Skip to main content

Table 1 Pairwise comparison of DM-Scan estimates of percentage of density (PD) by the three raters

From: Validation of DM-Scan, a computer-assisted tool to assess mammographic density in full-field digital mammograms

  Rater 1 Rater 2
Difference Concordance correlation Difference Concordance correlation
Mean Mean
Coefficient Coefficient
(P05-P95)a (95% CI)b (P05-P95)a (95% CI)b
  PD (Rater1) - PD (Rater2)    
Rater 2 -1.6% 0.921   
(-10.2% to +6.6%) (0.910-0.933)   
PD (Rater1) – PD (Rater3)   PD (Rater2) – PD (Rater3)  
Rater 3 +0.3% 0.928 +1.9% 0.916
(-7.7% to +9.3%) (0.917-0.939) (-5.9% to 11.5%) (0.904-0.929)
  1. a 5th & 95th percentiles of the differences between PD estimated by these raters.
  2. b 95% Confidence Intervals.