Skip to main content

Table 2 Association between the -1327C>T hTERT genotype and the risk of overall malignancy in autopsy cases

From: hTERT promoter polymorphism, -1327C>T, is associated with the risk of epithelial cancer

 

Genotype distribution, n (%)

Risk for malignancya

Risk for multiple malignanciesb

 

Controlc

Single malignancy cases

Multiple malignancy cases

Crude OR (95% CI)

p-value

Adjusted ORd (95% CI)

p-value

Crude OR (95% CI)

p-value

Adjusted ORd (95% CI)

p-value

CC

245 (41.5)

308 (43.3)

130 (52.2)

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 

CT

272 (46.0)

324 (45.6)

100 (40.2)

0.87

0.22

0.86

0.22

0.69

0.021

0.68

0.024

    

(0.70 - 1.08)

 

(0.68 - 1.09)

 

(0.51 - 0.95)

 

(0.548- 0.95)

 

TT

74 (12.5)

79 (11.1)

19 (7.6)

0.74

0.085

0.68

0.041

0.48

0.0065

0.46

0.0046

    

(0.53 - 1.04)

 

(0.48 - 0.98)

 

(0.27 - 0.82)

 

(0.25 - 0.79)

 

Dominant model

CC

245 (41.5)

308 (43.3)

130 (52.2)

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 

CT + TT

346 (58.5)

403 (56.7)

119 (47.8)

0.84

0.11

0.82

0.087

0.65

0.0043

0.63

0.0040

    

(0.69 - 1.04)

 

(0.66 - 1.03)

 

(0.48 - 0.87)

 

(0.45 - 0.86)

 

Recessive model

CC + CT

517 (87.5)

632 (88.9)

230 (92.4)

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 

TT

74 (12.5)

79 (11.1)

19 (7.6)

0.79

0.16

0.73

0.080

0.58

0.033

0.55

0.024

    

(0.58 - 1.10)

 

(0.53 - 1.04)

 

(0.33 - 0.96)

 

(0.31 - 0.93)

 

Additive model e

   

0.86

0.063

0.70

0.036

0.69

0.0017

0.67

0.0014

    

(0.74 - 1.01)

 

(0.51 - 0.98)

 

(0.55 - 0.87)

 

(0.53 - 0.86)

 
  1. The risk of malignancy was estimated by calculating crude OR and OR adjusted for age, sex, smoking status and alcohol habit using a logistic regression model in autopsy cases (n = 1551). Significant associations highlighted in bold.
  2. OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval.
  3. aCases with at least one malignancy were compared with control.
  4. bCases with more than two malignancies were compared with control.
  5. cCases with no malignancy (n = 591).
  6. dCalculated for cases for whom smoking and drinking history was available (n = 1371).
  7. eApplied by including the number of T-alleles (0,1,2) as a continuous variable in the logistic regression model.