Skip to main content

Table 1 Algal samples used for molecular analysis

From: Identification of harmful cyanobacteria in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Clear Lake, California by DNA barcoding

Location

Sample

APHN

DLCH

GLTR

LMNR

MCRC-AE

WRNC

 

ID

(filmt/mL)

(cells/mL)

(filmt/mL)

(filmt/mL)

(cell/mL)

(cell/mL)

Clear Lake

CL3(6)a

54,950

312,430

136,982

2,355

819,540

ND

  

(4.1%)

(23.6%)

(10.3%)

(0.2%)

(61.8%)

 
 

CL4(7)

ND

ND

648,606

15,700

2,219,587

ND

    

(22.5%)

(0.5%)

(77.0%)

 
 

S2(7)

ND

516,137

1,018,537

406,237

ND

ND

   

(26.6%)

(52.5%)

(20.9%)

  
 

S1(8)

245

179,814

25,267

10,058

ND

ND

  

(0.1%)

(83.5%)

(11.7%)

(4.7%)

  
 

CL1(9)

ND

132,273

ND

5,888

153,467

547,538

   

(15.8%)

 

(0.7%)

(18.3%)

65.2%

Sacramento-

D16(7)

ND

41,998

ND

ND

ND

ND

San Joaquin

  

(100%)

    

Delta

D16(9)

41,409

ND

ND

ND

38,858

ND

  

(51.6%)

   

(48.4%)

 
 

D19(9)

70,846

2,551

ND

ND

ND

ND

  

(96.5%)

(3.5%)

    
  1. The species composition of cyanobacterial species, indicated as percentage, was determined by morphological identification (Mioni et al. 2012).
  2. Abbreviations: APHN Aphanizomenon spp.: DLCH Dolichospermum spp.: GLTR Gloeotrichia spp.: LMNR Limnoraphis spp.: MCRC-AE Microcystis aeruginosa: WRNC Woronichinia spp: ND not detected.
  3. aThe sampling month is shown in parenthesis in Sample ID.