We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact us so we can address the problem.

Syntheses, characterizations and thermal analyses of four novel unsymmetrical β-diketiminates

  • Siddappa A Patil1,
  • Phillip A Medina1,
  • Joseph W Ziller2 and
  • Bradley D Fahlman1Email author

DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-32

Received: 18 October 2012

Accepted: 17 December 2012

Published: 31 January 2013


Four novel unsymmetrical β-diketiminates 2-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)amino-4-(phenyl)imino-2-pentene (4a), 2-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)amino-4-(4-methylphenyl)imino-2-pentene (4b), 2-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)amino-4-(4-methoxyphenyl)imino-2-pentene (4c) and 2-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)amino-4-(4-chlorophenyl)imino-2-pentene (4d) were synthesized with a 77-84% yield, and were characterized by spectroscopic methods (1H NMR, 13C NMR, IR and mass spectrometry), elemental analysis, and X-ray single-crystal diffraction, respectively. Spectroscopic and X-ray single-crystal diffraction analyses determined the structures of the four β-diketiminates. While thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed two distinct endothermic peaks for each β-diketiminate at temperatures of 92.55°C and 221.50°C (4a), 93.51°C and 238.82°C (4b), 109.60°C and 329.22°C (4c), 115.43°C and 243.25°C (4d), respectively, corresponding to their melting and boiling points.


Unsymmetrical β-diketiminate Synthesis Spectroscopic investigation X-ray structure Thermogravimetric analysis


The β-diketiminate class, generally denoted as “nacnac”, or [{ArNC(R)}2CH]- (where Ar =aryl and R = Me or another group), occupies a rightful place alongside a narrow list of popular ancillary supports, given its ability to stabilize or generate unique coordination environments and to support reactive organometallic reagents or catalysts (Bourget-Merle et al. 2002; Holland 2008; Mindiola 2006; Cramer and Tolman 2007; Roesky et al. 2004; Piers and Emslie 2002; Rahim et al. 1998). The “nacnac” ligand skeleton is analogous to the “acac” (acetylacetonate) ligand, but the oxygen atoms are exchanged for nitrogen-based moieties such as NR (R = alkyl, silyl, Ar) (Scheme 1). As a result, the substituent at the nitrogen donor atom can allow for steric protection at the metal center unlike “acac” could offer. When small moieties such as H, Me, or the SiMe3 on the nitrogen the substance easily forms dimers and allows higher coordination to the metal center, whereas bulky aryl groups on nitrogen usually lead to the isolation of monomeric species with low coordination numbers at the metal.
Scheme 1

Schematic diagram of (a) “acac”, (b) “nacnac”, and (c) “cyclopentadienyl” ligands.

The first documented cases of β-diketiminate metal complexes were reported by McGeachin (McGeachin 1968), Parks, and Holm (Parks, and Holm 1968) in 1968. The explosion in popularity of “nacnac” amongst synthetic chemists is driven, in part, by the monoanionic nature of the β-diketiminate group, the chelating nature but also variable mode of hapticity, the ease in preparation, and the versatility to tune both electronic and steric parameters. Till to date the N-aryl substituted “nacnac” ligands [HN(Ar)C(Me)CHC(Me)N(Ar)] (Nagendran and Roesky 2008) and [HN(Ar)C(t Bu)CHC(t Bu)N(Ar)] (Pfirrmann et al. 2009; Ding et al. 2009) (Ar = 2,6-i Pr2C6H3) showed to be the best for stabilization of low coordinate metal sites.

The major breakthrough in this area was achieved in the mid 1990’s, when β-diketiminates were used as spectator ligands, thus offering strong metal-ligand bonds like cyclopentadienyls (Scheme 1). In contrast to the latter, β-diketiminates offer a possibility of subtle tuning of their electronic and steric properties by simple variation of the substituents on nitrogen and adjacent carbon atoms.

