Zoning for management in wetland nature reserves: a case study using Wuliangsuhai Nature Reserve, China
© Zeng et al.; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 4 July 2012
Accepted: 21 September 2012
Published: 2 October 2012
Zoning is a fundamental tool for the effective management of nature reserves. A three-zone model (core zone, buffer zone, and experimental zone) has been applied to nature reserves in China since 1980s; however, this model appears not fit for all types of nature reserves, especially wetlands.
Wuliangsuhai is such a typical wetland reserve, which can represent most of the other wetland reserves in China, for both its human utilization, and for its function as the bird habitat. The “Component-Process-Service” (CPS) framework of the Convention on Wetlands allows a determination of the “ecological character” of the wetland and also allows identification of potential threats, providing thus a perspective for management opportunities and challenges.
Discussion and evaluation
Applying the CPS framework to Wuliangsuhai wetland nature reserve, we have had a better understanding of the ecosystem services and its relationship with the ecological process and components of the wetland. A comparison of effectiveness in maintaining ecosystem services by the two zoning models (the existing three-zone model, and the new zoning model) was made.
The study suggested introducing an additional risk-control zone to be more effective in managing and alleviating threats to the ecological character than the standard 3-zone system. Furthermore, a “dynamic” zoning that takes into account the annual variation in habitat and avifauna distribution, as an elaboration of the Four-zone structure, may achieve the desired conservation objectives in an even more effective manner. The proposed zonation structure has the added benefit of promoting harmonization between nature conservation and local sustainable development.
KeywordsWetland Management Nature reserve Zonation Wuliangsuhai Water birds Ecological character Ramsar Convention
As a means of comparing climatic and altitudinal variation, as well as providing insights into temporal changes (such as succession), the study of ecosystem zonation has a long history. As a natural area management tool, however, zonation has a shorter history with its origins dating back to the 1930s. At that time, when the need for management of wild landscapes as protected areas was beginning to be understood, dividing their space into areas of different management activities and intensities became common practice. Shelford (1933) among others, proposed establishment of buffer zones to keep innermost cores of protected areas from human interference. It is since the 1960’s that zoning as a management tool has proceeded apace in the management of public land, fisheries, and especially marine, terrestrial and freshwater protected areas (Day 2002, Davos et al. 2007, Salomon et al. 1996). Well-designed and scientifically-based zonation can be indeed a useful and important way to allocate management effort and attention, define appropriate levels of enforcement, reconcile different users’ conflicts and establish appropriate monitoring protocols.
Perhaps the most widespread global standard for protected area zonation is that of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves (UNESCO 1970). Part of the acceptance process to be included in the World Network of Biosphere Reserves was the need to comply with a tripartite zonation: core area, buffer zone, and transition area. China has adopted a version of this 3-zone plan as an essential principle for design and management of not only its Biosphere Reserves but all its nature reserves. Current data show China has 2,541 nature reserves, covering almost 150 million ha, and representing 15.3% of land surface, of which wetland reserves (excluding coastal wetlands) accounted for 19% (MEPPRC 2010). Yet in the 30 years during which wetland reserves have been established in China, and despite advances in technology and methods of mapping and observation, the model and theory behind reserve zonation has remained unchanged - and unchallenged.
Unlike other ecosystems e.g. forests, dry grasslands, savannah forests, management challenges in wetland nature reserves arise from the use of the reserve by transitory species (e.g. migratory water birds), which suggested that a three-zone management scheme is not the most effective or efficient zonation framework. Among the reasons for lack of effectiveness are the highly dynamic characteristics of wetlands - including seasonal climatic and hydrological variation, against which inflexible conservation objectives and strategies provide problems, rather than solutions.
In this study, we applied the ecological character paradigm (Ramsar 2005) of the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar 1971) – hereafter Ramsar Convention - to understand the spatial and temporal nature of the wetland in the Wuliangsuhai Nature Reserve (hereafter WNR), China. We were not only mindful of the static ecological components such as vegetation distribution, habitat types, but also of ecological processes (birds migratory pattern, hydrology, etc.) and the delivery of welfare for local people (wetland ecosystem services), to get a refined zonation model as a compromise of conservation and development.
