Skip to main content
SpringerPlus

Table 4 Results of repeated measures: type III tests of fixed effects relationships between expectations of OCB and seniority

From: Should more senior workers be better citizens? Expectations of helping and civic virtue related to seniority

 

Altruism

Courtesy

Civic virtue

B

df

t

η2e

B

df

t

η2d

B

df

t

η2f

Intercept

5.451 (.097)

888

56.170***

 

6.223 (.088)

922

70.416

 

6.363 (.098)

894

65.030

 

Senioritya

.212 (.050)

919

4.228***

.016

−.030 (.045)

933

−.667

0

.283 (.050)

924

5.262***

.032

Job positionb

.407 (.062)

919

4.996***

.023

.152 (.074)

933

2.063*

.005

.425 (.082)

924

5.184***

.027

Industryc

.136 (.067)

919

2.191*

.005

.060 (.056)

933

1.075

.001

.098 (.062)

924

1.567

.003

Countryd

−.687 (.081)

919

−10.226***

.098

.309 (.061)

933

5.092***

.027

.132 (.068)

924

1.994

.003

Adj. R 2 (R 2)

.132 (.135)

.037 (.041)

.070 (.074)

  1. N = 469. Unstandardized beta reported; SE reported in parenthesis
  2. *** p < .001; ** p < .01; * p < .05
  3. a 0 = junior, 1 = senior
  4. b 0 = non-supervisor, 1 = supervisor
  5. c 0 = manufacturing, 1 = service
  6. d 0 = South Korea, 1 = US
  7. e,d,f Classical eta squared, which is based on the form suggested by Richardson’s (2011: 142): SSeffect/SSTotal; however, the interpretation of effect size indices needs caution in that the effect size indices may be easily misinterpreted (Richardson 2011; Levine and Hullett 2002; Olejnik and Algina 2003)
Back to article page