The availability of straightforward, multigram syntheses for many classes of β-diketiminates has generated widespread popularity of the ligand for coordination and organometallic chemistry. Prototypical symmetrical β-diketimines with N-aryl substituents can be synthesized in one step from commercially available anilines and diones through simple condensation reactions (McGeachin 1968; Stender et al. 2001). β-Diketiminates with aliphatic nitrogen substituents can also be prepared by related condensation routes, but often require harsh reagents such as oxonium salts for complete diimine formation (Kuhn et al. 1999). Other variants of the β-diketiminate scaffold have been recently discussed in a comprehensive review (Bourget-Merle et al. 2002). Herein, we demonstrate a synthetic pathway for unsymmetrical β-diketimines and provide detailed characterization by spectroscopic (1H NMR, 13C NMR and mass) methods, melting point determination, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential temperature analysis (DTA), and elemental analysis. In addition, the solid state structures of the compounds 4a-d have been analyzed by single crystal X-ray diffraction.

Results and discussion


The synthetic pathway for unsymmetrical β-diketiminates described in this work is outlined in Scheme 2. As depicted in Scheme 2, the unsymmetrical β-diketimines 4a-d were synthesized in two steps: (1) condensation of acetylacetone with one equiv. of primary aromatic amine 2,6-diisopropylaniline in methanol, with formic acid as catalyst, afforded the (Z)-4-(2,6-diisopropylphenylamino)pent-3-en-2-one intermediate 3; (2) another equiv. of the other aromatic amine (aniline, 4-methylaniline, 4-methoxyaniline, and 4-chlororlaniline) was pre-treated with para-toluenesulfonic acid in a 1 : 1 ratio for 3 h to afford para-toluenesulfonate, which was then reacted with the (Z)-4-(2,6-diisopropylphenylamino)pent-3-en-2-one intermediate 3 to give unsymmetrical β-diketimines 4a-d in good yields. In the second step, the one-pot reaction of (Z)-4-(2,6-diisopropylphenylamino)pent-3-en-2-one 3, aromatic amine and para-toluenesulfonic acid failed to give any target product; the reaction of (Z)-4-(2,6-diisopropylphenylamino)pent-3-en-2-one with the para-toluenesulfonic acid took place instead, preventing further reaction with the aromatic amine.
Scheme 2

General reaction scheme for the synthesis of unsymmetrical β-diketiminates 4a-d.

1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra

The 1H NMR spectra of all the unsymmetrical β-diketimines show a characteristic downfield shift in the range δ = 12.87-13.14 ppm for the NH proton and high field shift in the range δ = 4.79-4.84 ppm for the methyne proton attributable to the formation of unsymmetrical β-diketimines from (Z)-4-(2,6-diisopropylphenylamino)pent-3-en-2-one and amines. Two sharp singlets observed at the range 1.69-1.83 and 1.56-1.65 ppm are assigned to the protons of the two methyl groups (CH3C=NAr and CH3CNHAr) of the unsymmetrical β-diketiminates. The resonance due to the four CH3 protons (CH(CH3)2) were observed as a two doublets at the range 1.15-1.19 and 1.09-1.14 ppm while that of CH appeared as a septet at the range 3.12-3.18 ppm.

The 13C NMR is in good agreement with the proposed unsymmetrical β-diketiminate structures as well. The 13C-NMR spectra of unsymmetrical β-diketiminates showed a peak at the range 161.8-164.1 ppm which is assigned to carbon of the C=N group. The methyne carbon appears at the range 95.9-96.6 ppm. Four peaks at the range 24.3-28.7, 20.3-20.6, 21–22.8 and 20.7-21.2 ppm are due to carbons of the six methyl groups (CH3C=NAr, CH3CNHAr and CH(CH3)2) respectively. In addition, their identities have also been confirmed by a molecular ion peak [M+] from GC-MS mass spectra.

FT-IR spectra

The FT-IR spectra for the compounds 4a-d are recorded in the solid state using the KBr disc technique at the region from 400 to 4000 cm-1. The (C=N) bands are observed at 1645–1557 (ν) cm-1; the position of these bands varies with the molecular structure, though no regularity can be pointed out. The bands at the range 3055–3072 (ν) cm-1 is typical of the NH group. Weak to medium absorptions around 3100–3000 cm-1 observed corresponding to the =C–H stretch of aromatic ring.