Before the establishment of the nature reserve, the lake had been heavily used as the fish farm by local communities. Their livelihoods had been depending on the revenue from fishery, and harvest of reeds that sell to nearby paper mill. Since the area been declared as the nature reserve, such activities should be regulated by law, however, due to lack of compensation mechanism, all these illegal activities continue, in addition, tourism has been developed in recent years. Thus, the conflict between conservation and maintaining livelihoods has been growing.
The WNR lies in the conjunction of the Central Asian Flyway and the East Asian-Australian Flyway and represents one of the most important breeding and stopover sites on these flyways (Boere & Stroud 2006). WNR has had 240 species of birds from 46 families and 17 orders recorded from its waters. Among those 240 species are 5 first class protected species and 29 second class protected species, according to Chinese Wildlife Conservation Legislation. Particularly important species include Ciconia nigra, Haliaeetus leucoryphys, Haliueetus albiilla, Otis tarda, Larus relictus, and, the most emblematic, Cygnus olor (Mute Swan).
The ecological character paradigm
The Ramsar Convention defines ecological character (prescribed by the Convention text in Article 3) and adopted in revised form by Decision IX.1A (Ramsar 2005) as:
"“… the combination of the ecological components, processes and ecosystem services that characterize the wetland.”"
Ecological components are further defined as the physical, chemical and biological (communities, habitats, species, genes) elements of a wetland ecosystem. Ecological Processes are the dynamic interactions within and between the biotic components, as well as between them and with the abiotic components. Ecosystem Services - usually grouped as provisioning, regulating, cultural and supporting (MA) - are provided by the wetland ecosystem through interactions between the components and dynamic ecological processes.
Vegetation and habitat distribution of key structural types was derived from an image-based survey using Alos Imagery data (2010-10-14) with 2.5 m resolution. Analysis of the image data using ArcGIS 9.3 and ENVI 4.7 produced area calculations.
For Bird species, we analysed, through a three-year (2009–2011) investigation from spring to winter - water bird population distribution and dynamics in the WNR. Plot count and the line transect methods were used. Each survey valign="top" consists of 2 plots and 5 transects sets and were conducted by a 3-member team. The plots and transects covered the three different habitats (open water, reed swamp, shoal) identified through the vegetation or habitat analysis described above. Bird counts were made using binoculars (8 × 42) and telescopes (20-60 × 85) in the morning (0800–1000) or in the evening (1500–1730), when foraging activity normally peaks (Ringelman & Flake, 1980).
Although we did not ourselves undertook hydrological studies and we used previous work (Li et al.2008) to gain an understanding of surface and sub-surface hydrology, and its likely impact on the biological and human variables we measured. To assist with an understanding of human use of the Lake, and the delivery of ecosystem services, socio-economic, and cultural data were collected through analysis of peer-reviewed and “grey” literature (Shang et al.2003, Xing and Yang1996). Socio-metric data were collected through interviews with differing groups of stakeholders, including the WNR administration, surrounding local communities, and people active in fisheries.
Evaluation and discussion
Vegetation & habitat
The land surrounding the WNR wetland consists mainly of lightly vegetated dunes, saline grass flats, farmland and recently planted woodland. Lake edges have extensive grassed areas; saline marshes develop where there is surface or near-surface water flow, and desert halophytes such as Suaeda glauca, Tamarix ramosissima, Achnatherum splendens. Kalidium cuspidatum, Nitraria tangutorum, are found on the drier edges of these marshes.
The plant communities of the wetland are simple in floristic and structure, being formed from a few highly dominant vascular plant species producing very high biomass yields. T he emergent reed swamp vegetation is dominated by 3-4 m high Phragmites australis (with 3-4m high Typha latifolia, and less frequently T. minima sometimes co-, or solely dominant).
