A teaching learning based optimization based on orthogonal design for solving global optimization problems

SpringerPlus

Table 10 Performance comparisons of OTLBO, CABC, GABC ,RABC and IABC

Function	FEs		CABC	GABC	RABC	IABC	OTLBO	Significant
Sphere	1.5× 10⁵	Mean	2.3e-40	3.6e-63	9.1e-61	5.34e-178	0	+
Sphere	1.5× 10⁵	Std	1.7e-40	5.7e-63	2.1e-60	0	0	+
Schwefel 2.22	2.0× 10⁵	Mean	3.5e-30	4.8e-45	3.2e-74	8.82e-127	0	+
Schwefel 2.22	2.0× 10⁵	Std	4.8e-30	1.4e-45	2.0e-73	3.49e-126	0	+
Schwefel 1.2	5.0× 10⁵	Mean	8.4e+02	4.3e+02	2.9e-24	1.78e-65	0	+
Schwefel 1.2	5.0× 10⁵	Std	9.1e+02	8.0e+02	1.5e-23	2.21e-65	0	+
Step	1.0× 10⁴	Mean	0	0	0	0	0	NA
Step	1.0× 10⁴	Std	0	0	0	0	0	NA
Rastrigin	5.0× 10⁴	Mean	1.3e-00	1.5e-10	2.3e-02	0	0	+
Rastrigin	5.0× 10⁴	Std	2.7e-00	2.7e-10	5.1e-01	0	0	+
Schwefel 2.21	5.0× 10⁵	Mean	6.1e-03	3.6e-06	2.8e-02	4.98e-38	0	+
Schwefel 2.21	5.0× 10⁵	Std	5.7e-03	7.6e-07	1.7e-02	8.59e-38	0	+
Ackley	5.0× 10⁴	Mean	1.0e-05	1.8e-09	9.6e-07	3.87e-14	2.7812e-15	+
Ackley	5.0× 10⁴	Std	2.4e-06	7.7e-10	8.3e-07	8.52e-15	1.5611e-15	+
Griewank	5.0× 10⁴	Mean	1.2e-04	6.0e-13	8.7e-08	0	0	+
		Std	4.6e-04	7.7e-13	2.1e-08	0	0