X-ray crystal structure

Single crystals of unsymmetrical β-diketiminates 4a-d were grown by the slow evaporation method using methanol as the solvent at room temperature. The solid state structures of 4a-d with an atom-numbering scheme are shown in Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. The molecular packing diagrams of 4a-d are displaced in Figures 5, 6, 7 and 8, respectively. A crystallographic data and refinement detail of the compounds 4a-d is shown in Table 1, whereas selected bond lengths and bond angles are compiled in Table 2. The analysis of the crystal structures of compounds 4a-d shows that they are coplanar. Compounds 4a-d have two aromatic rings and a central linkage. Compounds 4a-d crystallized in the triclinic space group P 1 ¯ , with two molecules in the unit cell. In these compounds, there is an absence of any lattice held water molecules or organic solvent molecules in the unit cell of the determined structure. The N=C-C=C-NH linkage of the compounds 4a-d is planar; the bond lengths [Table 2] indicate electron delocalization. The C-C bond distances in aromatic rings are in the normal range of 1.37-1.48 A°, which is characteristic of delocalized aromatic rings. The C-C-C bond angles in aromatic rings are around 120° with the variation being less than 2°, which is characteristic of sp2-hybridized carbons. The molecular packing diagrams of all the four unsymmetrical β-diketiminates 4a-d showed two layers of molecules, which are independently arranged in the unit cell. Molecules forming each layer are not connected through intermolecular hydrogen bonding. In each layer, the molecules are alternatively parallel. The molecular packing diagram also shows the presence of one intra-molecular hydrogen bond. One of the hydrogens, H1 of the NH group, is involved in intra-molecular hydrogen bonding with the N2 of the C=N entity. This hydrogen bonding stabilizes the crystal packing.
Figure 1

X-ray diffraction structure of 4a; molecule; thermal ellipsoids are drawn on the 50% probability level.

Figure 2

X-ray diffraction structure of 4b; molecule; thermal ellipsoids are drawn on the 50% probability level.

Figure 3

X-ray diffraction structure of 4c; molecule; thermal ellipsoids are drawn on the 50% probability level.

Figure 4

X-ray diffraction structure of 4d; molecule; thermal ellipsoids are drawn on the 50% probability level.

Figure 5

Perspective view of the molecular packing of 4a showing the intramolecular hydrogen bondings.

Figure 6

Perspective view of the molecular packing of 4b showing the intramolecular hydrogen bondings.

Figure 7

Perspective view of the molecular packing of 4c showing the intramolecular hydrogen bondings.

Figure 8

Perspective view of the molecular packing of 4d showing the intramolecular hydrogen bondings.

Table 1

Crystal data and the structure refinement of the compounds 4a-d

Identification code





Empirical formula

C23 H30 N2

C24 H32 N2

C24 H32 N2 O

C23 H29 Cl N2

Formula weight





Temperature (K)





Wavelength (Å)





Crystal system





Space group

P 1 ¯

P 1 ¯

P 1 ¯

P 1 ¯

Unit cell dimensions


a (Å)





b (Å)





c (Å)





α (o)





β (o)





γ (o)





Volume (Å3)










Density (calculated) (Mg/m3)





Absorption coefficient (mm-1)










Crystal size (mm3)

0.42 x 0.33 x 0.26

0.33 x 0.31 x 0.25

0.36 x 0.36 x 0.23

0.38 x 0.37 x 0.26

Theta range for data collection (o)

2.04 to 26.37

1.80 to 28.40

1.78 to 28.82

1.81 to 28.54

Index ranges

−12 ≤ h ≤ 12, -13 ≤ k ≤ 13, -13 ≤ l ≤ 13

12 ≤ h ≤ 11, -13 ≤ k ≤ 13, -15 ≤ l ≤ 15

−12 ≤ h ≤ 12, -13 ≤ k ≤ 13, -15 ≤ l ≤ 16

−11 ≤ h ≤ 11, -13 ≤ k ≤ 13, -15 ≤ l ≤ 15

Reflections collected





Independent reflections

4202 [R(int) = 0.0142]

4779 [R(int) = 0.0145]

5172 [R(int) = 0.0138]

4753 [R(int) = 0.0172]