List of macrophytes in Wuliangsuhai
1 Gramineae Poaceae
(1) Phragmites australis
(4) Potamogeton pectinatus
(5) Potamogeton malaianus
(2) Typha latifolia
(6) Potamogeton zosterifolius
(3) Typha minima
(7) Potamogeton crispus
(8) Potamogeton perfoliatus
(9) Najas spp.
(10) Myriophyllum spicatum
(11) Chara spp.
Bird population & migration pattern
Although not a major focus of this investigation, we noted vegetation communities surrounding the lake support viable populations of falcons, lapwings, turtledove and shrike.
In terms of habitat use by migratory birds, Phragmites swamps are good for foraging, nesting, moulting and sheltering, benthic vegetation is good for foraging, especially for ducks, swans and gulls, and the shoals are good for sheltering and roosting in storms or cold springs, for most species.
Hydrology & water quality
Hydrology is the main abiotic determinant of the structure and composition of aquatic plant communities. (Brock and Casanova 1997, Bunn and Arthington 2002, Casanova and Brock 2000). The WNR is an important part of Ho-t'ao Irrigation and Drainage system, and it not only retains water for irrigation, but also plays important role in mitigating flood, and helps reduce saline intrusion from the groundwater. Of the lake’s water input, 96% is from the overflow and outwash from the irrigation system of the Ho-t'ao Plain (6.2xl08 m3). The lake water outflows to the lake exits to the Yellow River. High water level is from September to October and the low water level from May to June. In most years the lake freezes in late October and thaws in late March, with the average frozen period of five months, and ice thickness in deeper water area reaches a maximum of 1.0 m (Duan et a l. 2005).
Current agricultural practices around the lake applied on average 550,000 tonnes of fertilizer and 1,500 tonnes of pesticides each year, and some of which eventually reach the lake. From 1970–2002, the total nitrogen load was 1088.59 tonnes per year, while the total phosphorous load was 65.75 tonnes per year (Shang et al.2003). The drainage and canals on the west shore of the lake, especially the 200 km main drainage canal, is the main source of nutrient input, bringing 85% of the water source for the WNR. In effect, the water quality of WNR depends on water quality arriving at and flowing through the main drainage canal, as well as the capacity of the reed swamp and macrophyte communities that reduce nitrogen and other pollutant loads.
Fisheries, tourism and reed harvesting are the three main industries historically and traditionally (Figure4).
Local inhabitants harvest reeds from December to January during the period of maximum extent of lake ice, It is illegal under national regulations to undertake such activity in nature reserves but there does not appear to be any a priori reason why an allocation of reeds for harvest (possibly on a rotational system) should not be allowed. Reed harvesting is the most important industry, and financial resource, for the human population around WNR. The production increased from 9,770 tonnes in 1978 to 72,383 tonnes in 1989 and it continued to rise from 1993 after a slight decline from 1989 to 1993 (Duan et al.2004). Currently 130,000 tonnes per year are harvested, bringing an income of USD 6.16 million. In summer, macrophytes, particularly the abundant Potamogeton pectinatus, are also collected from submerged areas and used as animal fodder.
WNR, and especially its lake, is a famous tourist destination known as the “Pearl beyond the Great Wall” and “Heaven of Birds”. As part of the tourist operations; there are packages including speedboat or water scooter activities, bird watching and fishing, most of which are undertaken close to the Boat Harbour (Figure5). Around 100,000 tourists per year visit WNR, mostly from nearby Baotou city or Linhe city, representing an income of around USD 750,000. Most tourists come in summer and, of the tourist activities, speedboats and water scooters would seem likely to have the most negative influence on breeding birds, although this has not been adequately quantified.
Comparison between two zoning model based on analysis of CPS
Key ecosystem SERVICES
Critical underlying ecosystem COMPONENTS
Critical underlying ecosystem PROCESSES
S1. Providing habitats for 23 resident and 46 migratory birds
293 km2 shallow lake;
Hydrology: Freezing & melting
The habitat with most migratory birds (conservation target), were set as core zone
The habitat with most migratory birds (conservation target), were set as core zone.
