Skip to main content
SpringerPlus

Table 1 Pairwise comparison of DM-Scan estimates of percentage of density (PD) by the three raters

From: Validation of DM-Scan, a computer-assisted tool to assess mammographic density in full-field digital mammograms

 

Rater 1

Rater 2

Difference

Concordance correlation

Difference

Concordance correlation

Mean

Mean

Coefficient

Coefficient

(P05-P95)a

(95% CI)b

(P05-P95)a

(95% CI)b

 

PD (Rater1) - PD (Rater2)

   

Rater 2

-1.6%

0.921

  

(-10.2% to +6.6%)

(0.910-0.933)

  

PD (Rater1) – PD (Rater3)

 

PD (Rater2) – PD (Rater3)

 

Rater 3

+0.3%

0.928

+1.9%

0.916

(-7.7% to +9.3%)

(0.917-0.939)

(-5.9% to 11.5%)

(0.904-0.929)

  1. a 5th & 95th percentiles of the differences between PD estimated by these raters.
  2. b 95% Confidence Intervals.
Back to article page