Refinement method

Full-matrix least-squares on F2

Full-matrix least-squares on F2

Full-matrix least-squares on F2

Full-matrix least-squares on F2

Completeness to theta = 25.50°





Max. and min. Transmission

0.9842 and 0.9742

0.9842 and 0.9794

0.9846 and 0.9760

0.9522 and 0.9295

Data / restraints / parameters

4202 / 0 / 251

4779 / 0 / 277

5172 / 0 / 255

4753 / 0 / 348

Goodness-of-fit on F2





Final R indices [I>2sigma(I)]

R1 = 0.0436, wR2 = 0.1186

R1 = 0.0438, wR2 = 0.1149

R1 = 0.0407, wR2 = 0.1089

R1 = 0.0366, wR2 = 0.0996

R indices (all data)

R1 = 0.0505, wR2 = 0.1248

R1 = 0.0535, wR2 = 0.1225

R1 = 0.0452, wR2 = 0.1126

R1 = 0.0406, wR2 = 0.1031

Largest diff. peak and hole (e.Å-3)

0.264 and −0.197

0.264 and −0.201

0.328 and −0.325

0.328 and −0.225

Table 2

Selected bond lengths and bonds angles of the compounds 4a-d

Bond length (Å)
































































Bond angles (°)


























































Mass spectra and thermal studies

The mass spectra were analyzed by GC-MS. The peaks observed at m/z 334.49, 348.47, 364.36, and 368.92 suggested the molecular formulas C23H30N2, C24H32N2, C24H32N2O, and C23H29ClN2 of the compounds 4a-d respectively.

The thermal behavior of the compounds 4a-d have been investigated using thermogravimetric techniques in the temperature range from 25°C to 1000°C at a heating rate of 10°C min-1 under inert nitrogen gas flow. On the temperature difference curves seen in Figure 9, sharp endothermic peaks were observed at temperatures of 92.55, 93.51, 109.60 and 115.43°C, this indicates that the compounds 4a-d melt at 92.55, 93.51, 109.60 and 115.43°C, respectively. Further confirmation of their melting point by glass capillary analysis provided values of 93.0, 94.0, 110.0 and 116.0°C for the compounds 4a-d. The symmetric analogues 2-((phenyl)amino)-4-((phenyl)imino)-2-pentene, 2-((4-methylphenyl)amino)-4-((4-methylphenyl)imino)-2-pentene, 2-((4-methoxyphenyl)amino)-4-((4-methoxyphenyl)imino)-2-pentene and 2-((4-chlorophenyl)amino)-4-((4-chlorophenyl)imino)-2-pentene melt at 51, 73, 94 and 86°C, respectively (Gong and Ma 2008 ; Tang et al. 2006). At temperatures of 221.50, 238.82, 329.22 and 243.25°C, additional sharp endothermic peaks occurred corresponding to boiling points of the compounds 4a-d. Onsets of mass loss in the compounds 4a-d occurred at 77.17, 85.29, 91.38 and 93.41°C and terminated at 243.66, 258.89, 329.95 and 260.92°C as observed by the weight loss curve of the TGA data for each compound.
Figure 9

TGA/DTA of unsymmetrical β-diketiminates 4a-d.


All the four unsymmetrical β-diketiminates (4a-d) were synthesized. The structures were identified by spectroscopic methods (1H NMR, 13C NMR, IR and mass), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential temperature analysis (DTA), elemental analysis, and X-ray diffraction analyses. TGA/DTA analyses of all the four unsymmetrical β-diketiminates 4a-d were studied, showing two distinct endothermic peaks at temperatures of 92.55, 93.51, 109.60, 115.43°C and 221.50, 238.82, 329.22, 243.25°C, corresponding to melting and boiling points, respectively.