Habitat: Phragmites swamps
Considering ecological processes, such as hydrological regime, predation and breeding, etc.
S2. Provides habitat for 11 aquatic fauna
293 km2 shallow lake; Water chemistry
S3 Provides habitat for several fishes and benthos
Habitats: Open water with Macrophytes
Primary production of submerged plants
S4. Water purification
Water chemistry –
No special effort has been made
Risk-control zone was proposed to deal with external threats, such as over nutrient burden
Nutrient cycling, Carbon cycling, Oxidation reduction
Salinity & conductivity,
S5. Climate change mitigation
Dynamic zoning allows harvest of plants as industrial materials. Harvest itself improves primary production
S6. Fishery production of 1000 tonnes each year
Water chemistry –Salinity, Nutrients,
Irrigation & drainage currents
In experimental zone, some sustainable activities is allowed, but far from enough, especially in winter, the harvest season
Dynamic zoning allow for the harvest of reeds and macrophytes
S7.130,000 tonnes of reeds for industrial use
S8. Animal fodder
S9. Traditional harvesting and cultivation of fish and reed with historical and spiritual values
Fish: four major Chinese carp
Freezing & melting
All the harvest is forbidden in core and buffer zone according to Chinese Nature Conservation Law
Dynamic zoning allow tradtion reeds harvest, and fishing continues
S10. The site contributes to eco-tourism such as bird watching and boating
Limited eco-tourism allowed at the experimental zone
Through dynamic zoning, there is more space for tourism and scientific research in winter.
293km2 shallow lake
S11. The site is regionally important for scientific research and environment education
Birds: 240 species, mainly Migratory waterbirds and shorebirds.
Pollutant transmit within the lake
Using information derived from the CPS process, and given most of the surrounding land is semi-arid and has little conservation interest, we propose a refined zonation plan, differing from the existing by:
reducing the surrounding farmland with little conservation value by 150 km2;
slightly modifying the area of existing zones; and finally
rename and suggestion of a new zone: risk-control zone
Many authors (Dudley and Stolton2008, Xu et al.2007) recently have drawn attention to the need for wetlands to be considered in a broader landscape, or wetscape (Bridgewater 2008), context, with appropriate links and connectivity developed between different landscape elements. To some extent, the proposed limited-use zone functions as a buffer in minimizing negative and external effects of human activities on the core areas, but also promotes connectivity between the zones and the wider landscape. Although the core zones should be fully and effectively (i.e. legally) protected, Limited-use zones also should have some protection, so that they valign="top" can be designed to allow low-intensity sustainable use, helping maintain their function for both biological and cultural diversity valign="top" conservation.
To achieve these objectives we suggest a 1km area around the core zones as a limited-use zone to assist with maintaining ecosystem integrity of ecological processes. This limited-use zone (Figure6) also connects the core zones of GSR and XHZ, which are visited by local populations of swans, ducks, shore birds, and breeding grounds of Cygnus olor. The area of suggested limited-use zone is 92.51 km2, or 22.4% of the WNR.
Wise use zone
The Ramsar Convention defines wise use of wetlands as “the maintenance of their ecological character, achieved through the implementation of sound ecosystem approaches, within the context of sustainable development, to maintain environmental, economic and social sustainability in land use decisions, encourage compromises (“trade-offs“) between individual and collective interests.” (Ramsar Convention 2005). Using this definition we suggest the term wise use zone for areas with multiple land uses, but retaining a key role in delivering conservation through sustainable development.
Based on these concepts for zonation, our suggestion is to set the boat harbour, bird watching tower, fishery, and its adjacent water body as wise use zones (Figure6), with an area of 132.47 km2, taking 32.1% of the total reserve area. These wise use zones are designed to maintain good conditions for fisheries, other harvesting traditions and wetland culture.
