Table 3 Comparison of yield components in F 1 hybrid (Wuhan, 2012)
F1hybrid | PH (cm) | CP | SC | 1000-seed weight (g) | Seed yield (kg·ha-1) | % yield increase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D248A×Zhu08J3 | 175.8±4.5 | 160.9±6.2 | 73.9±1.3 | 3.60±0.08 | 1952.5±155.2a | 142.4 |
D248A×98-4155 | 165.2±5.3 | 152.4±4.5 | 74.6±2.1 | 3.45±0.11 | 1863.2±123.5a | 131.3 |
D248A×Hangzhi 2 | 184.6±5.9 | 142.7±4.8 | 75.4±1.9 | 3.59±0.07 | 1783.7±89.9a | 121.5 |
D248A×98-6204 | 163.0±7.4 | 129.6±3.6 | 76.5±3.4 | 3.14±0.13 | 1180.8±190.7b | 46.6 |
95 ms-5A×Zhongzhi 18 | 172.9±5.6 | 127.6±2.8 | 67.7±2.1 | 3.29±0.13 | 1170.0±140.1b | 45.3 |
95 ms-5×01-2658 | 125.2±3.8 | 113.8±3.4 | 73.4±2.8 | 3.11±0.21 | 941.5±40.5c | 16.9 |
Zhongzhi 14 (CK) | 135.2±3.9 | 120.1±3.9 | 69.0±1.5 | 3.47±0.17 | 805.3±59.6 cd | 0.0 |
95 ms-5×Zhongzhi 11 | 116.2±3.1 | 98.4±2.7 | 67.5±2.5 | 3.30±0.21 | 716.7±67.6d | −11.0 |
95 ms-5×98-6204 | 122.4±2.8 | 81.3±2.3 | 66.7±1.4 | 3.50±0.18 | 712.4±88.7d | −11.5 |