Experimental section

General information on reagents and techniques

Reactions were carried out under aerobic conditions. All reagents and solvents are of analytical grade; they were purchased and used without further purification. Acetylacetone, aniline, 4-methylaniline, 4-methoxyaniline, 4-chlororlaniline, formic acid, para-toluenesulfoinc acid monohydrate, MgSO4, and sodium carbonate were procured commercially from Sigma-Aldrich chemical company, and were used without further purification. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were obtained using a 1.0% to 2.5% solution in deuterated benzene (C6D6). 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercury 500 MHz spectrometer. Proton and carbon chemical shifts are reported in parts-per-million (δ) with respect to tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal reference (δ = 0.0 ppm). IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer Paragon 1000 FT-IR spectrometer employing a KBr disc. Mass spectra were obtained on a GC-MS instrument operating in TOF-MI+ mode. CHN analysis was done by Atlantic Microlab using a CE-1108 Elemental Analyzer, and values were within ±0.4% of the theoretical values. Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were made with a Pyris TGA instrument. A heating rate of 100C/min was used and samples (5–10 mg) were contained in a platinum pan. The sample compartment was purged with dry nitrogen at 50 mL/min during analysis. TA Thermal Advantage software was used for data analysis. Melting points were determined using a Pyris differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). The crystallographic data for compounds 4a-d were collected on a Bruker SMART APEX II diffractometer. The APEX2 (Version 2010.9–0, 2010) program package was used to determine the unit-cell parameters and for data collection. The raw frame data was processed using SAINT (Version and 7.68a, 2009) and SADABS Sheldrick (2008a) to yield the reflection data file. Subsequent calculations were carried out using the SHELXTL (Sheldrick 2008b) program. The structures were solved by direct methods and refined on F2 by full-matrix least-squares techniques. The analytical scattering factors21 for neutral atoms were used throughout the analysis. Hydrogen atoms were included using a riding model.

Crystallographic data for the structures reported in this article have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center with the deposition numbers 903786, 903787, 903788, and 903789. A copy of the data can be obtained free of charge from the Director, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK [fax: +44 1223 336–033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk or http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk].

4-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)amino-3-penten-2-one (3). 2,6-Diisopropylaniline (1.77 g, 10.0 mmol) was mixed with acetylacetone (1.0 g, 10.0 mmol) in 40 mL of methanol containing a catalytic amount (2 drops) of formic acid. The solution was heated at 85°C for 6–8 h. Removal of volatiles afforded a pale brown oil. This was then stirred with 20 mL 40 60°C petroleum ether at −30°C to precipitate a white solid which was filtered off, washed with 2 x 10 mL cold hexane (−78°C), and dried in vacuo. Yield: 2.30 g (89%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6) δ (ppm): 12.66 (1H, s, NH), 7.11-7.06 (m, 1H, ArH), 6.97-6.94 (m, 2H, ArH), 5.08 (s, 1H, CH=C(CH3)N), 3.04 (sept, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, CH(CH3)2), 2.01 (s, 3H, CH3COC), 1.34 (s, 3H, CH3CNHAr), 1.02 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H, CH(CH3)2), 0.96 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H, CH(CH3)2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6) δ (ppm): 195.69 (C=O), 162.40 (HC(CNHAr), 146.60 (Ar-C), 134.23 (Ar-C), 128.50 (Ar-C), 123.78 (Ar-C), 95.93 (CH), 29.04 (CH3C=O), 28.80 (CH(CH3)2), 24.53 (CH(CH3)2, 22.61 (CH(CH3)2), 18.85 (CH3CNHAr). Mass data (TOF MS EI+): Calcd for C17H25NO [M+] 259.39, found: 259.21. Anal. Calcd for C17H25NO: C, 78.72; H, 9.71; N, 5.40; Found: C, 78.61; H, 9.59; N, 5.36. IR (KBr, cm-1) ν: 3418 (m), 2972 (w), 16015 (s), 1573 (m), 1515 (m), 1467 (w), 1411 (m), 1397 (m), 1344 (m), 1299 (w), 1203 (w), 1137 (m), 1076 (w), 983 (m), 842 (w), 722 (w), 601 (m), 513 (m), 484 (w).