In semi-arid regions lake ecosystems are usually vulnerable, with a range of external threats being a major risk to maintenance of their ecological character. The main non-point pollution of Wuliangsuhai Lake is from irrigation water. Maintenance of water quality benefits vary with the size of the buffer, the flow pattern, vegetation type, percent slope, soil type, surrounding land use, pollutant types and dose, and precipitation patterns (Sheldon et al.2005). To relieve and remove ecological risk, we propose an area of drainage and canal systems in the west shore and its adjacent reed swamp should be set as a risk-control zone (Figure6), with an area of 103.8km2, taking 25.1% of the area. Projects and programs such as pollution treatment, ecological restoration and biological conservation should be conducted in the zone to restore, and or maintain ecosystem function. The “experimental zone” in the existing zoning plan is largely sympatric with the wise use zone, although there is some overlap with the proposed risk-control zone.
The risk-control zone is of great importance. Agriculture activities outside WNR represent the main threat to the wetland ecosystem functioning, and thus service delivery. As a principal driver for wetland degradation, excessive fertilization contributing to the processes of eutrophication are directly or indirectly reinforced by valign="top" climate change. And, for WNR, a major consequence of eutrophication is the extension of reed swamps, rapid growth and spreading of aquatic macrophytes, and the development of algal blooms, in particular, during warm summer periods. Remote sensing imagery has shown that from 1975 to 2001, the area within WNR dominated by reed swamp has increased by six-fold (Hou and Deng2005). Shang et al. (2003) pointed out that the deposition of dead aquatic macrophytes into WNR lake was about 20.5 × 104t DW per year. Historic data show that the area of open water in WNR has shrunk from 660 km2 in 1950s into 270 km2 in 2000 (Yu 2003),In the absence of active management within 30 years the current WNR would seem destined to become completely valign="top" covered by reed swamp; and thus inimical to most of the bird species for which the area is designated a reserve. The risk-control zone is a new effort to deal with such kind of ecological risk.
We have established that four spatial zones provide the maximum conservation benefit for the key objective of managing for migratory birds during their period of residency. However, we also advocate viewing those zones through a temporal lens, and modifying management efforts appropriately by varying the zonation structure and consequent management or monitoring efforts on an annual basis. We are able to prescribe this dynamic zoning structure for WNR on the basis of the adequacy and extent of available data, as following:
While the zones described above are presented as fixed spatial entities, the highly dynamic nature of WNR suggests a role for temporal as well as spatial zonation. Ecosystem management that allows for different management strategies to be expressed temporally helps achieve clearly enunciated conservation targets. As we have described the overall target for WNR – conservation and maintenance of migratory wetland bird populations - is seasonal in nature. Learning from nature and seizing the “right” time to maximise conservation is essential to developing an efficient management system. Accordingly, we suggest a system of dynamic zoning on an annual basis would further improve the effectiveness of WNR management. The premise of such dynamic zoning assumes a deep understanding of ecological processes at spatial and temporal scales, which we believe exists for WNR.
Despite many studies carried out to select or determine the shape, size and the optimal placement of nature reserves (Blouin and Connor 1985, Buckley 1982, 1967, Higgs 1981, Higgs and Usher 1980, Li et al. 1999, Mac Arthur and Wilson 1967, Margules et al. 1982, Usher 1986), few practical studies for designing the interior structure of nature reserves, especially wetland reserves, have been published. Although no quantitative comparison has been made to the effectiveness of those different zoning patterns, this is the first endeavour to improve the existing zoning of WNR. It is quite true that each wetland has its own ecological characters. However, many of the wetlands are characteristic of dynamic change in vegetation, hydrology, migratory water bird population, etc. Therefore, the process to ecological character description and the zonation we propose for WNR would probably serve as an example, or new alternative to improve the basis for zonation establishment, which may have wide applications for wetland reserves that characterized by seasonal hydrological cycle, migration ground for birds, as well as under strong human use. Such zonation, taking account of human activity as well as that of wildlife, can help resolve the conflict between the objectives for nature conservation and community aspirations, and promote effective conservation and sustainable development for both nature and society.
