Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparative analysis of different ethanol processes with lignocellulosic/waste material

From: Design and optimization of ethanol production from bagasse pith hydrolysate by a thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces sp. IIPE453 using response surface methodology

Sl #

Lignocellulosic/waste raw material

Strain used

Temperature (°C)

pH

Sugar conc. (g/L)

Ethanol conc.(g/L)

Inoculum volume (%v/v)

Yield (% theoretical)

Productivity (g/L/h)

Reference

1

Bagasse pith hydrolysate

Kluyveromyces sp. IIPE453

45

4.5

40

17.40

5

88

0.36

this paper

2

Softwood

Pichiastipitis CBS6054: S. cerevisiae Y5

30

5.0

65

27.40

-

85.1

0.28

(Wan et al. 2012)

3

Kinnow waste and banana peels

Consortia of Pachysolentannophilus (MTCC 1077) and S. cerevisiae G

30

-

63

26.84

4:6

83.5

0.55

(Han et al. 2011)

4

Sugarcane bagasse

Kluyveromyces fragilis

35

5.5

180

32.60

-

36

0.45

(Sharma et al. 2007)

5

Korean food waste

S. cerevisiae 7904

35

5.4

75

24.17

2.5

63

0.60

(Sasikumar &Viruthagiri 2008)

6

Tapioca stem

Fusarium oxysporum

30

5.5

33

8.64

2

51.33

0.05

(Man et al. 2010)

7

Miscanthus biomass

S. cerevisae

32

-

140

59.20

7

83.92

1.23

(Magesh et al. 2011)