2-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)amino-4-(phenyl)imino-2-pentene (4a). Aniline (4.55 g, 50.00 mmol), and para-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (9.510 g, 50.00 mmol) in 100 mL of toluene were stirred for approximately 3 h at room temperature. To the obtained yellow suspension, 4-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)amino-3-penten-2-one (12.97 g, 50.00 mmol) was added. A Dean-Stark apparatus was attached and the mixture was heated at reflux for 24 h to remove the water. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and all the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure to give a yellow solid. The solid was treated with diethyl ether (100 mL), water (100 mL) and sodium carbonate (10.60 g, 100 mmol), and the obtained mixture was kept stirring. After complete dissolution, the aqueous phase was separated and extracted with diethyl ether. The combined organic phase was dried over MgSO4 and rotary evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure to afford a brownish yellow solid. Yellow crystals (12.95 g, 77%) were obtained after recrystallization from methanol. 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6) δ (ppm): 13.14 (s, 1H, NH), 7.16-7.14 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.10-7.09 (m, 2H, ArH), 6.97-6.94 (m, 2H, ArH), 6.88-6.85 (m, 1H, ArH), 4.84 (s, 1H, CH=C(CH3)N), 3.18 (sept, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, CH(CH3)2), 1.82 (s, 3H, CH3C=NAr), 1.63 (s, 3H, CH3CNHAr), 1.19 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H, CH(CH3)2), 1.14 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H, CH(CH3)2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6) δ (ppm): 163.1 (NCCH3), 157.3 (NCCH3), 144.9 (Ar-C), 142.8 (Ar-C), 141.1 (Ar-C), 129.2 (Ar-C), 125.2 (Ar-C), 123.4 (Ar-C), 123.3 (Ar-C), 122.7 (Ar-C), 96.6 (CH), 28.7 (CH3C=NAr), 24.3 (CH(CH3)2), 22.7 (CH(CH3)2), 21.0 (CH(CH3)2), 20.6 (CH3CNHAr). Melting point: 93.0°C. Mass data (TOF MS EI+): Calcd for C23H30N2 [M+] 334.50, found: 334.49. Anal. Calcd for C23H30N2: C, 82.59; H, 9.04; N, 8.37; Found: C, 82.55; H, 9.01; N, 8.41. IR (KBr, cm-1) ν: 3055 (w), 2960 (w), 2920 (w), 2875 (w), 1925 (w), 1873 (w), 1800 (w),1740 (w), 1630 (s), 1547 (s), 1489 (w), 1360 (m), 1275 (m), 1260 (m), 1155 (s), 1100 (w), 1030 (w), 800 (s), 798 (s), 750 (s), 699 (m), 595 (w), 501 (w), 425 (m).

2-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)amino-4-(4-methylphenyl)imino-2-pentene (4b). β-Diketiminate 4b was synthesized by the same procedure as 4a. Yield (14.02 g, 80%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6) δ (ppm): 13.11 (s, 1H, NH), 7.13-7.11 (m, 3H, ArH), 6.89-6.85 (m, 4H, ArH), 4.83 (s, 1H, CH=C(CH3)N), 3.16 (sept, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, CH(CH3)2), 2.05 (s, 3H, CH3),1.83 (s, 3H, CH3C=NAr), 1.63 (s, 3H, CH3CNHAr), 1.17 (d, 6H, J = 7.0 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.13 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H, CH(CH3)2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6) δ (ppm): 163.8 (NCCH3), 156.6 (NCCH3), 143.7 (Ar-C), 141.6 (Ar-C), 140.5 (Ar-C), 132.8 (Ar-C), 129.8 (Ar-C), 124.8 (Ar-C), 123.4 (Ar-C), 123.1 (Ar-C), 96.4 (CH), 28.7 (CH3Ar), 24.3 (CH3C=NAr), 22.7 (CH(CH3)2), 21.1 (CH(CH3)2), 20.7 (CH(CH3)2), 20.5 (CH3CNHAr). Melting point: 94.0°C Mass data (TOF MS EI+): Calcd for C24H32N2 [M+] 348.52, found: 348.47. Anal. Calcd for C24H32N2: C, 82.71; H, 9.25; N, 8.04; Found: C, 82.69; H, 9.17; N, 8.03. IR (KBr, cm-1) ν: 3149 (w), 3072 (w), 3015 (w), 2960 (m), 1635 (w), 1598 (s), 1542 (m), 1468 (m), 1439 (m), 1388 (w), 1255 (m), 1236 (s), 1180 (w), 1120 (m), 1105 (m), 1037 (m), 760 (m), 741(m), 664 (w), 615 (w), 602 (w), 557 (w).