This research was supported by National Science and Technology Support Program (2008BADB0B02). We thank the Administration of Wuliangsuhai wetland Nature Reserve for logistic support, and Li Xiaoyang for his dedication on maps.
- Blouin MS, Connor EF: Is there a best shape for nature reserves? Biological Conservation 1985, 32: 277-288. 10.1016/0006-3207(85)90114-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boere GC, Stroud DA: The flyway valign="top" concept: what it is and what it isn't. In Waterbirds around the world. Edited by: Boere GC, Galbraith CA, Stroud DA. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh; 2006:40-47.Google Scholar
- Bridgewater P: Wetscapes, a new concept for the Ramsar, CBD and CMS Conventions. Proceedings of Conference paper at the Society of Wetland Scientists (Asia Chapter) Conference 2008.Google Scholar
- Brock MA, Casanova MT: Plant life at the edge of wetlands: ecological responses to wetting and drying patterns. In Frontiers in Ecology. Edited by: Klomp N, Lunt I. Elsevier Science, Oxford; 1997:181-192.Google Scholar
- Buckley R: The habitat-unit model of island biogeography. Journal of Biogeography 1982, 9: 334-344.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bunn SE, Arthington AH: Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 2002, 30: 492-507. 10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Casanova MT, Brock MA: How do depth, duration and frequency of flooding influence the establishment of wetland plant communities. Plant Ecology 2000, 147: 237-250. 10.1023/A:1009875226637View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Davos CA, Siakavara K, Santorineou A, et al.: Zoning of marine protected areas: Conflicts and cooperation options in the Galapagos and San Andres archipelagos. Ocean & Coastal Management 2007, 50: 223-252. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.03.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Day JC: Zoning-lessons from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Ocean & Coastal Management 2002, 45: 139-156. 10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00052-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Diamond JM: Island biogeography and design of natural reserves. In Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications. Edited by: May RM. Blackwell, Oxford; 1967:163-186.Google Scholar
- Duan X, Wang X, Ouyang Z, et al.: The Biomass of Phragmites australis and its influence factors in Wuliangsuhai. Journal of Plant Ecology 2004, 28: 246-251. [in Chinese.]Google Scholar
- Duan X, Wang X, Ouyang Z: Evaluation of Wetland Ecosystem Services in Wuliangsuhai. Resource Science 2005, 27: 110-115. [in Chinese.]Google Scholar
- Dudley N, Stolton S (Eds): Defining protected areas: an international conference in Almeria, Spain. IUCN, Gland; 2008.Google Scholar
- Higgs AJ: Island biogeography theory and nature reserve design. Journal of Biogeography 1981, 8: 117-124. 10.2307/2844554View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Higgs AJ, Usher MB: Should nature reserves be large or small? Nature 1980, 285: 568-569. 10.1038/285568a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hou F, Deng F: Bio-accumulation Action and Exploitation and Utilization of Lake Mud of Wuliangsuhai in Inner Mongolia. Journal of Northeast Forestry University 2005, 33: 81-82. [in Chinese.]Google Scholar
- Li W, Zijian W, Zhijun M, et al.: Designing the core zone in a biosphere reserve based on suitable habitats: Yancheng Biosphere Reserve and the red crowned crane. Biological Conservation 1999, 90: 169-173.Google Scholar
- Li Y, Wang K, Sun G: Water resources allocation of Wuliangsuhai. Inner Mongolia Water Resources 2008, 116: 50-51. [in Chinese.]Google Scholar
- MacArthur RH, Wilson EO: The theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, New York; 1967.Google Scholar
