

 

Trillium: Number of plants flowering

Best model coefficients

      

−0.43

 

0.16

Multi-model average coefficients

 

−0.02

0.09

0.07

−0.02

−0.19

−0.44

−0.18

 

Importance

 

0.05

0.10

0.11

0.10

0.15

0.67

0.08

 
  1. * Represents the proportion of the total variance in the data explained by the fixed effects (Nakagawa and Schielzeth 2013).
  2. Importance values > 0.5 are indicated in bold.