2-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)amino-4-(4-methoxyphenyl)imino-2-pentene (4c). β-Diketiminate 4c was synthesized by the same procedure as 4a. Yield (15.25 g, 84%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6) δ (ppm): 13.04 (s, 1H, NH), 7.14-7.11 (m, 3H, ArH), 6.87-6.84 (m, 2H, ArH), 6.65-6.63 (m, 2H, ArH), 4.84 (s, 1H, CH=C(CH3)N), 3.26 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.17 (sept, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, CH(CH3)2), 1.81 (s, 3H, CH3C=NAr), 1.65 (s, 3H, CH3CNHAr), 1.19 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H, CH(CH3)2), 1.14 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H, CH(CH3)2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6) δ (ppm): 164.1 (NCCH3), 156.8 (NCCH3), 156.6 (Ar-C), 144.2 (Ar-C), 140.2 (Ar-C), 136.6 (Ar-C), 125.0 (Ar-C), 124.6 (Ar-C), 123.4 (Ar-C), 114.5 (Ar-C), 95.9 (CH), 54.9 (OCH3Ar), 28.7 (CH3C=NAr), 24.2 (CH(CH3)2), 22.8 (CH(CH3)2), 21.2 (CH(CH3)2), 20.3 (CH3CNHAr). Melting point: 110.0°C. Mass data (TOF MS EI+): Calcd for C24H32N2O [M+] 364.52, found: 364.36. Anal. Calcd for C24H32N2O: C, 79.08; H, 8.85; N, 7.68; Found: C, 79.10; H, 8.72; N, 7.57. IR (KBr, cm-1) ν: 3057 (m), 2971 (m), 2925 (w), 2878 (m), 2832 (w), 1631 (m), 1548 (m), 1520 (s), 1472 (s), 1400 (s), 1320 (m), 1289 (m), 1260 (w), 1251 (m), 1233 (w), 1169 (m), 1115 (m), 930 (w), 795 (m), 759 (m), 753 (w), 740 (m), 679 (w), 641 (w), 597 (m), 578 (w), 415 (m).

2-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)amino-4-(4-methoxyphenyl)imino-2-pentene (4c). β-Diketiminate 4d was synthesized by the same procedure as 4a. Yield (15.10 g, 82%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6) δ (ppm): 12.87 (s, 1H, NH), 7.14-7.08 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.00-6.98 (m, 2H, ArH), 6.63-6.60 (m, 2H, ArH), 4.79 (s, 1H, CH=C(CH3)N), 3.12 (sept, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, CH(CH3)2), 1.69 (s, 3H, CH3C=NAr), 1.56 (s, 3H, CH3CNHAr), 1.15 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H, CH(CH3)2), 1.09 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H, CH(CH3)2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6) δ (ppm): 161.8 (NCCH3), 159.2 (NCCH3), 144.9 (Ar-C), 142.2 (Ar-C), 141.0 (Ar-C), 129.2 (Ar-C), 128.3 (Ar-C), 125.9 (Ar-C), 123.6 (Ar-C), 123.5 (Ar-C), 96.6 (CH), 28.7 (CH3C=NAr), 24.4 (CH(CH3)2), 22.7 (CH(CH3)2), 20.7 (CH(CH3)2), 20.6 (CH3CNHAr). Melting point: 116.0°C. Mass data (TOF MS EI+): Calcd for C23H29ClN2 [M+] 368.94, found: 368.92. Anal. Calcd for C23H29ClN2: C, 74.88; H, 7.92; Cl, 9.61; N, 7.59; Found: C, 74.89; H, 7.90; Cl, 9.58; N, 7.55. IR (KBr, cm-1) ν: 3062 (s), 2960 (m), 1670 (s), 1558 (m), 1530 (w), 1495 (m), 1450 (m), 1417 (s), 1325 (m), 1271 (w), 1239 (m), 1215 (w), 1182 (m), 1120 (m), 1051 (m), 1030 (m), 930 (w), 864 (m), 837 (w), 800 (w), 745 (m), 677 (w), 635 (w).



We gratefully acknowledge funding for this work from the National Science Foundation (CHE-0911061).