- Margules C, Higgs AJ, Rafe RW: Modern biogeographic theory: are there any lessons for nature reserve design? Biological Conservation 1982, 24: 115-128. 10.1016/0006-3207(82)90063-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [MA]: Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington; 2003.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Environmental Protection, P.R. China [MEPPRC]: Construction and management status of nature reserves in China in 2009. 2010. . Accessed 23 Dec 2010 http://sts.mep.gov.cn/zrbhq/zrbhq/201012/t20101223_199053.htmGoogle Scholar
- Pan Y, Xing L, Yang G: A Preliminary Study on Avifauna’s Evolution in Wuliangsuhai Wetland during the Last 10 Years. Journal of Inner Mongolia University 2006, 3: 170-174. [in Chinese.]Google Scholar
- Ramsar Convention: Final Act of the International Conference on the Conservation of Wetlands and Waterfowl. 1971. . Accessed 17 Apr 1998 http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-cops-1971-final-act-of-the/main/ramsar/1-31-58-136%5E20803_4000_0__#recsGoogle Scholar
- Ramsar Convention: A Conceptual Framework for the wise use of wetlands and the maintenance of their ecological character. 2005. Resolution IX.1 Annex A, COP9, Kqampala.. Accessed 15 Nov 2005 http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-resol-resolutions-of-9th/main/ramsar/1-31-107%5E20925_4000_0__ Resolution IX.1 Annex A, COP9, Kqampala.. Accessed 15 Nov 2005Google Scholar
- Ramsar Convention: Describing the ecological character of wetlands, and data needs and formats for core inventory: harmonized scientific and technical guidance. 2008. Resolution X.15, COP10, Changwon. Accessed 4 Nov 2008 http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-resol-resolutions-of-10th/main/ramsar/1-31-107%5E21247_4000_0__ Resolution X.15, COP10, Changwon. Accessed 4 Nov 2008Google Scholar
- Ringelman JK, Flake LD: Diurnal visibility and activity of blue-winged teal and mallard broods. Journal of Wildlife Management 1980, 44: 822-829. 10.2307/3808310View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salomon AKN, Waller C, Mcllhagga R, et al.: Modeling the tropic effects of marine protected area zoning policies: A case study. Aquatic Ecology 1996, 36: 85-95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shang S, Du J, Li X, et al.: The Study on the Management of Eutrophication in Wuliangsuhai lake. Journal of Inner Mongolia agricultural university 2003, 24: 7-12. [in Chinese.]Google Scholar
- Sheldon DT, Hruby P, Johnson K, et al.: A Synthesis of the Science. Volume 1. Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia; 2005.Google Scholar
- Shelford VE: The preservation of natural biotic communities. Ecology 1933, 14: 240-245. 10.2307/1932891View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- UNESCO: Use and Conservation of the Biosphere. Proceedings of the intergovernmental conference of experts on the scientific basis for rational use and conservation of the resources of the biosphere. UNESCO, Paris; 1970. 4–13 September 1968Google Scholar
- Usher MB (Ed): Species conservation evaluation attributes, criteria and values. Biological Conservation and Evaluation. Chapman & Hall, London; 1986:3-44.Google Scholar
- Wang S, Dou H: Wuliangsuhai wetland. History of lakes in China. Science Press, Beijing; 1998:320-322. [in Chinese.]Google Scholar
- Xing L, Yang G: Avifauna of Wuliangsuhai, Inner Mongolia. Inner Mongolia University Press, Huhehot; 1996. [in Chinese.]Google Scholar
- Xu S, Guo H, Tian K: Zoning of Functional Areas of the Nature Reserve of Napahai Plateau Wetland. Wetland Science and Management 2007, 3: 27-29. [in Chinese.]Google Scholar
- Yang G, Xing L, Yan C, et al.: Birds New Records for Wuliangsuhai Wetland. Journal of Inner Mongolia University 1999, 30: 739-740. [in Chinese.]Google Scholar
- Yu R: Valuation of Water Environment and Study of Remote SensingTranslating Analysis in Wuliangsuhai Lake. Thesis, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Huhehot; 2003. [in Chinese.]Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly valign="top" cited.