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Chemistry & Science of Advanced Materials Program, Central Michigan University
Department of Chemistry, University of California


  1. APEX2 Version 2010.9-0. Madison, WI: Bruker AXS, Inc; 2010.
  2. Bourget-Merle L, Lappert MF, Severn JR: The chemistry of β-diketiminatometal complexes. Chem Rev 2002, 102: 3031-3066. 10.1021/cr010424rView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cramer CJ, Tolman WB: Mononuclear Cu–O2 complexes: geometries, spectroscopic properties, electronic structures, and reactivity. Acc Chem Res 2007, 40: 601-608. 10.1021/ar700008cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ding K, Pierpont AW, Brennessel WW, Lukat-Rodgers G, Rodgers KR, Cundari TR, Bill E, Holland PL: Cobalt-dinitrogen complexes with weakened N-N bonds. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131: 9471-9472. 10.1021/ja808783uView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Gong S, Ma H: (2008) β-Diketiminate aluminium complexes: synthesis, characterization and ring-opening polymerization of cyclic esters. Dalton Trans 2008, 0: 3345-3357.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Holland PL: Electronic structure and reactivity of three-coordinate iron complexes. Acc Chem Res 2008, 41: 905-914. 10.1021/ar700267bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kuhn N, Fahl J, Fuchs S, Steimann M, Henkel G, Maulitz AHZ: Vinamidin-chelate des aluminiums und Ggalliums. Z Anorg Allg Chem 1999, 625(12):2108-2114. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3749(199912)625:12<2108::AID-ZAAC2108>3.0.CO;2-KView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. McGeachin SG: Synthesis and properties of some β-diketimines derived from acetylacetone, and their metal complexes. Can J Chem 1968, 46: 1903-1912. 10.1139/v68-315View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Mindiola DJ: Oxidatively induced abstraction reactions. A synthetic approach to low-coordinate and reactive early transition metal complexes containing metal-ligand multiple bonds. Acc Chem Res 2006, 39: 813-821. 10.1021/ar0500113View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Nagendran S, Roesky HW: The Chemistry of aluminum(I), silicon(II), and germanium(II). Organometallics 2008, 27: 457-492. 10.1021/om7007869View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Parks JE, Holm RH: Synthesis, solution stereochemistry, and electron delocalization properties of bis(.beta.-iminoamino)nickel(II) complexes. Inorg Chem 1968, 7: 1408-1416. 10.1021/ic50065a029View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Pfirrmann S, Limberg C, Herwig C, Stöβer R, Ziemer B: A Dinuclear nickel(I) dinitrogen complex and its reduction in single-electron steps. Angew Chem Int Ed 2009, 48: 3357-3361. 10.1002/anie.200805862View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Piers WE, Emslie DJH: Non-cyclopentadienyl ancillaries in organogroup 3 metal chemistry: a fine balance in ligand design. Coord Chem Rev 2002, 233–234: 131-155.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Rahim M, Taylor NJ, Xin S, Collins S: Synthesis and structure of acyclic bis(ketenimine) complexes of zirconium. Organometallics 1998, 17: 1315-1323. 10.1021/om970862hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Roesky HW, Singh S, Jancik V, Chandrasekhar V: A Paradigm change in assembling OH functionalities on metal centers. Acc Chem Res 2004, 37: 969-981. 10.1021/ar0402154View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. SAINT Version 7.68a. Madison, WI: Bruker AXS; 2009.
  17. Sheldrick GM: SADABS, Version 2008/1. Inc, Madison, WI: Bruker AXS; 2008.Google Scholar
  18. Sheldrick GM: SHELXTL, Version 2008/4. Inc, Madison, WI: Bruker AXS; 2008.Google Scholar
  19. Stender M, Wright RJ, Eichler BE, Prust J, Olmstead MM, Roesky HW, Power PP: The synthesis and structure of lithium derivatives of the sterically encumbered β-diketiminate ligand [{(2,6-Pri 2H3C6)N(CH3)C}2CH], and a modified synthesis of the aminoimine precursor. Dalton Trans 2001, 0: 3465-3469.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Tang LM, Duan YQ, Li XF, Li YS: Syntheses, structure and ethylene polymerization behaviour of β-diiminato titanium complexes. J Organomet Chem 2006, 691: 2023-2030. 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2005.12.053View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Patil et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.